ReillyD. T.BursteinA. H.The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J. Biomechanics, 1975, 8, 393–405.
2.
AshmanR. B.CowinS. C.Van BuskirkW. C.RiceJ. C.A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. J. Biomechanics, 1984, 17, 349–361.
3.
ReillyD. T.BursteinA. H.FrankelV. H.The elastic modulus for bone. J. Biomechanics, 1974, 7, 271–725.
4.
CezayirliogluH.BahniukE.DavyD. T.HeipleK. G.Anisotropic yield behavior of bone under combined axial force and torque. J. Biomechanics, 1985, 18, 61–69.
5.
SammarcoG. J.BursteinA. H.DavisW. L.FrankelV. H.The biomechanics of torsional fractures: The effect of loading on ultimate properties. J. Biomechanics, 1971, 4, 113–117.
6.
WrightT. M.HayesW. C.Tensile testing of bone over a wide range of strain rates: Effects of strain rate, microstructure and density. Med. Biol. Engng, 1976, 14, 671–680.
7.
BehiriJ. C.BonfieldW.Orientation dependence of the fracture mechanics of bone. J. Biomechanics, 1989, 22, 863–872.
8.
MelvinJ. W.Fracture mechanics of bone. J. Biomech. Engng, 1993, 115, 549–554.
9.
NormanT. L.VashishthD.BurrD. B.Fracture toughness of human bone under tension. J. Biomechanics, 1995, 28, 309–320.
10.
MelvinJ. W.EvansF. G.Crack propagation in bone. In ASME Biomechanics Symposium, New York, 1973, pp. 87–88 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).
11.
WrightT. M.HayesW. C.Fracture mechanics parameters for compact bone—effects of density and specimen thickness. J. Biomechanics, 1977, 10, 419–430.
12.
BonfieldW.GrynpasM. D.YoungR. J.Crack velocity and the fracture of bone. J. Biomechanics, 1978, 11, 473–479.
13.
BehiriJ. C.BonfieldW.Fracture mechanics of bone—the effects of density, specimen thickness and crack velocity on longitudinal fracture. J. Biomechanics, 1984, 17, 25–34.
14.
BonfieldW.BehiriJ. C.CharambilidesB.Orientation and age-related dependence of the fracture toughness of cortical bone. In Biomechanics: Current Interdisciplinary Research (Eds PerrinS. M.SchneiderE.), 1984, pp. 185–189 (Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht).
15.
NormanT. L.VashishthD.BurrD. B.Model fracture toughness of human bone. In Advances in Bioengineering (Ed. VanderbyR.), Vol. 20 BED, 1991, pp. 361–364 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).
16.
NormanT. L.VashishthD.BurrD. B.Effect of groove on bone fracture toughness. J. Biomechanics, 1992, 25, 1489–1492.
17.
BonfieldW.DattaP. K.Fracture toughness of compact bone. J. Biomechanics, 1976, 9, 131–134.
18.
RobertsonD. M.RobertsonD.BarretC. R.Fracture toughness, critical crack length and plastic zone size in bone. J. Biomechanics, 1978, 11, 359–364.
19.
MoyleD. D.GavensA. J.Fracture properties of bovine tibial bone. J. Biomechanics, 1986, 19, 919–927.
20.
ZiouposP.CurreyJ. D.Changes in the stiffness, strength and toughness of human cortical bone with age. Bone, 1998, 22, 57–66.
21.
SedmanA. J.Mechanical failure of bone and antler: The accumulation of damage. DPhil thesis, University of York, 1993.
22.
ChoiK.GoldsteinS. A.A comparison of the fatigue behavior of human trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J. Biomechanics, 1992, 25, 1371–1381.
23.
GrayR. J.KorbacherG. K.Compressive fatigue behaviour of bovine compact bone. J. Biomechanics, 1974, 7, 287–292.
24.
CarterD. R.HayesW. C.Fatigue life of compact bone—I. Effects of stress amplitude, temperature and density. J. Biomechanics, 1976, 9, 27–34.
25.
ZiouposP.WangXiao-TongCurreyJ. D.Experimental and theoretical quantification of the development of damage in fatigue tests of bone and antler. J. Biomechanics, 1996, 29, 989–1002.
26.
ZiouposP.WangXiao-TongCurreyJ. D.The accumulation of fatigue microdamage in human cortical bone of two different ages in-vitro. Clin Biomechanics, 1996, 11, 365–375.
27.
CarterD. R.CalerW. E.Cycle-dependent and time-dependent bone fracture with repeated loading. J. Biomech. Engng, 1983, 105, 166–170.
28.
SwansonS. A. V.FreemanM. A.R.DayW. H.The fatigue properties of human cortical bone. Med. Biol. Engng, 1971, 9, 23–32.
LesC. M.StoverS. M.KeyakJ. H.TaylorK. T.KanepsA. J.Stiff and strong material properties are associated with brittle post-yield behavior in cortical bone. Abstract, 41st Annual Meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, 1995, pp. 131–132.
31.
RiggsC. M.VaughanL. C.EvansG. P.LanyonL. E.BoydeA.Mechanical implications of collagen fibre orientation in cortical bone of the equine radius. Anat. Embryol., 1993, 187, 239–248.
32.
CurreyJ. D.Differences in the tensile strength of bone of different histological types. J. Anat., 1959, 93, 87–95.
33.
ReillyD. T.BursteinA. H.The mechanical properties of cortical bone. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1974, 56-A, 1001–1022.
34.
McCaldenR. W.McGeoughJ. A.BarkerM. B.Court-BrownC. M.Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone. The relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization and microstructure. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1993, 75-A, 1193–1205.
35.
BursteinA. H.ReillyD. T.MartensM.Aging of bone tissue: Mechanical properties. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1976, 58-A, 82–86.
36.
CurreyJ. D.ButlerG.The mechanical properties of bone tissue in children. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1975, 57-A, 810–814.
37.
CurreyJ. D.Changes in the impact energy absorption of bone with age. J. Biomechanics, 1979, 12, 459–469.
38.
McPhersonG. K.KriewallT. J.The elastic modulus of fetal cranial bone: A first step towards an understanding of the biomechanics of fetal head molding. J. Biomechanics, 1980, 13, 9–16.
39.
ReidS. A.BoydeA.Changes in the mineral density distribution in human bone with age: Image analysis using backscattered electrons in the SEM. J. Bone Mineral Res., 1987, 2, 13–22.
40.
BoyceT. M.BloebaumR. D.Cortical aging differences and fracture implications for the human femoral neck. Bone, 1993, 14, 769–778.
41.
TownsendP. R.RoseR. M.RadinE. L.Buckling studies of single human trabeculae. J. Biomechanics, 1975, 8, 199–201.
42.
ChoiK.KuhnJ. L.CiarelliM. J.GoldsteinS. A.The elastic moduli of human subchondral, trabecular, and cortical bone tissue and the size-dependency of cortical bone modulus. J. Biomechanics, 1990, 23, 1103–1113.
43.
KuhnJ. L.GoldsteinS. A.ChoiK.LondonM.FeldkampL. A.MatthewsL. S.Comparison of the trabecular and cortical tissue moduli from human iliac crests. J. Orthop. Res., 1989, 7, 876–884.
44.
RyanS. D.WilliamsJ. L.Tensile testing of rodlike trabeculae excised from bovine femoral bone. J. Biomechanics, 1989, 22, 351–355.
45.
RhoJ. Y.AshmanR. B.TurnerC. H.Young's modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: Ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. J. Biomechanics, 1993, 26, 111–119.
46.
van RietenbergenB.WeinansH.HuiskesR.OdgaardA.A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models. J. Biomechanics.1995, 28, 69–81.
47.
van RietenbergenB.OdgaardA.KabelJ.HuiskesR.Determination of tissue elastic properties by comparison of experimental and finite element results. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Society of Biomechanics (Eds Vander SlotenJ.LowetG.Van AudekerckeR.Van der PerreG.), Leuven, 1996, pp. 327.
48.
WilliamsJ. L.LewisJ. L.Properties and an anisotropic model of cancellous bone from the proximal tibial epiphysis. J. Biomech. Engng, 1982, 104, 50–56.
49.
MenteP. L.LewisJ. L.Experimental method for the measurement of the elastic modulus of trabecular bone tissue. J. Orthop. Res., 1989, 7, 456–461.
50.
RunkleJ. C.PughJ. W.The micromechanics of cancellous bone—II. Determination of the elastic modulus of individual trabeculae by buckling analysis. Bull. Hosp. Jt Dis., 1975, 36, 2–10.
51.
KuJ. L.GoldsteinS. A.ChoiK.LondonM.HerzigM. A.MatthewsL. S.The mechanical properties of single trabeculae. In Transactions of the 33rd Orthopaedic Research Society Meeting, 1987, Vol. 12, pp. 48.
52.
AshmanR. B.RhoJ. Y.Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. J. Biomechanics, 1988, 21, 177–181.
53.
JensenK. S.MosekildeL.MosekildeL.A model of vertebral trabecular architecture and its mechanical properties. Bone, 1990, 11, 417–423.
54.
HodgskinsonR.CurreyJ. D.EvansG. P.Hardness, an indicator of the mechanical competence of cancellous bone. J. Orthop. Res., 1989, 7, 754–758.
55.
HodgskinsonR.CurreyJ. D.Young's modulus, density and material properties in cancellous bone over a large density range. J. Mater. Sci., Mater. Med., 1992, 3, 377–381.
56.
OdgaardA.HvidI.LindeF.Compressive axial strain distributions in cancellous bone specimens. J. Biomech., 1989, 22, 829–835.
57.
OdgaardA.LindeF.The underestimation of Young's modulus in compressive testing of cancellous bone specimens. J. Biomechanics, 1992, 24, 691–698.
58.
KeavenyT. M.BorchersR. E.GibsonL. J.HayesW. C.Theoretical analysis of the experimental artifact in trabecular bone compressive modulus. J. Biomechanics, 1993, 26, 599–607.
59.
CarterD. R.HayesW. C.Bone compressive strength: The influence of density and strain rate. Science, 1976, 194, 1174–1176.
60.
CarterD. R.HayesW. C.The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1977, 59-A, 954–962.
RiceJ. C.CowinS. C.BowmanJ. A.On the dependence of elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J. Biomechanics, 1988, 21, 155–168.
63.
GibsonL. J.The mechanical behavior of cancellous bone. J. Biomechanics, 1985, 18, 341–349.
64.
KeavenyT. M.WachtelE. F.FordC. M.HayesW. C.Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. J. Biomechanics, 1994, 27, 1137–1146.
65.
ZyssetP. K.CurnierA.A 3D damage model for trabecular bone based on fabric tensors. J. Biomechanics, 1996, 29, 1549–1558.
66.
LindeF.PongsoipetchB.FrichL. H.HvidH.Three-axial strain controlled testing applied to bone specimens from the proximal tibial epiphysis. J. Biomechanics, 1990, 23, 1167–1172.
67.
HodgskinsonR.CurreyJ. D.Effects of structural variation on Young's modulus of non-human cancellous bone. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H, Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1990, 204 (H1), 43–52.
68.
DalstraM.HuiskesR.OdgaardA.van ErningL.Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. J. Biomechanics, 1993, 26, 523–525.
69.
LindeF.HvidI.MadsenF.The effect of specimen geometry on the mechanical behaviour of trabecular bone specimens. J. Biomechanics, 1992, 25, 359–368.
70.
BowenR. L.RodriguezM. S.Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. J. Am. Dent. Ass., 1962, 64, 378–387.
71.
LehmanM. I.Tensile strength of human dentin. J. Dent. Res., 1967, 46, 197–201.
72.
SanoH.CiucchiB.MatthewsW. G.PashleyD. H.Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J. Dent. Res., 1994, 73, 1205–1211.
73.
SanoH.TakatsuT.CiucchiB.RussellC. M.PashleyD. H.Tensile properties of resin-infiltrated demineralized human dentin. J. Dent. Res., 1995, 74, 1093–1102.
74.
PeytonF. A.MahlerD. B.HershanovB.Physical properties of dentine. J. Dent. Res., 1952, 31, 366–370.
75.
StanfordJ. W.WeigelK. V.PaffenbergerG. C.SweeneyW. T.Compressive properties of hard tooth tissues and some restorative materials. J. Am. Dent. Ass., 1960, 60, 746–751.
76.
HuangT-J.SchilderH.NathansonD.Effects of moisture content and endodontic treatment on some mechanical properties of human dentin. J. Endodontics, 1992, 18, 209–215.
77.
BrearK.CurreyJ. D.KingsleyM. C.S.RamseyM.The mechanical design of the tusk of the narwhal (Monodon monoceros: Cetacea). J. Zool., Lond., 1993, 230, 411–423.
78.
Observations in the author's laboratory.
79.
CraigR. G.PeytonF. A.Elastic and mechanical properties of human dentin. J. Dent. Res., 1958, 37, 710–718.
80.
RasmussenS. T.PatchinR. E.Fracture properties of human enamel and dentin in an aqueous environment. J. Dent. Res., 1984, 63, 1362–1368.
