Background. It was identified that there is a lack of evidence for the effectiveness of formal mentorship programs, no evidence supporting mentor groups and little research in mentorship specific to occupational therapy. Purpose. The following quantitative study evaluates the mentorship program offered within the occupational therapy curriculum at The University of Western Ontario. Methods. One hundred and seventy nine surveys were analyzed to evaluate participants' perceptions of the program's strengths, weaknesses, changes needed, effectiveness, and whether it should continue to be offered. Results. In general, mentors and mentees reported that the mentorship program should continue to be offered and that it was effective in developing professionalism. However, the structure of the program, clarification of its requirements, and more support for the mentors were identified as some areas for change. Implications. Results can impact further program development at this university and other occupational therapy programs which may have a similar program or are interested in developing a mentorship program.
AnforthP. (1992). Mentors, not assessors. Nurse Education Today, 12, 299–302.
2.
BossersA., KernaghanJ., HodginsL., MerlaL., O'ConnorC., & Van KesselM. (1999). Defining and developing professionalism. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66, 116–121.
3.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
DombeckM.T. (1999). The mentor relationship [Editorial]. Research in Nursing and Health, 22, 1–2.
5.
JowersL.T., & HerrK. (1990). A review of literature on mentorprotégé relationships. NLN Publications, 15-2339, 49–77.
6.
LloydS., HewlinH., HornS., SutherlandM., MuellerG., & WittockJ.Our journey: Reflections on a mentor group in a new occupational therapy curriculum. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7.
MandichA., MilllerL., & LawM. (2002). Outcomes in evidence-based practice. In LawM. (Ed.), Evidence-based rehabilitation: A guide to practice (pp. 49–69). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
8.
MilnerT., & BossersA. (2004). Evaluation of the mentor-mentee relationship in an occupational therapy mentorship programme. Occupational Therapy International. 11 (2), 96–111.
9.
NolinskeT. (1995). Multiple mentoring relationships facilitate learning during fieldwork. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 39–43.
10.
OwensB.H., HerrickC.A., & KelleyJ.A. (1998). A prearranged mentorship program: Can it work long distance?Journal of Professional Nursing, 14 (2), 78–84.
11.
RaginsB.R., & CottonJ.L. (1999). Mentor functions and outcomes: A comparison of men and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (4), 529–550.
12.
RogersJ.C. (1986). Nationally Speaking — Mentoring for career achievement and advancement. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 79–82.
13.
SchemmR.L., & BrossT. (1994). Mentorship experiences in a group of occupational therapy leaders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49, 32–37.
TaylorL.J. (1992). A survey of mentor relationships in academe. Journal of Professional Nursing, 8 (1), 48–55.
16.
VanceC.N., & OlsonR.K. (1998). The mentor connection in nursing. New York: Springer Publishing.
17.
WoodrowP. (1994). Mentorship: Perceptions and pitfalls for nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 812–818.
18.
YatesP., CunninghamJ., MoyleW., & WollinJ. (1997). Peer mentorship in clinical education: Outcomes of a pilot programme for first year students. Nurse Education Today, 17 (5), 508–514.
