Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Two studies are reported that explore the feasibility of computer assisted composition in helping school-age children handle high-level aspects of the composing process. The first study used a program featuring help in selecting structural elements to include in opinion essays. The twelve grade six students, serving as subjects in the study, reported that the program was helpful, but a qualitative analysis of their products suggests the intervention was too easily assimilated to a low-level “What next?” composing strategy. In an attempt to strengthen the intervention, the second study introduced a response-sensitive questioning procedure. Qualitative measures suggest the thirty-six grade eight students found this on-line intervention to be too intrusive. The two approaches to on-line facilitation are discussed, and lines for the future investigation of computer assisted composition for the novice composer are suggested.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Frase

L. T.

, Writer's Workbench: Computer Supports for Components of the Writing Process, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, 1980.

MacDonald

N. H.

, Pattern Matching and Language Analysis as Editing Supports, papers presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, 1980.

Bereiter

and Scardamalia

, From Conversation to Composition: The Role of Instruction in A Developmental Process

R. Glaser

(ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology, Vol. 2, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1981.

Scardamalia

and Bereiter

, Fostering the Development of Self-Regulation in Children's Knowledge Processing, Chipman

S. S.

Segal

J. W.

and Glaser

(eds.), Thinking and Learning Skills: Current Research and Open Questions (Vol. 2), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, in press.

Bereiter

and Scardamalia

, Cognitive Coping Strategies and the Problem of “Inert Knowledge”, Chipman

S. S.

Segal

J. W.

and Glaser

(eds.), Thinking and Learning Skills: Current Research and Open Questions (Vol. 2), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, in press.

Scardamalia

and Bracewell

R. J.

, Local Planning in Children's Writing, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 1979.

Scardamalia

Bereiter

and Goelman

, The Role of Production Factors in Writing Ability, Nystrand

(ed.), What Writers Know: The Language and Structure of Written Discourse, Academic Press, New York, in press.

Bereiter

Scardamalia

Anderson

, and Smart

, An Experiment in Teaching Abstract Planning in Writing, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, 1980.

Anderson

Bereiter

and Smart

, Activation of Semantic Networks in Writing: Teaching Students How to Do it Themselves, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Boston, 1980.

10.

Matsuhashi

and Cooper

, A Video Time-Monitored Observational Study: The Transcribing Behavior and Composing Processes of a Competent High School Writer, State University of New York at Buffalo, New York, 1978 (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 155 701).

11.

Fillion

, Language Across the Curriculum: Examining the Place of Language in our Schools, McGill Journal of Education, XIV, pp. 47–60, Winter 1979.

12.

Bracewell

R. J.

Scardamalia

and Bereiter

The Development of Audience Awareness in Writing, Resources in Education, October 1978 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 154 433).

13.

Graves

D. H.

, Balance the Basics: Let Them Write, Ford Foundation, New York, 1978.

On the Road to Computer Assisted Compositions

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References