Near infrared spectra obtained from leaf surfaces of Eucalyptus grandis seedlings were calibrated against physiological measurements of plant water stress, namely: relative water content, leaf water potential and stomatal conductance. In a controlled environment facility, spectral data were obtained from both abaxial and adaxial leaf surfaces as well as upper and lower leaves in the stem. The strongest coefficients of determination using cross-validation were r2CV = 0.85 for relative water content, r2CV = 0.74 for leaf water potential and r2CV = 0.80 for stomatal conductance. The use of a portable NIR instrument enabled the rapid assessment of physiological status of seedlings and would enable in situ, non-destructive, high-throughput monitoring of drought and recovery in the field. This would be particularly useful for non-destructive measurement in longitudinal studies.
MederR.GallagherS.S.KimberleyM.O.UprichardM. and MackieK.L.“Prediction of wood chip and pulp and paper properties via multivariate analysis of spectral data”, presented at 48th Appita Annual General Conference, 2–6 May, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 479–484 (1994).
3.
MederR.GallagherS.S.MackieK.L.BöhlerH-P. and MeglenR.R.“Rapid determination of the chemical composition of Pinus radiata by PLS modelling of transmission and diffuse reflectance FTIR spectra”, Holzforschung53(3), 261–266 (1999). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/HF.1999.044
4.
BattenG., “Plant analysis using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy: The potential and the limitations”, Aust. J. Exp. Agric.38(7), 697 (1998). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EA97146
5.
FoleyW.J.McIlweeA.LawlerI.AragonesL.WoolnoughA.P. and BerdingN., “Ecological applications of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy—a tool for rapid, cost effective prediction of the composition of plant and animal tissues and aspects of animal performance”, Oecologia116, 293 (1998). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420050591
6.
ChenM.GlazB.GilbertR.A.DaroubS.H.BartonF.E. and WanY.“Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy analysis of phosphorus in sugarcane leaves”, Agron. J.94(6), 1324 (2002). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.1324
7.
ThummA.RiddellM.NanayakkaraB.HarringtonJ. and MederR., “Near infrared hyperspectral imaging applied to mapping chemical composition in wood samples”, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc., 18(6), 507–515 (2010).
8.
SerbinS.P.DillawayD.N.KrugerE.L. and TownsendP.A., “Leaf optical properties reflect variation in photosynthetic metabolism and its sensitivity to temperature”, J. Exp. Bot.63(1), 489–502 (2012). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err294
De BeiR.CozzolinoD.SullivanW.CynkarW.FuentesS.DambergsR.PechJ. and TyermanS., “Nondestructive measurements of grapevine water potential using near infrared spectroscopy”, Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research17, 62 (2011). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2010.00117.x
11.
CozzolinoD.RoumeliotisS. and EglintonJ., “Monitoring water uptake in whole barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) grain during steeping using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy”, J. Food Eng.114(4), 545 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.09.010
12.
OkamuraN.K.ShimomachiT.TakemasaT. and TakakuraT., “Non-destructive detection of water stress in tomato plants by NIR spectroscopy”, Environ. Cont. Biol.39(2), 75 (2001). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2525/ecb1963.39.75
13.
SuhandyD.KhuriyatiN. and MatsuokaT., “Determination of leaf water potential in tomoato plants using NIR spectroscopy for water stress management”, Environ. Cont. Biol.44(4), 75–85 (2006). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2525/ecb.44.279
14.
PossJ.A.RussellW.B. and GrieveC.M., “Estimating yields of salt- and water-stressed forages with remote sensing in the visible and near infrared”, J. Environ. Qual.35(4), 1060 (2006). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2005.0204
15.
Pérez-HarguindeguyN.DíazS.GarnierE.LavorelS.PoorterH.JaureguiberryP.Bret-HarteM.S.CornwellW.K.CraineJ.M.GurvichD.E.UrcelayC.VeneklaasE.J.ReichP.B.PoorterL.WrightI.J.RayP.EnricoL.PausasJ.G.de VosA.C.BuchmannN.FunesG.QuétierF.HodgsonJ.G.ThompsonK.MorganH.D.ter SteegeH.van der HeijdenM.J.A.SackL.BlonderB.PoschlodP.VaierettiM.A.ContiG.StaverA.C.AquinoS., and CornelissenJ.H.C., “New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide”, Aust. J. Bot.61, 137–234 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT12225
16.
BarrsH.D., and WeatherleyP.E., “A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves”, Aust. J. Biol. Sci.15, 413–428 (1962).
17.
GianolaG., “On selection criteria and estimation of parameters when the variance is heterogeneous.”Theor. Appl. Genet.72(5), 671–677 (1986). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289007
18.
FalconerD.S., Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd Edn.Longman Scientific and Technical, New York (1993).
19.
WhiteT.L., “Genetic parameter estimates and breeding value predictions: Issues and implications in tree improvement programs.” in Tree Improvement for Sustainable Tropical Forestry, Ed by DietersM.J.MathesonA.C.NiklesD.G.HarwoodC.E.WalkerS.M. Proceedings of the QFRI-IUFRO Conference, Caloundra, Queensland, Australia, pp. 110–117 (1996).
20.
OsorioL.F.WhiteT.L.HuberD.A., “Age–age and trait– trait correlations for Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden and their implications for optimal selection age and design of clonal trials”, Theor. Appl. Genet., 106, 735–743 (2003). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-1124-9
21.
SavitzkyA. and GolayM.J.E., “Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures”, Anal. Chem.36(8), 1627 (1964). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac60214a047
22.
TsuchikawaS. and SchwanningerM., “Review of recent near-infrared research for wood and paper (Part 2)”, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev.48(7), 560–587 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2011.621079
23.
HumphreysJ.R.O'Reilly-WapstraJ.M.HarbardJ.L.DaviesN.W.GriffinA.R.JordanG.J.PottsB.M., “Discrimination between seedlings of Eucalyptus globulus, E. nitens and their F1 hybrid using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and foliar oil content”, Silvae Genet.57, 262–269 (2008).
24.
AdedipeO.E.Dawson-AndohB.SlahorJ. and OsbornL., “Classification of red oak (Quercus rubra) and white oak (Quercus alba) wood using a near infrared spectrometer and soft independent modelling of class analogies”, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc.16, 49–57 (2008). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.760
25.
EspinozaJ.A.HodgeG.R. and DvorakW.S., “The potential use of near infrared spectroscopy to discriminate between different pine species and their hybrids”, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc.18, 437–447 (2012). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.1006
26.
AbasoloM.LeeD.J.RaymondC.MederR. and ShepherdM., “Deviant near-infrared spectra allows identification of Corymbia hybrids”, For. Ecol. Manag.304, 121–131 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.04.040
27.
MederR.KainD.EbdonN.MacdonellP. and BrawnerJ.T., “Identifying hybridisation in Pinus species using near infrared spectroscopy of foliage”, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc.22, 337–345 (2014). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.1127
28.
SchwanningerM.RodriguesJ.C. and FacklerK., “A review of band assignments in near infrared spectra of wood and wood components”, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc.19(5), 287–308 (2011). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.955
29.
HuntE.R.RockB.N. and NobelP.S., “Measurement of leaf relative water-content by infrared reflectance”, Remote Sens. Environ.22(3), 429–435 (1987). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(87)90094-0
