In this study, a multi-objective optimization of an axial compressor rotor blade has been performed through genetic algorithm with total pressure and adiabatic efficiency as objective functions. The non-dominated sorting of genetic algorithm-II has been implemented and confidence check has been performed at k-means clustered points among all the Pareto-optimal solutions. Reynolds-averaged Navier—Stokes equations are solved to obtain the objective function and flow field inside the compressor annulus. The objective functions are used to generate Pareto-optimal front. The design variables are selected from blade lean and thickness through the Bezier polynomial formulation. By this optimization, maximum efficiency and total pressure are increased by 1.76 and 0.41 per cent, respectively, when two extreme clustered points are considered as optimal designs.
DunhamJ.CFD validation for propulsion system components. AGARD Advisory Report 355, 1998.
2.
ReidL.MooreR. D.Design and overall performance of four highly-loaded, high-speed inlet stages for an advanced, high-pressure-ratio core compressor. NASA TP-1337, 1978.
3.
SamadA.KimK.Y.GoelT.HaftkaR.T.ShyyW.Multiple surrogate modeling for axial compressor blade shape optimization. J. Propuls. Power, 2008, 24(2), 302–310.
4.
JangC. M.KimK.Y.Applications of numerical optimization techniques to design of axial compressor blades. J. Aerosp. Power, 2007, 22(4), 29–36.
5.
YangL.OuyangH.HuiD. Z.Optimization design and experimental study of low-pressure axial fan with forward-skewed blades. Int. J. Rotary Mach., 2007, 2007, article id 85275, 10 pp.
6.
PierretS.CoelhoR. F.KatoH.Multidisciplinary and multiple operating points shape optimization of three-dimensional compressor blades. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 2007, 33(1), 61–70.
ChenN.ZhangH.XuY.HuangW.Blade parameterization and aerodynamic design optimization for a 3D transonic compressor rotor. J. Therm. Sci., 2007, 16(2), 105–114.
9.
ChenN. X.ZhangH. W.DuH.XuY. J.HuangW. G.Effect of maximum camber location on aerodynamic performance of transonic compressor blades. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2005, Nevada, USA, June 2005, GT2005–68541.
10.
BeniniE.Three-dimensional multi-objective design optimization of a transonic compressor rotor. J. Propuls. Power, 2004, 20(3), 559–565.
11.
KeskinA.BestleD.Application of multi-objective optimization to axial compressor preliminary design. Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2006, 10, 581–589.
12.
WuH.LiQ.ZhouS.Optimization of loaded fan rotor based on through flow model. In Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2007, Montreal, Canada, 2007, GT2007–27603.
13.
SangerN. L.The use of optimization techniques to design-controlled diffusion compressor blading. J. Eng. Power, 1983, 105, 256–264.
14.
BeniniE.ToffoloA.Innovative procedure to mini-mize multi-row compressor blade dynamic loading using rotor-stator interaction optimization. Proc. IMechE, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 2007, 221(A1), 59–66.
15.
PapadimitriouD. I.GiannakoglouK. C.Total pressure loss minimization in turbomachinery cascades using a new continuous adjoint formulation. Proc. IMechE, Part A: J. Power and Energy, 2007, 221(A6), 865–872.
16.
DebK.Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, 1st edition, 2001 (John Wiley & Sons Inc., Chichester, England).
17.
GoelT.VaidyanathanR.HaftkaR.T.ShyyW.QueipoN. V.TuckerK.Response surface approximation of Pareto optimal front in multi-objective optimization. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 2007, 196(4–6), 879–893.
18.
MarlerR. T.AroraJ. S.Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Struct. Multidis-cip. Optim., 2004, 26(6), 369–395.
19.
LiP.KimK.Y.Multiobjective optimization of staggered elliptical pin-fin arrays. Numer. Heat Transf. A, Appl., 2008, 53(4), 418–431.
20.
HusainA.KimK.Y.Optimization of a microchannel heat sink with temperature dependent fluid properties. Appl. Therm. Eng., 2008, 28, 1101–1107.
21.
FoliK.OkabeT.OlhoferM.JinY.SendhoffB.Optimization of micro heat exchanger: CFD, analytical approach and multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2006, 49, 1090–1099.
22.
MarjavaaraB. D.LundstromT. S.GoelT.MackY.ShyyW.Hydraulic turbine diffuser shape optimization by multiple surrogate model approximations Pareto fronts. Trans. ASME, 2007, 129(9), 1228–1240.
23.
Ansys CFX-11.0, 2006, Ansys Inc.
24.
BeheshtiB. H.TeixeiraJ. A.IveyP. C.GhorbanianK.FarhaniehB.Parametric study of tip clearance casing treatment on performance and stability of a transonic axial compressor, J. Turbomach., 2004, 126, 527–535.
25.
JMP 5.1, 2004, SAS Institute, Inc.
26.
McKayM. D.ConoverW. J.BeckmanR. J.A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 1979, 21(2), 239–245.
27.
MyersR. H.MontgomeryD. C.Response surface methodology-process and product optimization using designed experiments, 1995 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York).
28.
MATLAB, The Language of Technical Computing, Release 14, The MathWorks Inc., 2004.
29.
GuintaA. A.Aircraft multidisciplinary design optimization using design of experimental theory and response surface modeling methods. PhD Thesis, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, 1997.
