Product design is a source of competitive advantage for companies and is an important driver of company performance. Drawing on an extensive literature review and consumer interviews, the authors define product design and its dimensions. Using data from three samples (6,418 U.S. consumers and 1,083 and 583 European consumers), the authors develop and validate a new scale to measure product design along the dimensions of aesthetics, functionality, and symbolism. In addition, they investigate the impact of these design dimensions on purchase intention, word of mouth, and willingness to pay. The results indicate that the design dimensions positively influence willingness to pay and also have a positive effect on purchase intention and word of mouth, both directly and indirectly through brand attitude.
AakerJennifer L.,(1999), “The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression in Persuasion,”Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (February), 45–57.
2.
AkdenizM. Billur, CalantoneRoger J., and VoorheesClay M. (2013), “Signaling Quality: An Examination of the Effects of Marketing- and Nonmarketing-Controlled Signals on Perceptions of Automotive Brand Quality,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 728–43.
3.
AndersonE.W. (1998), “Customer Satisfaction and Word of Mouth,”Journal of Service Research, 1 (1), 5–17.
4.
BabinBarry J., DardenWilliam R., and GriffinMitch (1994), “Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value,”Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (4), 644–56.
5.
BagozziRichard P. and YiYoujae (1988), “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1), 74–94.
6.
BagozziRichard P. and YiYoujae (2012), “Specification, Evaluation, and Interpretation of Structural Equation Models,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40 (1), 8–34.
7.
BaoYongchuan, BaoYeqing, and ShengShibin (2011), “Motivating Purchase of Private Brands: Effects of Store Image, Product Signatureness, and Quality Variation,”Journal of Business Research, 64 (2), 220–26.
8.
BargeScott and GehlbachHunter (2012), “Using the Theory of Satisficing to Evaluate the Quality of Survey Data,”Research in Higher Education, 53 (2), 182–200.
9.
BaronReuben M. and KennyDavid A. (1986), “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173–82.
10.
BatraRajeev and AhtolaOlli T. (1990), “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes,”Marketing Letters, 2 (2), 159–70.
11.
BatraRajeev, LenkPeter, and WedelMichel (2010), “Brand Extension Strategy Planning: Empirical Estimation of Brand–Category Personality Fit and Atypicality,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (April), 335–47.
12.
BelkRussell W.,(1988), “Possessions and the Extended Self,”Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 139–68.
13.
BergkvistLars and RossiterJohn R. (2007), “The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item Versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (May), 175–84.
14.
BlochPeter H.,(1995), “Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response,”Journal of Marketing, 59 (July), 16–29.
15.
BlochPeter H.,(2011), “Product Design and Marketing: Reflections After Fifteen Years,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (3), 378–80.
16.
BlochPeter H., BrunelFrédéric F., and ArnoldTodd J. (2003), “Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (4), 551–65.
17.
BoztepeSuzan (2007), “User Value: Competing Theories and Models,”International Journal of Design, 1 (2), 55–63.
18.
BrakusJ.J., SchmittBernd H., and ZarantonelloLia (2009), “Brand Experience: What Is It? How Is It Measured? Does It Affect Loyalty?”Journal of Marketing, 73 (May), 52–68.
19.
CampbellDonald T. and FiskeDonald W. (1959), “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait–Multimethod Matrix,”Psychological Bulletin, 56 (2), 81–105.
20.
CandiMarina (2010), “Benefits of Aesthetic Design as an Element of New Service Development,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27 (7), 1047–64.
21.
ChangTung-Zong and WildtAlbert R. (1994), “Price, Product Information, and Purchase Intention: An Empirical Study,”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22 (1), 16–27.
22.
CheemaAmar and KaikatiAndrew M. (2010), “The Effect of Need for Uniqueness on Word of Mouth,”Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (June), 553–63.
23.
ChitturiRavindra, RaghunathanRajagopal, and MahajanVijay (2008), “Delight by Design: The Role of Hedonic Versus Utilitarian Benefits,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (May), 48–63.
24.
ChurchillGilbert A.Jr. (1979), “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (February), 64–73.
25.
CoulterKeith S. and CoulterRobin A. (2005), “Size Does Matter: The Effects of Magnitude Representation Congruency on Price Perceptions and Purchase Likelihood,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15 (1), 64–76.
26.
CreusenMariëlle E.H. and SchoormansJan P.L. (2005), “The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22 (1), 63–81.
27.
DahlDarren W.,(2011), “Clarity in Defining Product Design: Inspiring Research Opportunities for the Design Process,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (3), 425–27.
DharRavi and WertenbrochKlaus (2000), “Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods,”Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (February), 60–71.
30.
Di BenedettoC.A. (2011), “From the Editor,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (3), 320.
31.
ErdemTülin, SwaitJoffre, and ValenzuelaAna (2006), “Brands as Signals: A Cross-Country Validation Study,”Journal of Marketing, 70 (January), 34–49.
32.
FerraroRosellina, KirmaniAmna, and MatherlyTed (2013), “Look at Me! Look at Me! Conspicuous Brand Usage, Self-Brand Connection, and Dilution,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (August), 477–88.
33.
FornellClaes and LarckerDavid F. (1981), “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,”Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (February), 39–50.
34.
FuchsChristoph and DiamantopoulosAdamantios (2009), “Using Single-Item Measures for Construct Measurement in Management Research: Conceptual Issues and Application Guidelines,”Die Betriebswirtschaft, 69 (2), 195–210.
35.
GatignonHubert and RobertsonThomas S. (1986), “An Exchange Theory Model of Interpersonal Communication,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13, LutzRichard J., ed. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 534–38.
36.
GemserGerda and LeendersMark A.A.M. (2001), “How Integrating Industrial Design in the Product Development Process Impacts on Company Performance,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18 (1), 28–38.
37.
GerbingDavid W. and AndersonJames C. (1988), “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment,”Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (May), 186–92.
38.
HerbstKenneth C., FinkelEli J., AllanDavid, and FitzsimonsGráinne M. (2012), “On the Dangers of Pulling a Fast One: Advertisement Disclaimer Speed, Brand Trust, and Purchase Intention,”Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (5), 909–919.
39.
HerbstKenneth C., FinkelEli J., and VeryzerRobert W. (2005), “The Impact of Industrial Design Effectiveness on Corporate Financial Performance,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22 (1), 3–21.
40.
HoeggJoAndrea and AlbaJoseph W. (2011), “Seeing Is Believing (Too Much): The Influence of Product Form on Perceptions of Functional Performance,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (3), 346–59.
41.
HoeggJoAndrea, AlbaJoseph W., and DahlDarren W. (2010), “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Influence of Aesthetics on Product Feature Judgments,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20 (4), 419–30.
42.
HollinsBill and PughStuart (1990), Successful Product Design: What to Do and When. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
43.
HoltDouglas B.,(1997), “Poststructuralist Lifestyle Analysis: Conceptualizing the Social Patterning of Consumption in Postmodernity,”Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (4), 326–50.
44.
HomburgChristian (1991), “Cross-Validation and Information Criteria in Causal Modeling,”Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (May), 137–44.
45.
HuLi-tse and BentlerPeter M. (1995), “Evaluating Model Fit,” in Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Application, HoyleRick H., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 76–99.
46.
JiaJayson Shi, ShivBaba, and RaoSanjay (2014), “The Product-Agnosia Effect: How More Visual Impressions Affect Product Distinctiveness in Comparative Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (2), 342–60.
47.
JöreskogKarl G. and SörbomDag (1982), “Recent Developments in Structural Equation Modeling,”Journal of Marketing Research, 19 (November), 404–416.
48.
KarjalainenToni-Matti and SneldersDirk (2010), “Designing Visual Recognition for the Brand,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27 (1), 6–22.
49.
KellerKevin L.,(2003), “Brand Synthesis: The Multidimensionality of Brand Knowledge,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (4), 595–600.
50.
KellerKevin L. and LehmannDonald R. (2006), “Brands and Branding: Research Findings and Future Priorities,”Marketing Science, 25 (6), 740–59.
51.
KleineRobert E., KleineSusan Schultz, and KernanJerome B. (1993), “Mundane Consumption and the Self: A Social-Identity Perspective,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2 (3), 209–235.
52.
KoffkaKurt (1962), Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London: Lund Humpheries.
53.
LandwehrJan R., WentzelDaniel, and HerrmannAndreas (2012), “The Tipping Point of Design: How Product Design and Brands Interact to Affect Consumers' Preferences,”Psychology and Marketing, 29 (6), 422–33.
54.
LandwehrJan R., WentzelDaniel, and HerrmannAndreas (2013), “Product Design for the Long Run: Consumer Responses to Typical and Atypical Designs at Different Stages of Exposure,”Journal of Marketing, 77 (September), 92–107.
55.
LederHelmut, BelkeBenno, OeberstAndries, and AugustinDorothee (2004), “A Model of Aesthetic Appreciation and Aesthetic Judgments,”British Journal of Psychology (95), 489–508.
56.
LovettMitchell J., PeresRenana, and ShacharRon (2013), “On Brands and Word of Mouth,”Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (November), 427–44.
57.
LuchsMichael and SwanK.S. (2011), “Perspective: The Emergence of Product Design as a Field of Marketing Inquiry,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (3), 327–45.
58.
MacInnisDeborah J. and ParkC.W. (1991), “The Differential Role of Characteristics of Music on High- and Low-Involvement Consumers' Processing of Ads,”Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (2), 161–73.
59.
MalhotraNaresh K., MukhopadhyaySoumya, LiuXiaoyan, and DashSatyabhusan (2012), “One, Few or Many? An Integrated Framework for Identifying the Items in Measurement Scales,”International Journal of Market Research, 54 (6), 835–62.
60.
Marketing Science Institute (2010), 2010–2012 Research Priorities. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
61.
Marketing Science Institute (2012), 2012–2014 Research Priorities. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
62.
McCrackenGrant (1986), “Culture and Consumption: A Theoretical Account of the Structure and Movement of the Cultural Meaning of Consumer Goods,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (1), 71–84.
63.
MillerKlaus M., HofstetterReto, KrohmerHarley, and ZhangZ.J. (2011), “How Should Consumers' Willingness to Pay Be Measured? An Empirical Comparison of State-of-the-Art Approaches,”Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (February), 172–84.
64.
MuellerCharles W.,(2004), “Conceptualization, Operationalization, and Measurement,” in The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, Lewis-BeckMichael S., BrymanAlan, and LiaoTim F., eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 162–66.
65.
MuggeRuth and DahlDarren W. (2013), “Seeking the Ideal Level of Design Newness: Consumer Response to Radical and Incremental Product Design,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30 (S1), 34–47.
66.
NobleCharles H. and KumarMinu (2010), “Exploring the Appeal of Product Design: A Grounded, Value-Based Model of Key Design Elements and Relationships,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27 (5), 640–57.
67.
OkadaErica M.,(2005), “Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (February), 43–53.
68.
OrthUlrich R. and MalkewitzKeven (2008), “Holistic Package Design and Consumer Brand Impressions,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (May), 64–81.
69.
ParkC. Whan, MacInnisDeborah J., PriesterJoseph, EisingerichAndreas B., and IacobucciDawn (2010), “Brand Attachment and Brand Attitude Strength: Conceptual and Empirical Differentiation of Two Critical Brand Equity Drivers,”Journal of Marketing, 74 (November), 1–17.
70.
PeckJoann and ChildersTerry L. (2003), “Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: The ‘Need for Touch' Scale,”Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (3), 430–42.
71.
PetersThomas J.,(2005), Design: Tom Peters Essentials. London: Dorling Kindersley.
72.
PreacherKristopher J. and HayesAndrew F. (2008), “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models,”Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879–91.
73.
RadfordScott K. and BlochPeter H. (2011), “Linking Innovation to Design: Consumer Responses to Visual Product Newness,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (S1), 208–220.
74.
RaghubirPriya and GreenleafEric A. (2006), “Ratios in Proportion: What Should the Shape of the Package Be?”Journal of Marketing, 70 (April), 95–107.
75.
RamaniGirish and KumarV. (2008), “Interaction Orientation and Firm Performance,”Journal of Marketing, 72 (January), 27–45.
76.
ReberRolf, SchwarzNorbert, and WinkielmanPiotr (2004), “Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience?”Personality & Social Psychology Review, 8 (4), 364–82.
77.
ReimannMartin, ZaichkowskyJudith, NeuhausCarolin, BenderThomas, and WeberBernd (2010), “Aesthetic Package Design: A Behavioral, Neural, and Psychological Investigation,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20 (4), 431–41.
78.
RichardsonPaul S., DickAlan S., and JainArun K. (1994), “Extrinsic and Intrinsic Cue Effects on Perceptions of Store Brand Quality,”Journal of Marketing, 58 (October), 28–36.
79.
RindovaViolina P. and PetkovaAntoaneta P. (2007), “When Is a New Thing a Good Thing? Technological Change, Product Form Design, and Perceptions of Value for Product Innovations,”Organization Science, 18 (2), 217–32.
80.
RossiterJohn R.,(2002), “The C-OAR-SE Procedure for Scale Development in Marketing,”International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19 (4), 305–335.
81.
SchmittBernd (2012), “The Consumer Psychology of Brands,”Brand Insights from Psychological and Neurophysiological Perspectives, 22 (1), 7–17.
82.
SchmittBernd and SimonsonAlex (2009), Marketing Aesthetics. New York: The Free Press.
83.
SirgyM. Joseph (1982), “Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review,”Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (3), 287–300.
84.
SpearsNancy and YazdanparastAtefeh (2014), “Revealing Obstacles to the Consumer Imagination,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (3), 363–72.
85.
SprottDavid, CzellarSandor, and SpangenbergEric (2009), “The Importance of a General Measure of Brand Engagement on Market Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (February), 92–104.
86.
SrinivasanRaji, LilienGary L., RangaswamyArvind, PingitoreGina M., and SeldinDaniel (2012), “The Total Product Design Concept and an Application to the Auto Market,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (S1), 3–20.
87.
StompffGuido (2003), “The Forgotten Bond: Brand Identity and Product Design,”Design Management Journal, 14 (1), 26–32.
88.
StraussAnselm L. and CorbinJuliet M. (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
89.
TianKelly T., BeardenWilliam O., and HunterGary L. (2001), “Consumers' Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (1), 50–66.
90.
VergantiRoberto (2008), “Design, Meanings, and Radical Innovation: A Metamodel and a Research Agenda,”Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25 (5), 436–56.
91.
VeryzerRobert W.,(1995), “The Place of Product Design and Aesthetics in Consumer Research,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 22, KardesFrank R. and SujanMita, eds. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 641–45.
92.
VossKevin E., SpangenbergEric R., and GrohmannBianca (2003), “Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude,”Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (August), 310–20.
93.
WanousJohn P., ReichersArnon E., and HudyMichael J. (1997), “Overall Job Satisfaction: How Good Are Single-Item Measures?”Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (2), 247–52.
94.
WertheimerMax (1938), “über Gestalttheorie,” in A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, EllisWillis D., ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
95.
YeungCatherine W. and WyerRobert S. (2005), “Does Loving a Brand Mean Loving Its Products? The Role of Brand-Elicited Affect in Brand Extension Evaluations,”Journal of Marketing Research, 42 (November), 495–506.
96.
ZhangJie, WedelMichel, and PietersRik (2009), “Sales Effects of Attention to Feature Advertisements: A Bayesian Mediation Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (October), 669–81.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
