In this paper, the power of genetic algorithms is exploited to search for the most important groups of events in a risk/reliability model. To this end a two-objective search is formulated in which the decision variables are the groups of events, and the objectives are to maximize the importance of the groups, while minimizing their dimension. This allows the identification of the most important single events, couples of events, triplets, and so forth. Three case studies concerning network systems of increasing complexity are analysed.
HoylandA.RausandM.System reliability theory: models and statistical methods, 1994 (Wiley, Chichester)
3.
CheokM. C.ParryG. W.SherryR. R.Use of importance measures in risk informed applications. Reliability Engng Syst. Saf., 1998, 60, 213–226
4.
MartorellS.SerradellV.VerduG.Safety-related equipment prioritization for reliability centered maintenance purposes based on a plant specific level 1 PSA. Reliability Engng Syst. Saf., 1996, 52, 35–44
5.
BorgonovoE.ApostolakisG. E.A new importance measure for risk-informed decision making. Reliability Engng Syst. Saf., 2001, 72, 193–212
6.
ZioE.PodofilliniL.Accounting for components interactions in the differential importance measure. Reliability Engng Syst. Saf., 2006, 91(2), 1163–1174
7.
ZioE.PodofilliniL.ZilleV.A combination of Monte Carlo simulation and cellular automata for computing the availability of complex network systems. Reliability Engng Syst. Saf., 2006, 91(2), 181–190
8.
FussellJ. B.How to calculate system reliability and safety characteristics. IEEE Trans. Reliability, 1975, R-24(3), 169–174
9.
GebreB. A.Ramirez-MarquezJ. E.Element substitution algorithm for general two-terminal network reliability analyses. IIE Trans., 2007, 39, 265–275
10.
BelegunduA. D.ChandrupatlaT. R.Optimization concepts and applications in engineering, 1999, Ch. 11, pp. 373–381 (Prentice Hall)
11.
HollandJ. H.Adaptation in natural and artificial system, 1975 (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI)
12.
GoldbergD. E.Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning, 1989 (Addison Wesley)
13.
MarseguerraM.ZioE.MartorellS.Basics of genetic algorithms optimization for RAMS applications. Reliability Engng Syst. Saf., 2006, 91(9), 977–991
14.
JoyceP. A.WithersT. A.HicklingP. J.Application of genetic algorithms to optimum offshore plant design. In Proceedings of ESREL 98, Trondheim, Norway, 16–19 June 1998, pp. 665–671
15.
MartorellS.CarlosS.SanchezA.SerradellV.Constrained optimization of test intervals using a steady-state genetic algorithm. Reliability Engng Syst. Saf., 2000, 67, 215–232
16.
MunozA.MartorellS.SerradellV.Genetic algorithms in optimizing surveillance and maintenance of components. Reliability Engng Syst. Saf., 1997, 57, 107–120
17.
MarseguerraM.ZioE.Optimizing maintenance and repair policies via a combination of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation. Reliability Engng Syst. Saf., 2000, 68, 69–83
18.
CoitD. W.SmithA. E.Reliability optimization of series-parallel systems using a genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Reliability, 1996, 45(2), 254–260
19.
HarunuzzamanM.AldemirT.Optimization of standby safety system maintenance schedules in nuclear power plants. Nucl. Technol., 1996, 113, 354–367
20.
CarlosS.MartorellS.VillanuevaJ. F.SerradellV.SánchezA.A multiobjective genetic algorithm for RAMS +C optimization with uncertain variables. In Proceedings of the 2007 European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL 2007), Stavanger, Norway, 25–27 June 2007, pp. 115–121
21.
KonakA.CoitD. W.SmithA. E.Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorialReliability Engng Syst. Saf., 2006, 91(9), 992–1007
22.
SalazarD.RoccoC. M.GalvánB. J.Optimization of constrained multiple-objective reliability problems using evolutionary algorithms. Reliability Engng Syst. Saf., 2006, 91(9), 1057–1070
23.
Giuggioli BusaccaP.MarseguerraM.ZioE.Multiobjective optimization by genetic algorithm: Application to safety systems. Reliability Engng Syst. Saf., 2001, 72, 59–74
24.
ZitzlerE.ThieleL.Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Comput., 1999, 3(4), 257–271
25.
ZitzlerE.Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: methods and applications, 1999 (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich), TIK-Schriftenreihe no. 30, Diss ETH no. 13398 (Shaker Verlag, Germany)
26.
FonsecaC. M.FlemingP. J.Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: Formulation, discussion and generalization. In Genetic algorithms: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference (Ed. ForrestS.), 1993 (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA)
27.
FonsecaC. M.FlemingP. J.An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization. Evolutionary Comput., 1995, 3(1), 1–16
28.
ParksG. T.Multiobjective pressurized water reactor reload core design using genetic algorithm search. Nucl. Sci. Engng, 1997, 124, 178–187
29.
SrinivasN.DebK.Multiobjective function optimization using nondominated sorting genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Comput., 1995, 2(3), 221–248
30.
ToshinskyV. G.SekimotoH.ToshinskyG. I.A method to improve multiobjective genetic algorithm optimization of a self-fuel-providing LMFBR by niche induction among nondominated solutions. Ann. Nucl. Energy, 2000, 27, 397–410
31.
SawaragiY.NakayamaH.TaninoT.Theory of multiobjective optimization, 1985 (Academic Press, Orlando, Florida)
32.
ZioE.BaraldiP.PedroniN.Feature selection for transients classification by a niched Pareto genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 7th International Flins Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence, Genova, Italy, (Eds D. Ruan, P. D'Hondt, P. Fantoni, M. D. Cock, M. Nachtegael, and E. E. Kerre), 2006, pp. 938–945.
