Abstract
In excitation–emission fluorescence spectroscopy, the simultaneous quantitative prediction and qualitative resolution of mixtures of fluorophores using chemometrics is a major challenge because of the scattering and reabsorption effects (turbidity) presented mainly in biomaterials. The measured fluorescence spectra are distorted by multiple scattering and reabsorption events in the surrounding medium, thereby diminishing the performance of the commonly used three-way resolution methods such as parallel factor (PARAFAC) analysis or multivariate curve resolutionalternating least squares (MCR-ALS). In this work we show that spectral loadings and concentration profiles from model mixtures provided using PARAFAC and MCR-ALS are severely distorted by reabsorption and scattering phenomena, although both models fit rather well the experimental data in terms of percentage of the explained variance. The method to correct the fluorescence excitation–emission matrix (EEM) consisted in measuring the optical properties (absorption parameter μa, scattering parameter μs, and anisotropy factor
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
