Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Any measurement method of a physical quantity cannot provide an exact unequivocal result owing to the infinite amount of information necessary to characterize fully both the physical quantity to be measured and the measuring process. Therefore, a quantitative indication of the quality of a measurement result needs to be given to enable its reliable use. Uncertainty is one such indication. Provision of incorrect uncertainty statements for measurements performed by a co-ordinate measuring machine (CMM) may lead to very serious economic implications. In this study, the uncertainty of CMM measurements is estimated by a single parameter accounting for both systematic and random errors. The effects that environmental conditions (temperature), discretionary set-up parameters (probe extension, stylus length), and measuring plan decisions (number of points) have on uncertainty of measurements are then investigated. Interactions between such factors are also shown to be significant.

Keywords

CMM co-ordinate measuring machines uncertainty ANOVA root mean square error RMSE

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ISO 10360-1, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) –Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate measuring machines (CMM), International Organization for Standardization, 2001.

ANSI/ASME B89.4.1, Methods for performance evaluation of coordinate measuring machines (CMM), 1997.

VDI/VDE 2617-3, Accuracy of coordinate measuring machines (CMM), components of measurement deviation of the machine, 1989.

Collins

C. E.

Fay

E. B.

Aguirre-Cruz

J. A.

Raman

, ‘Alternate methods for sampling in co-ordinate metrology’ Proc. IMechE, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture 221 (B6) (2007): 1041–1052.

International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology, reproduced verbatim in PD 6461-1. General metrology – Part 1: Basic and general terms (VIM), British Standards Institution, 1995.

Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, reproduced verbatim in PD 6461-3. General metrology – Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM), British Standards Institution, 1995.

Hermann

, ‘Geometric error correction in coordinate measurement’ Acta Polytech. Hung. 4 (1) (2007): 47–61.

Feng

C.-X. J.

Pandey

, ‘Experimental study of the effect of digitising parameters on digitising uncertainty with a CMM’ Int. J. Prod. Res. 40 (3) (2002): 683–697.

Feng

C.-X. J.

Saal

Salsbury

Ness

Lin

, ‘Design and analysis of experiments in CMM measurement uncertainty study’ J. Precision Engng 31 (2) (2007): 94–101.

10.

Miguel

King

Abackerli

, ‘CMM touch trigger performance verification using a probe test apparatus’ J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. and Engng 25 (2) (2003): 1–16.

11.

Mood

Graybill

Boes

, Introduction to the theory of statistics (New York: McGraw-Hill 1974).

12.

ISO/TS 15530-3, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement. Use of calibrated workpieces or standards, International Organization for Standardization, 2004.

13.

Zhang

S. G.

Ajmal

Wootton

Chisholm

, ‘An automated inspection planning system for coordinate measuring machines’ Proc. IMechE, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture 215 (2001): 419–424.

14.

R Development Core Team, A Language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, www.r-project.org, 2008.

15.

Pinheiro

J. C.

Bates

D. M.

, Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus (New York: Springer 2000).