Ethical issues in international nursing research are identified and the perspectives of the International Centre for Nursing Ethics are offered in an effort to develop an international consensus of ethical behaviour in research. First, theoretical issues are reviewed, then initial conditions for ethical conduct are defined, and protocol design and procedure considerations are examined. A concerted effort is made to identify and avoid a western bias. Broad guiding principles for designing and reviewing research are offered: (1) respect for persons; (2) beneficence; (3) justice; (4) respect for community; and (5) contextual caring. A collaborative model of the researcher-participant relationship is suggested and discussed.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission . Ethical and policy issues in international research: clinical trials in developing countries, 2 vols. Rockville, MD: US Government Printing Office , 2001. Available from: URL: http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/nbac/pubs.html [Accessed 30-Oct-2002]
2.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics . The ethics of clinical research in developing countries. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics , 1999. Available from: URL: http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/filelibrary/pdf/clinicaldiscuss1.pdf [Accessed 30-Oct-2002]
3.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics . The ethics of research related to healthcare in developing countries. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics , 2002. Available from: URL: http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publications/developingcountries/rep0000000942.asp [Acessed 30-Oct-2002]
4.
Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS . Ethical considerations in HIV preventive vaccine research: UNAIDS guidance document. Geneva: UNAIDS , 2000. Available from: URL: http://www.unaids.org/publications/documents/vaccines/vaccines/Ethicsresearch.pdf [Accessed 30-Oct-2002]
5.
Orb A , Eisenhauer L , Wynaden D.Ethics in qualitative research . Image J Nurs Sch2001; 33: 93-96 .
6.
Schoepf BG.Ethical, methodological and political issues of AIDS research in Central Africa . Soc Sci Med1991; 33: 749-763 .
7.
Proceedings of the 9th Biennial conference of the Workgroup of European Nurse Researchers, vol. 1; 1998 July 5-8; Helsinki, Finland. Helsinki: Oy Edita Ab, 1998; 134-145 .
8.
Byrne M.The concept of informed consent in qualitative research . AORN J2001; 74: 401-403 .
9.
Upvall M , Hashwani S.Negotiating the informed-consent process in developing countries: a comparison of Swaziland and Pakistan . Int Nurs Rev2001; 48: 188-192 .
10.
Glenister D.Nursing research ethics: some problems and recommended changes . Nurs Times Res1996; 1: 184-190 .
11.
Levine R.Ethics and the regulation of clinical research, second edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press , 1986.
12.
Pandey U.Would you like to listen or not ? Anthropol Newsletter1992; (May): 3-3 .
13.
Levine R.Informed consent: some challenges to the universal validity of the western model . Law Med Health Care1991; 19: 207-213 .
14.
Christakis N , Panner M.Existing international ethical guidelines for human subjects research: some open questions . Law Med Health Care1991; 19: 214-221 .
15.
Nagel T.The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press , 1986.
16.
Angell M.Ethical imperialism? Ethics in international collaborative clinical research . N Engl J Med1998; 319: 1081-1083 .
17.
Benatar SR.Imperialism, research ethics, and global health . J Med Ethics1998; 24: 221-222 .
Davis AJ.Global influence of American nursing: some ethical issues . Nurs Ethics1999; 6: 118-125 .
20.
Beauchamp T , Childress J.Principles of biomedical ethics, fifth edition. New York: Oxford University Press , 2001.
21.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research . The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human participants of research. Washington: OPPR Reports . A6-A14; 1979. Available from: URL: http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humanparticipants/guidance/belmont.htm [Accessed 30- Oct-2002]
22.
Takala T.What is wrong with global bioethics? On the limitations of the four principles approach . Camb Q Healthc Ethics2001; 10: 72-77 .
23.
Benjamin M , Curtis J.Ethics in nursing, third edition. New York: Oxford University Press , 1992.
24.
Hall J.Nursing ethics and law. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders , 1996.
25.
Frankena W.Ethics, second edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall , 1973.
26.
Lützén K.Nursing ethics in the next millennium: a context sensitive approach for nursing ethics . Nurs Ethics1997; 4: 218-226 .
27.
Arendt H.The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt , 1973
28.
Nortvedt P.Sensitive judgment: nursing moral philosophy and the ethics of care. Oslo: Tano Aschehoug , 1996.
29.
Vetlesen A.Perception, empathy, and judgment: an inquiry into the preconditions of moral performance. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press , 1994.
30.
Benner P , Wrubel J.The primacy of caring. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley , 1989.
31.
Gastmans C , Dierckx de Casterlé B , Schotsmans P.Nursing considered as moral practice: a philosophical-ethical interpretation of nursing . Kennedy Inst Ethics J1998; 8: 43-69 .
32.
Gastmans C.Care as a moral attitude in nursing . Nurs Ethics1999; 6: 214-223 .
33.
Gilligan C.Remapping the moral domain: new images of self in relationship. In: Gilligan C , Ward J , Taylor J , eds. Mapping the moral domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1988, 3-20.
34.
Eades SJ , Read AW.The Bibbulung Gnarneep project: practical implementation of guidelines on ethics in indigenous health . Med J Austr1999; 170: 433-436 .
35.
Kaufert J , Commanda L , Elias B , Grey R , KueYoung T , Masuzumi B.Evolving participation of aboriginal communities in health research ethics review: the impact of the Inuvik workshop . Int J Circumpolar Health1999; 58: 134-144 .
36.
Macaulay AC , Cross EJ , Delormier T , Potvin L , Paradis G , McComber A.Developing a code of research ethics for research with a native community in Canada: a report from the Kahnawake schools diabetes prevention project . Int J Circumpolar Health1998; 57(suppl 1): 38-40 .
37.
Figueroa JP.Is serious research possible in the Caribbean ? Ethn Dis1991; 1: 368-378 .
38.
Kass N , Hyder A.Attitudes and experiences of US and developing country investigators regarding US human subjects regulations. In:. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Ethical and policy issues in international research: clinical trials in developing countries, vol. 2. Rockville, MD: US Government Printing Office , p. B1-B220; 2001. Available from: URL: http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/nbac/clinical/Vol2.pdf [Accessed 30-Oct- 2002]
39.
World Medical Association . The Helsinki Declaration: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, 2000. Available from: URL: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/17c.pdf [Accessed 30-Oct-2002]
40.
Council for International Organizations for Medical Sciences . CIOMS international ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects, revised draft, 2002. Available from: URL: http://www.cioms.ch/frame_guidelines_january_2002.htm [Accessed 3-May-2002]
41.
Horster D. (Thompson H, trans.). Habermas: an introduction. Philadelphia, PA: Pennbridge Books , 1992.
42.
King P.Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee syphilis study. The dangers of difference . Hastings Cent Rep1992; 22(6): 35-38 .
43.
Department of Health and Human Services , National Institutes of Health , Office for Protection from Research Risk . Protection of human subjects. Code of Federal Regulations, Tile 45, Part 46 [Federal Register56: 28003-28032 . Appendix 4, A4-35 - A4-49]; June 18, 1991. Available from: URL: http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humanparticipants/guidance/45cfr46.htm [Accessed 30-Oct-2002]
44.
Åstedt-Kurki P , Friedemann M , Paavilainen E , Tammentie T , Paunonen-Ilmonen M.Assessment of strategies in families tested by Finnish families . Int J Nurs Stud2001; 38: 17-24 .
45.
Konishi E , Davis A.The right-to-die and the duty-to-die: perceptions of nurses in the West and in Japan . Int Nurs Rev2000; 48(1): 17-28 .
46.
Government Printing Office . Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, v. 2, Nuremberg, October 1946 - April 1949. Washington, DC , 1949. Available from: URL: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/nuremberg.php3 [Accessed 30-Oct-2002]
47.
Meier C. (Kimber R, Kimber R, trans.). Athens: a portrait of the city in its golden age. New York: Metropolitan Books , 1998.
48.
Thomasma D.Proposing a new agenda: bioethics and international human rights . Camb Q Healthc Ethics2001; 10: 299-310 .
49.
Wang C , Huch M.Protecting human research participants: an international perspective . Nurs Sci Q2000; 13: 293-298 .
50.
Council of Europe . Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine, 1997. Available from: URL: http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/treaties/html/164.htm [Accessed 30-Oct-2002]
51.
Appelbaum P , Roth L , Lidz C , Benson P , Winslade W.False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception . Hastings Cent Rep1987; 17(2): 20-24 .
52.
Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments . The human radiation experiments. New York: Oxford University Press , 1996. Available from: URL: http://tis.eh.doe.gov/ohre/roadmap/achre/report.html [Accessed 30-Oct-2002]
53.
Daugherty C , Ratain M , Grochowski Eet al.Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in Phase I trials . J Clin Oncol1995; 13: 1062-1072 .
54.
Jonsen AR , Siegler M , Winslade WJ.Clinical ethics, fourth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill , 1998.
55.
Goffman E.The presentation of self in everyday life. Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press , 1973.
56.
Reiman J.Privacy, intimacy, and personhood. In: Schoeman F , ed. Philosophical dimensions of privacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1984, 330-361.
57.
Bok S.Secrets: on the ethics of concealment and revelation. New York: Vintage , 1983.
58.
Levy R.Self and emotion . Ethos J Soc Psychol Anthropol1983; 11: 128-134 .
59.
Lynd H.On shame and the search for identity. New York: Harcourt, Brace , 1958.
60.
Moore B.Privacy: studies in social and cultural history. Armonk, NY: Sharpe , 1984.
61.
Katz J.The regulation of human research - reflections and proposals . Clin Res1973; 21: 785-791 .
62.
Medical Research Council of Canada , Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada , Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada . Tri-council policy statement on ethical conduct for research involving humans, 1998. Available from: URL: http://www.nserc.ca/programs/ethics/english/ethics-e.pdf [Accessed 30-Oct-2002]
63.
Verheggen F , Jonkers R , Kok G.Patients’ perceptions on informed consent and the quality of information disclosure in clinical trials . Patient Educ Counsel1996; 29: 137-153 .
64.
Moody H.Ethics in an aging society. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press , 1992.
65.
Fethe C.Beyond voluntary consent: Hans Jonas on the moral requirements of human experimentation . J Med Ethics1993; 9: 99-103 .
66.
Annas G , Grodin M.Human rights and maternal-fetal HIV transmission prevention trials in Africa . Am J Public Health1998; 88: 560-563 .
