Social tagging is a new way to share and categorize online content that enables users to express their thoughts, perceptions, and feelings with respect to diverse concepts. In social tagging, content is connected through user-generated keywords—“tags”—and is readily searchable through these tags. The rich associative information that social tagging provides marketers new opportunities to infer brand associative networks. This article investigates how the information contained in social tags can act as a proxy measure for brand performance and can predict the financial valuation of a firm. Using data collected from a social tagging and bookmarking website, Delicious, the authors examine social tagging data for 44 firms across 14 markets. After controlling for accounting metrics, media citations, and other user-generated content, they find that social tag–based brand management metrics capturing brand familiarity, favorability of associations, and competitive overlaps of brand associations can explain unanticipated stock returns. In addition, they find that in managing brand equity, it is more important for strong brands to enhance category dominance, whereas it is more critical for weak brands to enhance connectedness. These findings suggest a new way for practitioners to track, measure, and manage intangible brand equity; proactively improve brand performance; and influence a firm's financial performance.
AakerDavid A., and JacobsonRobert, (2001), “The Value Relevance of Brand Attitude in High-Technology Markets,”Journal of Marketing Research, 38(November), 485–93.
2.
AakerDavid A., and Gary ShansbyJ., (1982), “Positioning Your Product,”Business Horizons, 25(3), 56–62.
3.
AlbaJoseph W., and Wesley HutchinsonJ., (1987), “Dimensions of Consumer Expertise,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 411–53.
4.
AmesMorgan, and NaamanMor, (2007), “Why We Tag: Motivations for Annotation in Mobile and Online Media,” in CHI ‘07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 971–98.
5.
BaronReuben M., and KennyDavid A., (1986), “Moderator-Mediator Variables Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–82.
6.
BharadwajSundar G., TuliKapil R., and BonfrerAndre, (2011), “The Impact of Brand Quality on Shareholder Wealth,”Journal of Marketing, 75(September), 88–104.
7.
BrucksMerrie, (1985), “A Typology of Consumer Knowledge Content,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13, LutzRichard J., ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 58–63.
8.
BuchananLauranne, SimmonsCarolyn J., and BickartBarbara A., (1999), “Brand Equity Dilution: Retailer Display and Context Brand Effects,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36(August), 34–55.
9.
BurkeRaymond R., and SrullThomas K., (1988), “Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory for Advertising,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15(1), 55–68.
10.
CarhartMark, (1997), “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance,”Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82.
11.
ChevalierJudith, and MayzlinDina, (2006), “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43(August), 345–54.
12.
CohenJoel B., and BasuKanul, (1987), “Alternative Models of Categorization: Towards a Contingent Processing Framework,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 455–72.
EhrenbergAndrew S.C., BarnardNeil, and ScrivenJohn, (1997), “Differentiation or Salience,”Journal of Advertising Research, 37(November/December), 82–91.
15.
EhrenbergAndrew S.C., GoodhardtGerald J., and Patrick BarwiseT., (1990), “Double Jeopardy Revisited,”Journal of Marketing, 54(July), 82–91.
16.
FamaEugene, (1998), “Market Efficiency, Long-Term Returns, and Behavioral Finance,”Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 283–306.
17.
FamaEugene, and FrenchKenneth, (1993), “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds,”Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.
18.
FaustKatherine, (1997), “Centrality in Affiliation Networks,”Social Networks, 19(2), 157–91.
19.
FleissJ.L., (1971), “Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement Among Many Raters,”Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–82.
FountainTrevor, and LapataMirella, (2010), “Meaning Representation in Natural Language Categorization,” in Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, TaatgenNiels, and van RijnHedderik, eds. Amsterdam: Cognitive Science Society, 1916–21.
22.
FuWai-Tat, KannampallilThomas, KangRuogo, and HeJibo, (2010), “Semantic Imitation in Social Tagging,”ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 17(3), 1–37.
23.
Gregan-PaxtonJennifer, and JohnDeborah Roedder, (1997), “Consumer Learning by Analogy: A Model of Internal Knowledge Transfer,”Journal of Consumer Research, 24(3), 266–84.
24.
Griffiths ThomasL., SteyversMark, and TenenbaumJoshua B., (2007), “Topics in Semantic Representation,”Psychological Review, 114(2), 211–44.
25.
HanYoung Jee, NunesJoseph C., and DrèzeXavier, (2010), “Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence,”Journal of Marketing, 74(July), 15–30.
26.
HobergGerard, and PhilipsGordon, (2010), “Product Market Synergies and Competition in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Text-Based Analysis,”Review of Financial Studies, 23(10), 3773–3811.
27.
Ho-DacNga N., CarsonStephen J., and MooreWilliam L., (2013), “The Effects of Positive and Negative Online Customer Reviews: Do Brand Strength and Category Maturity Matter?”Journal of Marketing, 77(November), 37–53.
28.
HoefflerSteve, and KellerKevin L., (2003), “The Marketing Advantages of Strong Brands,”Journal of Brand Management, 10(6), 421–45.
JacobyJacob, SyzabilloGeorge J., and Busato-SchachJacqeline, (1977), “Information Acquisition Behavior in Brand Choice Situations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 3(4), 209–216.
31.
JohnDeborah Roedder, LokenBarbara, and JoinerChristopher, (1998), “The Negative Impact of Extensions: Can Flagship Products Be Diluted?”Journal of Marketing, 62(January), 19–32.
32.
JohnDeborah Roedder, LokenBarbara, KimKyeongheui, and MongaAlokparna Basu, (2006), “Brand Concept Maps: A Methodology for Identifying Brand Association Networks,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43(November), 549–63.
33.
KaplanAndreas M., and HaenleinMichael, (2010), “Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media,”Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
34.
KellerKevin Lane, (1987), “Memory Factors in Advertising: The Effect of Advertising Retrieval Cues on Brand Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 316–33.
35.
KellerKevin Lane, (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,”Journal of Marketing, 57(January), 1–22.
36.
KellerKevin Lane, SternthalBrian, and TyboutAlice, (2002), “Three Questions You Need to Ask About Your Brand,”Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 80–89.
37.
KörnerChristian, BenzDominik, HothoAndreas, StrohmaierMarkus, and StummeGerd, (2010), “Stop Thinking, Start Tagging: Tag Semantics Emerge from Collaborative Verbosity,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web.New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 521–30.
38.
KothariS.P., ShuSusan, and WysockiPeter D., (2009), “Do Managers Withhold Bad News?”Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1), 241–76.
39.
LeRoyStephen, (1989), “Efficient Capital Markets and Martingales,”Journal of Economic Literature, 27(4), 1583–1621.
40.
LiuYong, (2006), “Word of Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue,”Journal of Marketing, 70(July), 74–89.
41.
LuoXueming, (2009), “Quantifying the Long-Term Impact of Negative Word of Mouth on Cash Flows and Stock Prices,”Marketing Science, 28(1), 148–65.
42.
MacInnisDeborah J., and NakamotoKent, (1992), “Factors That Influence Consumers’ Evaluations of Brand Extensions,” working paper, Karl Eller School of Management, University of Arizona.
43.
MedinDouglas L., and SchafferMarguerite M., (1978), Context Theory of Classification Learning,”Psychological Review, 85 (3), 207–238.
44.
MikaPeter, (2007), “Ontologies Are on Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics,”Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 5(1), 5–15.
45.
MizikNatalie, and JacobsonRobert, (2004), “Stock Return Response Modeling,” in Assessing Marketing Strategy Performance, MoormanChristine, and LehmannDonald R., eds. Boston: Marketing Science Institute, 29–46.
46.
MizikNatalie, and JacobsonRobert, (2008), “The Financial Value Impact of Perceptual Brand Attributes,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47(February), 15–32.
47.
MizikNatalie, and JacobsonRobert, (2009), “Financial Markets Research in Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, 46(May), 320–24.
48.
NedungadiPrakash, (1990), “Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice Without Altering Brand Evaluations,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 263–76.
49.
NetzerOded, FeldmanRonen, GoldenbergJacob, and MosheFresco, (2012), “Mine Your Own Business: Market Structure Surveillance Through Text Mining,”Marketing Science, 31(3), 521–43.
RobuValentin, HalpinHarry, and ShepherdHana, (2009), “Emergence of Consensus and Shared Vocabularies in Collaborative Tagging Systems,”ACM Transactions on the Web, 3(4), 14:1–14:34.
SmallwoodDenise E., and ConliskJohn, (1979), “Product Quality in Markets Where Consumers Are Imperfectly Informed,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(1), 1–23.
54.
SrivastavaRajendra K., and ShockerAllan D., (1991), “Brand Equity: A Perspective on Its Meaning and Measurement,” Report No. 91-124, Marketing Science Institute.
55.
StrohmaierMarkus, KörnerChristian, KernRoman, (2010), “Why Do Users Tag? Detecting Users’ Motivation for Tagging in Social Tagging Systems,” in Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Palo Alto, CA: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 339–42.
56.
SujanMita, and BettmanJames R., (1989), “The Effects of Brand Positioning Strategies on Consumers’ Brand and Category Perceptions: Some Insights from Schema Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 26(November), 454–67.
57.
TellisGerard J., and JohnsonJoseph, (2007), “The Value of Quality,”Marketing Science, 26(6), 758–73.
58.
TirunillaiSeshadri, and TellisGerard J., (2012), “Does Chatter Really Matter? Dynamics of User-Generated Content and Stock Performance,”Marketing Science, 31(2), 198–215.
WhiteHalbert, (1980), “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity,”Econometrica, 48(4), 817–38.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
