Warren McCulloch held Kenneth Craik's work in high regard. What was the source of this high regard and did this good opinion mean that Craik's work had any effect on McCulloch's own work? Aspects of Craik and McCulloch's backgrounds are examined to help explain McCulloch's views: the important place of philosophy in their education and some shared philosophical positions, their attraction to work in diverse disciplines, a respect for the science of physiology, an acceptance that mind was a legitimate object of enquiry, the demands and opportunities of military and wartime research, and a shared sense of creating a new approach to inquiries into human abilities. Two aspects of Craik's theory about the nature of thought were also key: his claim that modelling was central to thought and the fact that those views complemented McCulloch's own. Finally, McCulloch helped to contribute to Craik's reputation and in doing so helped to create a founding father for cybernetics to be set alongside the likes of Ashby, Wiener and McCulloch himself.
AbrahamT. H.2002. (Physio)logical circuits: The intellectual origins of the McCulloch-Pitts neural networks. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences38: 3–25.
2.
AbrahamT. H.2003. Integrating mind and brain: Warren S. McCulloch, cerebral localization, and experimental epistemology. Endeavour27: 32–36.
3.
AdrianE. D., CraikK. J. W. and SturdyR. S.1938. The electrical response of the auditory mechanism in cold-blooded vertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences125: 435–455.
4.
AizawaK.2010. Computation in cognitive science: it is not all about Turing- equivalent computation. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A41: 227–236.
5.
ArbibM. A.2000. Warren McCulloch's search for the logic of the nervous system. Perspectives in biology and medicine43: 193–216.
6.
AsaroP. M.2006. Working models and the synthetic method: Electronic brains as mediators between neurons and behavior. Science Studies19: 12–34.
7.
AsaroP. M.2009. Information and regulation in robots, perception and consciousness: Ashby's embodied minds. International Journal of General Systems38: 111–128.
BartlettF. C.1946. Obituary notice, Kenneth J. W. Craik, 1914–1945. British Journal of Psychology36: 109–116.
11.
ButlerS. V. F.1988. Centers and peripheries: The development of British physiology, 1870–1914. Journal of the History of Biology21: 473–500.
12.
CartwrightN.1983. How the laws of physics lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13.
ClarkD.2002. Enclosing the field: From ‘Mechanisation of Thought Processes’ to ‘Autonomics’. PhD thesis, University of Warwick, UK.
14.
CollinsA. F.2006. The embodiment of reconciliation: Order and change in the work of Frederic Bartlett. History of Psychology9: 290–312.
15.
CollinsA. F.2007. From H = log sn to Conceptual Framework: A Short History of Information. History of Psychology10: 44–72
16.
CollinsA.F.2011. England, in Oxford handbook of the history of psychology, ed. by D. Baker, pp. 271–299. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
CollinsA. F.In press. The reputation of Kenneth James William Craik. History of Psychology.
18.
CooterR.1982. Anticontagionism and History's Medical Record. In The problem of medical knowledge: Examining the social construction of medicine, eds by P. Wright and A. Treacher, pp. 87–108. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
19.
CordeschiR.2002. The discovery of the artificial: Behavior, mind and machines before and beyond cybernetics. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20.
CraikK. J. W.1940. Visual adaptation. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.
21.
CraikK. J. W.1943. The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CraikK. J. W.1947. Theory of the human operator in control systems: 1. The operator as an engineering system. British Journal of Psychology38: 56–61.
24.
CraikK. J. W.1948. Theory of the human operator in control systems: II: Man as an element in a control system. British Journal of Psychology38: 142–148.
25.
CraikK. J. W.1966. The nature of psychology: A selection of papers, essays and other writings by the late Kenneth J. W. Craik, ed. by Stephen L. Sherwood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
CraikK. J. W. and VinceM. A.1963a. Psychological and physiological aspects of control mechanisms with special reference to tank gunnery, Part I. Ergonomics6: 1–33.
27.
CraikK. J. W. and VinceM. A.1963b. Psychological and physiological aspects of control mechanisms with special reference to tank gunnery, Part II. Ergonomics6: 419–440.
28.
DeutschK.1951. Mechanism, teleology and mind. Philosophy and phenomenological research12: 185–223.
29.
GalisonP.1994. The ontology of the enemy: Norbert Wiener and the cybernetic vision. Critical Inquiry21: 228–266.
30.
GiereR.2004. How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science71: 742–752.
31.
GreenwoodJ. D.1999. Understanding the ‘cognitive revolution’ in psychology. Journal for the History of the Behavioral Sciences35: 1–22.
32.
HaylesN. K.1999. How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
HaywardR.2001. Our friends electric’: Mechanical models of mind in postwar Britain. In Psychology in Britain: Historical essays and personal reflections, eds. by G. C. Bunn, A. D. Lovie and G. D. Richards, pp. 309–332. Leicester: British Psychological Society and Science Museum.
34.
HearnshawL.S.1964. A short history of British psychology, 1840–1940. London: Methuen.
35.
HeimsS. J.1991. The cybernetics group. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
36.
HodgkinA.1976. Chance and design in electrophysiology: An informal account of certain experiments on nerve carried out between 1934 and 1952. Journal of Physiology263: 1–21.
37.
HusbandsP. and HollandO.2008. The Ratio Club: A hub of British cybernetics. In The mechanical mind in history, eds by P. Husbands, O. Holland, M. Wheeler, pp. 91–148. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
38.
JohnsonD.1944. Craik, K. J. W. The Nature of Explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 42: 187–188.
39.
Johnson-LairdP.N.2004. The history of mental models. In Psychology of reasoning: Theoretical and historical perspectives, eds. by K. I. Manktelow and Man Cheung Chung, 179–212. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
40.
KayL. E.2001. From logical neurons to poetic embodiments of mind: Warren S. McCulloch's project in neuroscience. Science in Context15: 591–604.
41.
McCullochW. S.1945. A heterarchy of values determined by the topology of nervous nets. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics7: 89–93.
42.
McCullochW. S.1949. Physiological processes underlying psychoneuroses. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine42: 71–84.
43.
McCullochW. S.1951. Why the mind is in the head. In Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior: The Hixon symposium, ed. by L. A. Jeffress, pp. 42–111. New York: John Wiley.
44.
McCullochW. S.1965. Embodiments of mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
45.
McCullochW. S.1974. Recollections of the many sources of cybernetics. ASC Forum6: 5–16.
46.
McCullochW. S. and PittsW.1943. A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics5: 115–133.
47.
McCullochW. S. to AdrianE.D. October 1951. Letter. Warren S. McCulloch Papers, American Philosophical Society: Series 1 Correspondence.
48.
MayrO.1970. The origins of feedback control. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
49.
NersessianN.2007. Mental modeling in conceptual change. In International handbook of research on conceptual change, ed. by S. Vosniadou, pp. 391–411. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
PiccininiG.2004. The first computational theory of mind and brain: A close look at McCulloch and Pitts's ‘Logical Calculus of Ideas Immanent in Nervous activity’. Synthese141: 175–215.
51.
PickeringA.1995. Cyborg history and the World War II regime. Perspectives on Science3: 1–48.
52.
PickeringA.2010. The cybernetic brain: Sketches of another future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.
RosenbluethA. and WienerN.1945. The roles of models in science. Philosophy of Science12: 316–321.
54.
SemeonoffB.1951. James Drever: 1873–1950. American Journal of Psychology64: 283–285.
55.
VinceM.1996. Recollections of Kenneth Craik. The Psychologist, February67–68.
Von NeumannJ.1951. The general and logical theory of automata. In Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior: The Hixon symposium, ed. by L. A. Jeffress, pp. 1–41. Wiley: New York.
58.
WatersonP. and SellR.2006. Recurrent themes and developments in the history of the Ergonomics Society. Ergonomics49: 743–799.
59.
WelfordA. T.1946. Kenneth James William Craik. The Eagle52: 388–390.
60.
ZangwillO. L.1980. Kenneth Craik: The man and his work. British Journal of Psychology71: 1–16.
