The Dempster—Shafer Theory of Evidence (DST) has been considered as an alternative to probabilistic modelling if both a large amount of uncertainty and a conservative treatment of this uncertainty are necessary. Both requirements are normally met in early design stages. Expert estimates replace field data and hardly any accurate test results are available. Therefore, a conservative uncertainty treatment is beneficial to assure a reliable and safe design. The present paper explores the applicability of DST which merges interval-based and probabilistic uncertainty modelling on a fault tree analysis from the automotive area. The system under investigation, an automatic transmission from the ZF AS Tronic series is still in the development stage. Expert estimates and the Monte Carlo propagation of the resulting mass function through the system model are used to obtain the uncertainty on the system failure probability. An exploratory sensitivity based on a non-specifity measure indicates which components contribute to the overall model uncertainty. The results are used to predict if the system complies with a given target failure measure.
International Electrotechnical Commission.IEC 61508 Functional safety of electrical/ electronic/ programmable electronic safety-related systems - Part 1 to Part 7, 2001 (IEC, Geneva)
2.
KochsH.-D.Key factors of dependability of mechatronic units: mechatronic dependability panel session on risk management and dependability - what are the key factors? 28th Annual International Computer Software and Application Conference (COMPSAC 2004), Hong Kong, China, 2004, pp. 584–586
3.
JägerP.BertscheB.An approach for early reliability evaluation of mechatronic systems. In European Conference on Safety and Reliability - ESREL 2005 (Ed. K. Kolowrocki), Gdynia-Sopot-Gdansk, Poland, 2005, pp. 925–932
4.
DempsterA. P.Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Annls Math. Statistics, 1967, 38, 325–339
5.
ShaferG.A mathematical theory of evidence, 1976 (Princeton University Press, Princeton)
6.
FersonS.KreinovichV.GinzburgL.MyersD. S.SentzK.Constructing probability boxes and Dempster-Shafer structures. SAND2002–4015, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, USA, 2003
7.
BaudritC.HéliasA.PerrotN.Uncertainty analysis in food engineering involving imprecision and randomness. In Fifth International Symposium on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, ISIPTA'07 (Ed. G. D. Cooman, J. Vejnarova and M. Zaffalon) Prague, Czech Republic, 2007.
8.
RakowskyU. K.GochtU.Modelling of uncertainties in reliability centred maintenance: a Dempster-Shafer approach. In European Conference on Safety and Reliability - ESREL 2007 (Ed. A. Terje and J. E. Vinnem) Stavanger, Norway, 2007, pp. 739–745.
9.
UtkinL. V.CoolenF. P. A.Imprecise reliability: An introductory overview. Computational intelligence in reliability engineering (Ed. LevitinG.), 2007, pp. 261–306 (Springer, New York, USA)
10.
RakowskyU. K.Some notes on probabilities and nonprobabilistic reliability measures. In European Conference on Safety and Reliability - ESREL 2005, (Ed. K. Kolowrocki), 2005, pp. 1645–1654 Gdynia-Sopot-Gdansk, Poland.
11.
KlirG. J.Uncertainty and Information: foundations of generalized information theory, 2005, (John Wiley, New York)
12.
SchneeweissW. G.The fault tree method, 1999 (LiLoLe Publishing, Hagen)
13.
GuthM. A. S.A probabilistic foundation for vagueness and imprecision in fault-tree analysis. IEEE Trans Reliability, 1991, 40(5), 563–571
14.
TononF.BernardiniA.MamminoA.Determination of parameters range in rock engineering by means of random set theory. Reliability Engng System Safety, 2000, 70(3), 241–261
15.
ChinW. C.RamachandranV.ChoC. W.Evidence sets approach for web service fault diagnosis. Malaysian J. Computer Sci., 2000, 13(1), 84–89
16.
CarrerasC.WalkerI. D.Interval methods for fault-tree analyses in robotics. IEEE Trans Reliability, 2001, 50(1), 3–11
17.
SingerD.A fuzzy set approach to fault tree and reliability analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1990, 34(2), 145–155
18.
SentzK.FersonS.Combination of evidence in dempster-Shafer theory. SAND2002–0835, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, USA, 2002
19.
YagerR. R.On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules. Inf. Sci., 1987, 41, 93–137
20.
EmbrechtsP.LindskogF.McNeilA.Modelling dependence with copulas and applications to risk management. Handbook of Heavy Tailed Distributions in Finance (Ed. RachevS.), 2003, pp. 329–384 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands)
21.
FersonS.HajagosJ.BerleantD.JianzhongZ.Troy TuckerW.GinzburgL.OberkampfW.Dependence in Dempster-Shafer theory and probability bounds analysis.SAND2004–3072, 2004, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, USA
22.
FetzT.OberguggenbergerM.Propagation of uncertainty through multivariate functions in the framework of sets of probability measures. Reliability Engng and System Safety, 2004, 85(1–3), 73–87
23.
CousoI.MoralS.WalleyP.Examples of independence for imprecise Probabilities. In First International Symposium on Imprecise probabilities and their Applications (ISIPTA'99) (Ed. D. Cooman et al.), Lugano, Switzerland, 1999, pp. 121–130.
24.
AbellanJ.MoralS.A non-specificity measure for convex sets of probability distributions. Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2000, 8(3), 357–367
25.
FersonS.TuckerW. T.Sensitivity in risk analyses with uncertain numbers. SAND2006–2801, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, USA, 2006
26.
HallJ. W.Sensitivity indices for imprecise probability distributions 4th International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output SAMO2004. Santa Fe, USA, 2004, electronic proceedings (7pp.)
27.
HeltonJ. C.JohnsonJ. D.OberkampfW. L.Sensitivity analysis in conjunction with evidence theory representations of epistemic uncertainty 4th International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output (SAMO 2004), Santa Fe, Germany, 2004
28.
TononF.Using random set theory to propagate epistemic uncertainty through a mechanical system. Reliability Engng System Safety, 2004, 85(1–3), 169–181
