Seeding strategies have strong influences on the success of viral marketing campaigns, but previous studies using computer simulations and analytical models have produced conflicting recommendations about the optimal seeding strategy. This study compares four seeding strategies in two complementary small-scale field experiments, as well as in one real-life viral marketing campaign involving more than 200,000 customers of a mobile phone service provider. The empirical results show that the best seeding strategies can be up to eight times more successful than other seeding strategies. Seeding to well-connected people is the most successful approach because these attractive seeding points are more likely to participate in viral marketing campaigns. This finding contradicts a common assumption in other studies. Well-connected people also actively use their greater reach but do not have more influence on their peers than do less well-connected people.
AndersonRoy M., and MayRobert M. (1991), Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control.New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
AralSinan, MuchnikLev, and SundararajanArun (2009), “Distinguishing Influence-Based Contagion from Homophily-Driven Diffusion in Dynamic Networks,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(51), 21544–49.
3.
AralSinan, MuchnikLev, and SundararajanArun (2011), “Engineering Social Contagions: Optimal Network Seeding and Incentive Strategies,” (accessed July 21, 2011), [available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1770982].
4.
ArndtJohan (1967), “Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product,”Journal of Marketing Research, 4(August), 291–95.
5.
BampoMauro, EwingMichael T., MatherDineli R., StewartDavid, and WallaceMark (2008), “The Effects of the Social Structure of Digital Networks on Viral Marketing Performance,”Information Systems Research, 19(3), 273–90.
6.
BeckerMarshall H. (1970), “Sociometric Location and Innovativeness: Reformulation and Extension of the Diffusion Model,”American Sociological Review, 35(2), 267–82.
BergerJonah, and SchwartzEric (2011), “What Do People Talk About? Drivers of Immediate and Ongoing Word-of-Mouth,”Journal of Marketing Research, forthcoming.
BurtRonald S. (1987), “Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion Versus Structural Equivalence,”American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1287–1335.
11.
ColemanJames S., KatzElihu, and MenzelHerbert (1966), Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study.Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
12.
CostenbaderElizabeth, and ValenteThomas W. (2003), “The Stability of Centrality Measures When Networks Are Sampled,”Social Networks, 25(4), 283–307.
13.
De BruynArnaud, and LilienGary L. (2008), “A Multi-Stage Model of Word-of-Mouth Influence Through Viral Marketing,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 151–63.
14.
DoddsPeter S., and WattsDuncan J. (2004), “Universal Behavior in a Generalized Model of Contagion,”Physical Review Letters, 92(21), 1–5.
15.
FestingerLeon (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
GaleottiAndrea, and GoyalSanjeev (2009), “Influencing the Influencers: A Theory of Strategic Diffusion,”RAND Journal of Economics, 40(3), 509–532.
17.
GladwellMalcolm (2002), The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference.Boston: Back Bay Books.
18.
GodesDavid, and MayzlinDana (2009), “Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: Evidence from a Field Study,”Marketing Science, 28(4), 721–39.
19.
GoldenbergJacob, HanSangman, LehmannDonald R., and HongJae Weon (2009), “The Role of Hubs in the Adoption Process,”Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 1–13.
20.
GranovetterMark S. (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,”American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–80.
21.
GranovetterMark S. (1985), “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,”American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
22.
HanakiNobuyuki, PeterhanslAlexander, DoddsPeter S., and WattsDuncan J. (2007), “Cooperation in Evolving Social Networks,”Management Science, 53(7), 1036–50.
23.
HannIl-Horn, HuiKai-Lung, LeeSang-Yong T., and PngIvan PL. (2008), “Consumer Privacy and Marketing Avoidance: A Static Model,”Management Science, 54(6), 1094–1103.
24.
HillShawndra, ProvostFoster, and VolinskyChris (2006), “Network-Based Marketing: Identifying Likely Adopters via Consumer Networks,”Statistical Science, 21(2), 256–76.
25.
HinzOliver, and SpannMartin (2008), “The Impact of Information Diffusion on Bidding Behavior in Secret Reserve Price Auctions,”Information Systems Research, 19(3), 351–68.
26.
IyengarRaghuram, BulteChristophe Van den, and ValenteThomas W. (2011), “Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion,”Marketing Science, 30(2), 195–212.
27.
IyengarSheena S., and LepperMark (2000), “When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 995–1006.
28.
JainDipak, MahajanVijay, and MullerEitan (1995), “An Approach for Determining Optimal Product Sampling for the Diffusion of a New Product,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(2), 124–35.
29.
KalishShlomo, MahajanVijay, and MullerEitan (1995), “Waterfall and Sprinkler New-Product Strategies in Competitive Global Markets,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 105–119.
30.
KemperJohn T. (1980), “On the Identification of Superspreaders for Infectious Disease,”Mathematical Biosciences, 48(1/2), 111–27.
31.
KissChristine, and BichlerMartin (2008), “Identification of Influencers—Measuring Influence in Customer Networks,”Decision Support Systems, 46(1), 233–53.
32.
LambertDiane (1992), “Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression, with an Application to Defects in Manufacturing,”Technometrics, 34(1), 1–14.
33.
LeskovecJure, AdamicLada A., and HubermanBernardo A. (2007), “The Dynamics of Viral Marketing,”ACM Transactions on the Web, 1(1), 228–37.
34.
LibaiBarak, MullerEitan, and PeresRenana (2005), “The Role of Seeding in Multi-Market Entry,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22(4), 375–93.
35.
LinNan (1976), Foundations of Social Research.New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
MullahyJohn (1986), “Specification and Testing of Some Modified Count Data Models,”Journal of Econometrics, 33(3), 341–65.
37.
PorterConstance E., and DonthuNaveen (2008), “Cultivating Trust and Harvesting Value in Virtual Communities,”Management Science, 54(1), 113–28.
38.
PorterLance, and GolanGuy J. (2006), “From Subservient Chickens to Brawny Men: A Comparison of Viral Advertising to Television Advertising,”Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 30–38.
TrusovMichael, BodapatiAnand, and BucklinRandolph E. (2010), “Determining Influential Users in Internet Social Networks,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(August), 643–58.
48.
Van den BulteChristophe (2010), “Opportunities and Challenges in Studying Consumer Networks,” in The Connected Customer, WuytsS., DekimpeM.G., GijsbrechtsE., and PietersR., eds. London: Routledge, 7–35.
49.
Van den BulteChristophe, and JoshiYogesh V. (2007), “New Product Diffusion with Influentials and Imitators,”Marketing Science, 26(3), 400–421.
50.
Van den Bulte, and LilienGary L. (2001), “Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion Versus Marketing Effort,”American Journal of Sociology, 106(5), 1409–1435.
51.
Van den Bulte, and WuytsStefan (2007), Social Networks and Marketing.Cambridge, MA: MSI Relevant Knowledge Series.
52.
Van der LansRalf, van BruggenGerrit, EliashbergJehoshua, and WierengaBerend (2010), “A Viral Branching Model for Predicting the Spread of Electronic Word-of-Mouth,”Marketing Science, 29(2), 348–65.
53.
WattsDuncan J. (2004), “The ‘New’ Science of Networks,”Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 243–70.
54.
WattsDuncan J., and DoddsPeter S. (2007), “Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441–58.
55.
WattsDuncan J., and PerettiJonah (2007), “Viral Marketing for the Real World,”Harvard Business Review, 85(5), 22–23.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
