This article is concerned with the status of generalisation in interpretive sociology. The case made is that generalisation is inevitable, desirable and possible. It is held that interpretivism must employ a special kind of generalisation, characterised here as moderatum. However, an acknowledgement that such generalisations can be made must bring us to specify the limits of generalisation in interpretive research. These limits are the limits of interpretivism itself and the paper concludes that this implies the adoption of methodological pluralism in order to realise the full potential of the method.
Bishop, Y. M. , Fienburg, S. and Holland, P. 1975. Discrete Multivariate Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
2.
Brewer, J. and Hunter, A. 1989. Multi-Method Research: A Synthesis of Styles. London: Sage.
3.
Bryman, A. 1988. Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyman.
4.
Casti, J. 1991. Searching for Certainty: What Scientists Can Know about the Future. London: Abacus.
5.
Cressey, D.1950. `Criminal Violation of Financial Trust'. American Sociological Review15:738-743.
6.
Denzin, N. 1983. `Interpretive Interactionism'. In G. Morgan (ed.), Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research. Beverley Hills, Calif.: Sage.
7.
Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y.1995. `Transforming Qualitative Research Methods. Is it a Revolution?'. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography349-358.
8.
Fink, A. 1995. How to Sample in Surveys. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
9.
Fielding, N. 1982. `Observational Research on the National Front'. In M. Bulmer (ed.), Social Research Ethics. London: Macmillan.
10.
Fisher, S.1993. `The Pull of the Fruit Machine: A Sociological Typology of Young Players'. Sociological Review3:41.
11.
Geertz, C. 1979. `Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight'. In P. Rabinow and M. Sullivan (eds.), Interpretive Social Science: A Reader. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.
12.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
13.
Gomm, R. , Hammerseley, M. and Foster, P. (forthcoming). Case Study Method: Divergent Interpretations. London: Sage.
14.
Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S.1982. `Epistemological and Methodological Bases of Naturalistic Enquiry'. Education Communication and Technology Journal30:233-252.
15.
Guba, E. and Lincoln, Y. 1994. `Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research'. In N. Denzin and S. Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
16.
Hammersley, M. 1990. Reading Ethnographic Research. London: Longman.
17.
Hammersley, M. 1992. What's Wrong With Ethnography?London: Routledge.
18.
Holdaway, S. 1982. `An Inside Job: A Case Study of Covert Research on the Police'. In M. Bulmer (ed.), Social Research Ethics. London: Macmillan.
19.
Howson, C. and Urbach, P. 1989. Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court.
20.
Jones, T.1998. `Interpretive Social Science and the “Native's” Point of View'. Philosophy of the Social Sciences28:132-168.
21.
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.1972. `Subjective Probability: A Judgement of Representativness'. Cognitive Psychology3:430-454.
22.
Kincaid, H. 1996. Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analysing Controversies in Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Kincheloe, J. and McLaren, P. 1994. `Rethinking Critical Theory and Qualitative Research'. In N. Denzin and S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
24.
Lindesmith, A. 1968 [1947]. Addiction and Opiates. Chicago: Aldine.
25.
Lukes, S. 1994. `Some Problems about Rationality'. In M. Martin and L. McIntyre (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
26.
Manicas, P. 1987. A History and Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.
27.
Mason, J. 1996. Qualitative Researching. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
28.
Rabinow, P. and Sullivan, W. 1979. `The Interpretive Turn: Emergence of an Approach'. In P. Rabinow and W. Sullivan (eds.), Interpretive Social Science: A Reader. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Robinson, W. S.1951. `The Logical Structure of Analytic Induction'. American Sociological Review16:812-818.
30.
Schutz, A. 1972 [1932]. The Phenomenology of the Social World. London: Heinemann.
31.
Taylor, C. 1994. `Interpretation and the Sciences of Man'. In M. Martin and L. McIntyre (eds.), Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
32.
Ward-Schofield, J. 1993. `Increasing the Generalizability of Quantitative Research'. In M. Hammersley (ed.), Social Research, Philosophy, Politics and Practice. London: Sage.
33.
Weber, M. 1975. Roscher und Knies. New York: Free Press.
34.
Weber, M. 1978. `The Nature of Social Action'. In W. Runciman (ed.) Weber: Selections in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
White, H.1995. `Network Switchings and Bayesian Forks: Reconstructing the Social and Behavioural Sciences'. Social Research62:1-28.
36.
Williams, M. 1998. `The Social World as Knowable'. In T. May and M. Williams (eds.), Knowing the Social World. Buckingham: Open University Press.
37.
Winch, P. 1970. `The Idea of a Social Science'. In B. Wilson (ed.) Rationality. Oxford: Blackwell.
38.
Winch, P. 1990 [1958] The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
39.
Znaniecki, F. 1934. The Method of Sociology. New York: Farrer and Rinehart.
