Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The term ‘Washington Consensus’, as Williamson the father of the term conceived it, in 1989, was a set of reforms for economic development that he judged ‘Washington’ could agree were required in Latin America. However, the Washington Consensus has been identified as a neoliberal manifesto and as a consequence an anti-Washington Consensus was initiated, as calls were made for the establishment of a different set of policies, such as the ‘Post-Washington Consensus’, ‘Washington Contentious’ and ‘After Neoliberalism’. Lately, even Williamson has come up with a new set of policies, ‘After the Washington Consensus’. The aim of this paper is to investigate the different interpretations and alternatives of this controversial set of policies, and to reveal that the evolution of the debate conceptualizes the evolution of economic thought regarding the required policies for economic development.

Keywords

Washington Consensus Economic development Post-Washington Consensus After the Washington Consensus

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barro

(1997) Determinants of Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Birdsall

de la Torre

Menezes

(2001) Washington Contentious: Economic Policies for Social Equity in Latin America, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Inter-American Dialogue.

Chang

Grabel

(2004) Reclaiming Development: An Alternative Economic Policy Manual, London: Zed Books.

Florio

(2002) Economists, Privatization in Russia and the Waning of the ‘Washington Consensus’, Review of International Political Economy, 9(2): 374–415.

Kuczynski

P.P.

Williamson

(2003) After the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America, Washington, DC: Institute for International Studies.

Mathews

Hakim

(2001) Foreword, in: Birdsall

de la Torre

Menezes

(eds), Washington Contentious: Economic Policies for Social Equity in Latin America, Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and Inter-American Dialogue, pp. iii–iv.

Rodrik

(2002) After Neoliberalism, What?, paper presented at the Alternatives to Neoliberalism Conference sponsored by the New Rules for Global Finance Coalition, 23–24 May, and at the BNDES seminar on New Paths to Development, 12–13 September.

Rodrik

(2004) Growth strategies, working paper, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

Santiso

(2004) The contentious Washington Consensus: Reforming the reforms in emerging markets, Review of International Political Economy, 11(4): 828–844.

10.

Stewart

(1997) John Williamson and the Washington Consensus revisited, in Emmerij

(ed.), Economic and Social Development in the XXI Century, Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, pp. 62–69.

11.

Stiglitz

(1998) More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving toward the Post-Washington Consensus, WIDER Annual Lectures, United Nations University.

12.

Stiglitz

(2000) Unraveling the Washington Consensus, Multinational Monitor, 21(4): 13–21.

13.

Stiglitz

(2002) Globalization and its Discontents, New York: W. W. Norton.

14.

Williamson

(2000) What should the World Bank think about the Washington Consensus?, World Bank Research Observer, 15(2): 251–264.

15.

Williamson

(2002) Review of Globalization and Its Discontents, Washington, DC: Institute of International Economics.

16.

Williamson

(2003a) Our agenda and the Washington Consensus, in Kuczynski

P. P.

Williamson

(eds), After the Washington Consensus, Washington, DC: Institute for International Studies, pp. 323–331.

17.

Williamson

(2003b) An agenda for restarting growth and reform, in Kuczynski

P. P.

Williamson

(eds), After the Washington Consensus, Washington, DC: Institute for International Studies, pp. 1–19.

18.

Williamson

(2003d) Summing up, in Kuczynski

P. P.

Williamson

(eds), After the Washington Consensus, Washington, DC: Institute for International Studies, pp. 305–321.

19.

Williamson

(2004a) The Washington Consensus as policy prescription for development, lecture in the series Practitioners of Development delivered at the World Bank, 13 January.

20.

Williamson

(2004b) A short history of the Washington Consensus, paper commissioned by Fundacion CIDOB for the From Washington Consensus towards a new Global Governance conference, Barcelona, 24–25 September.

21.

Williamson

(2004–2005) The strange history of the Washington Consensus, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27(2): 195–206.

The Evolution of the Anti-Washington Consensus Debate: From ‘Post-Washington Consensus’ to ‘After the Washington Consensus’

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References