A robust legal and ethical framework for biomedical research has developed with regard to living subjects. This framework applies incompletely to research on autopsies, particularly medicolegal autopsies authorized by law rather than the consent of the next-of-kin. Many patient rights extinguish at death. No traditional physician-patient relationship exists with regard to the pathologist and an autopsied body. U.S. federal biomedical research regulation, the “Common Rule”, is specifically limited to living human subjects. Nonetheless, it may be wise to obtain consent of the next-of-kin for research involving tissues, invasive procedures, and family interviews, unless an Institutional Review Board waives the requirement due to “minimal risk” of harm. Similarly, privacy laws and regulations may not apply fully, but maintenance of confidentiality and anonymization of data may be prudent. Compliance with other research concerns, such as avoidance of conflicts of interest, “good laboratory practice”, and adherence to ethical norms are important. We recommend legislation to clarify and facilitate research in forensic pathology.
ElgerB.S., HofnerM.C., ManginP.. Research involving biological material from forensic autopsies: legal and ethical issues.Pathobiology.2009; 76(1): 1–10.
2.
RobertsL.W., NolteK.B., WarnerT.D.. Perceptions of the ethical acceptability of using medical examiner autopsies for research and education: a survey of forensic pathologists.Arch Pathol Lab Med.2000 Oct; 124(10): 1485–95.
3.
NolteK.B.. Research issues in forensic pathology: a survey of academic institutions employing forensic pathologists.Hum Pathol.2004 May; 35(5): 532–5.
4.
TobeyJ.A.. Public health and the police power.NY University Law Rev.1927; 4: 126–33.
5.
State Medical Examiner Act; Intrusiveness of autopsy or dissection, NJ Stat. Annotated § 52: 17B-88.6. L.1983, c. 535, s.6.
6.
State Medical Examiner Act; Standardized protocols for autopsies of suspected SIDS victims, NJ Stat. Annotated § 52: 17B-88.10 (d). L.2000, c.24; amended 2005, c.227, s.1; 2006, c.47, s.191.
Ann. Code of Maryland, Health General, Title 5 Death, Subtitle 4 State Anatomy Board, §5-401. Definitions (a) Medical study program; §5-407 Distribution and use of bodies or body parts; 1947, last amended 2010.
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), Pub. L. 101 (1990), 25 U.S.C. 3001 (1990); implemented at 43 C.F.R. 10.
11.
NSF: Where discoveries begin [Internet].Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; c2011. Definitions of research and development: an annotated compilation of official sources; [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 3 screens]. Available from: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/randdef/fedgov.cfm
12.
HHS: code of federal regulations [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; c2009. Title 45, public welfare, part 46, Protection of Human Subjects, 46.102 (d), definitions; 2010 Jan 15 [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html#46.102
13.
Sherley v Sebelius, DC CCA no. 10-5287, 2011 WL 1599685 (D.C. Cir. Ct. App., Apr 29, 2011); Sherley v Sebelius, USDC DC civ. No. 1: 09-cv-1575 (RCL) (D.C. Dist. Ct., Jul 27, 2011).
14.
FDA: CFR - code of federal regulations [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services; c2008. Title 21, Investigational New Drug Application, part 312, subpart A, general provisions, 312.3(b), definitions and interpretations. 2011 Apr 01 [cited 2011 Oct 14]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=312.3
15.
FDA: CFR - code of federal regulations [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services; c2011. Title 21, Investigational Device Exemptions, part 812, subpart A, general provisions, 812.3(h), definitions. 2011 Apr 01 [cited 2011 Oct 14]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=812&showFR=1
16.
NwabuezeR.N.. Biotechnology and the challenge of property: property rights in dead bodies, body parts, and genetic information.Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company; c2007. Chapter 2, Biotechnology and the property jurisprudence on the human body and parts; p. 44-46, 56–66.
17.
Moore v Regents of the University of California, 51 Cal. 3d 120; 271 Cal. Rptr. 146; 793 P.2d 479 (Cal 1990).
18.
Greenberg v Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute, 264 F. Supp, 2d 1064 (S.D. Fla 2003).
19.
Washington University v Catalona, 400 F.3d 667 (8th Cir. 2007);
20.
CatalonaW.J.. Ownership and use of tissue specimens for research, and response by Hakimian R, Korn D.JAMA.2005 Mar 16; 293(11): 1325; author reply 1325-6
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), Office for Protection from Research Risks (OPRR), exculpatory language in informed consent; 1996 Nov 15 [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/exculp.html
23.
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), Announcements for 2011, OHRP and FDA announce the availability of a joint draft guidance document on exculpatory language for public comment and review; 2011 Sep 7 [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 2 screens]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/newsroom/announcements/2011.html
NAME Position Statement on the Collection, Retention, and Disposition of Biologic Specimens by Medicolegal Investigative Agencies, adopted 11/18/2008, available through the NAME Executive Secretary.http://www.thename.org
30.
HallD.. Reflecting on Redfern: What can we learn from the Alder Hey story?Arch Dis Child.2001; 84(6): 455–6.
BBC News [Internet].London, UK: British Broadcasting Corporation; c2011. Q&A: Human Tissue Act. 2006 Aug 30 [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 2 screens]. Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4944018.stm
33.
AngellE.L., TarrantC., Dixon-WoodsM.. Research involving storage and use of human tissue: How did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?J Clin Pathol.2009 Sep; 62(9): 825–9.
34.
NCH: comprehensive cancer information [Internet].Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; c2011 Office of Biorepositiories and Biospecimen Research, NCI best practices; [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/practices/
35.
SobelM., HansenK.. Institutional Review Board: management and function.2nd ed.Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; c2006. Chapter 10-10, Banking of human biological materials for research; p. 433–437.
36.
Moore v Regents of the University of California, 51 Cal. 3d 120; 271 Cal. Rptr. 146; 793 P2d 479
37.
Association for Molecular Pathology v U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Fed. Cir. No. 2010-1406, Jul 29, 2011.
38.
Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law no. 10.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; c1949 Volume 2; p. 181–2.
39.
OHSR: Office of Human Subjects Research [Internet].National Institutes of Health; c2011. Nuremberg code; [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html
40.
World Medical Association [Internet].Ferney-Voltaire, France: World Medical Association; c2011. WMA declaration of Helsinki - ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects; 2008 Oct [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 4 screens]. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html
41.
Kefauver-Harris Amendment, Public Law 87-781 (1987), 76 Stat. 788-89 (1987);
42.
FDA Regulations at Protection of Human Subjects, 21 C.F.R. 130.3, later incorporated in 45 C.F.R. 46.
43.
HSS: Office of Health, Safety and Security [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy; c2011. ACHRE Report, Chapter 3, The Development of Human Subject Research Policy at DHEW; [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 4 screens]. Available from: http://www.hss.energy.gov/HealthSafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/chap3_2.html
44.
U.S. Surgeon General, Public Health Service to the Heads of the Institutions Conducting Research with Public Health Service Grants, 8 February 1966 (“Clinical research and investigation involving human beings”) (ACHRE No. HHS-090794-A). Distributed through Bureau of Medical Services Circular no. 38, 1966 Jun 23.
45.
National Research Act, Title II, Public Law 93-348, 1974; implemented at Protection of Human Research Subjects, 45 C.F.R. 46 (1974).
46.
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. The Belmont Report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research, The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research; 1979 April 18 [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 5 screens]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html
47.
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects ('Common Rule'); [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/commonrule/index.html
48.
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. ANPRM for revision to common rule: information related to advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) for revisions to the common rule; [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/anprm2011page.html
49.
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. Federal Register, Volume 76, Number 170; 2011 Sep 1 [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-09-01/html/2011-22341.htm
Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital (211 NY 125, 105 NE 92, NY Ct of App, 1914).
53.
Salgo v Stanford (Civ. No. 1st Dist., Div One, 1957).
54.
Natanson v Kline (350 P2d 1093, 186 Kansas 393, 1960).
55.
Canterbury v Spence (464 F 2d 772, DC Cir, 1972).
56.
Cobb v Grant (502 P2d 1, 8 Cal 3d 229, 104 Cal Rptr, 1972).
57.
BergJ.W., AppelbaumP.S., ParkerL.S., LidzC.W.. Informed consent: legal theory and clinical practice.2nd ed.New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001.
58.
FadenR.R., BeauchampT.L., KingN.M.P.. A history and theory of informed consent.New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1986.
59.
MansonN.C., O'NeillO.O.. Rethinking informed consent in bioethics.Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
60.
ClaytonE.W., SteinbergK.K., KhouryM.J.. Informed consent for genetic research on stored tissue samples.JAMA.1995 Dec 13; 274(22): 1786–92.
61.
BeskowL.M., BurkeW., MerzJ.F.. Informed consent for population-pased research involving genetics.JAMA.2001 Nov 14; 286(18): 2315–21.
62.
KantJ.A., SobelM.E.. Genetic research using archival samples: an uncertain future?Mol Diagn.1996 Jun; 1(2): 79–82.
63.
GrodyWW, SobelM.E.. Update on informed consent for stored tissue research.Diagnostic Molecular Pathol.1996 Jun; 5(2): 79–80.
64.
GrizzleW., GrodyW.W., NollW.W.. Recommended policies for uses of human tissue in research, education, and quality control. Ad Hoc Committee on Stored Tissue, College of American Pathologists.Arch Pathol Lab Med.1999 Apr; 123(4): 296–300.
65.
HakimianR., KornD.. Ownership and use of tissue specimens for research.JAMA.2004 Nov 24; 292(20): 2500–5.
66.
AamodtR.L., HakimianR., BledsoeM.. Human Specimen Research: Regulation, Policy, and Ethical Issues.Am Assoc Cancer Res Educ Book.Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research; 2005 [cited 2011 Sep 29]. p. 319–322. Available from: http://educationbook.aacrjournals.org/cgi/reprint/2005/1/319
67.
KappM.B.. Ethical and legal issues in research involving human subjects: Do you want a piece of me?J Clin Pathol.2006 Apr; 59(4): 335–9.
68.
VaughtJ.B., LockhartN., ThielK.S., SchneiderJ.A.. Ethical, legal, and policy issues: Dominating the biospecimen discussion (editorial).Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev.2007 Dec; 16(12): 2521–3.
69.
DryS.. Who owns diagnostic tissue blocks?Lab Med.2009 Feb; 40(2): 69–73.
70.
AllenM.J., PowersM.L.E., GronowskiK.S., GronowskiA.M.. Human tissue ownership and use in research: What laboratorians and researchers should know.Clin Chem.2010 Nov; 56(11): 1675–82.
71.
SklootR.. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks.New York, NY: Random House; c2010. p. 135.
72.
Institutional Review Board:management and function.2nd ed. ed. BankertE.A., AmdurR.J.. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2006.
73.
MazurD.J.. Evaluating the science and ethics of research on humans: a guide for IRB members.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007.
74.
OakesJ.M.. Risks and wrongs in social science research: an evaluator's guide to the IRB.Eval Rev.2002 Oct; 26(5): 443–79.
75.
MuellerJ.H.. Ignorance is neither bliss nor ethical.Northwest Univ Law Rev.2007; 101(2): 809–36.
76.
OHSR: Office of Human Subjects Research [Internet].National Institutes of Health; c2011. Title 45, part 46 Protection of Human Subjects, 46.102(i); 2005 Jun 23 [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 4 screens]. Available from: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/45cfr46.html#46.102
77.
WendlerD., BelskyL., ThompsonK.M., EmanuelE.J.. Quantifying the federal minimal risk standard: implications for pediatric research without a prospect of direct benefit.JAMA.2005 Aug 17; 294(7): 826–32.
78.
BarnbaumD.. Making more sense of “minimal risk”.IRB: Ethics & Human Research.2002 May-Jun; 24(3): 10–3.
GPO: U.S. Government Printing Office [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; c2011. Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) for Revisions to the Common Rule, federal register, 76(143); 2011 Jul 26 [cited 2011 Oct 14]. p. 44515, sec. 4v. Available from: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-07-26/pdf/2011-18792.pdf
81.
NLM: National Library of Medicine - National Institutes of Health [Internet].Bethesda, MD: U.S. National Library of Medicine; c1993. The Hippocratic Oath; 2010 Jun 24 [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/greek/greek_oath.html
82.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), Public Law 104-191, 1966: Administrative Data Standards and Related Requirements; Security and privacy, 45 C.F.R. 164.
83.
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. Health Information Privacy; [cited 2011 Sep 29]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/
84.
HHS: code of federal regulations [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; c2009. Title 45, public welfare, part 160, general administrative requirements; 45 C.F.R. 160.103, definitions; [cited 2011 Oct 14]. 5p. Available from: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2002/octqtr/pdf/45cfr160.103.pdf
CMS: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [Internet].Baltimore, MD: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2011. HIPAA general information, are you a covered entity?; [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/hipaageninfo/06_areyouacoveredentity.asp
87.
HHS: code of federal regulations [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; c2009. Title 45, public welfare, part 164, security and privacy; 45 C.F.R. 164.512(f), uses and disclosures for which an authorization or opportunity to agree or object is not required, standard: disclosures for law enforcement purposes; [cited 2011 Oct 14]; [about 4 screens]. Available from: http://cfr.vlex.com/vid/164-512-uses-disclosures-agree-object-19931884
88.
HHS: code of federal regulations [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; c2009. Title 45, public welfare, part 164, security and privacy; 45 C.F.R. 164.512(b), uses and disclosures for which an authorization or opportunity to agree or object is not required, standard: Uses and disclosures for public health activities; [cited 2011 Oct 14]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://cfr.vlex.com/vid/164-512-uses-disclosures-agree-object-19931884
89.
HHS: code of federal regulations [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; c2009. Title 45, public welfare, part 164, security and privacy; 45 C.F.R. 164.512(a), uses and disclosures for which an authorization or opportunity to agree or object is not required, standard: Uses and disclosures required by law; [cited 2011 Oct 14]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://cfr.vlex.com/vid/164-512-uses-disclosures-agree-object-19931884
90.
HHS: code of federal regulations [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; c2009. Title 45, public welfare, part 164, security and privacy; 45 C.F.R. 164.512(g), uses and disclosures for which an authorization or opportunity to agree or object is not required, standard: Uses and disclosures about decedents; [cited 2011 Oct 14]; [about 5 screens]. Available from: http://cfr.vlex.com/vid/164-512-uses-disclosures-agree-object-19931884
91.
NIH: HIPAA privacy rule and its impact on research [Internet].Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; c2007. Research repositories, databases, and the HIPAA privacy rule; 2004 Jul 02 [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/research_repositories.asp
92.
NIH: HIPAA privacy rule and its impact on research [Internet].Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; c2007. Protecting personal health information in research: understanding the HIPAA privacy rule; [cited 2011 Sep 29]; 32p. Available from: http://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/pdf/HIPAA_Privacy_Rule_Booklet.pdf
93.
NassS.J., LevitL.A., GostinL.O., editors. Beyond the HIPAA privacy rule: enhancing privacy, improving health through research.Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2009. 334 p.
94.
HHS: code of federal regulations [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; c2009. Title 45, public welfare, part 164, security and privacy; 45 C.F.R. 164.512(i), uses and disclosures for which an authorization or opportunity to agree or object is not required, standard: Uses and disclosures for research purposes; [cited 2011 Oct 14]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://cfr.vlex.com/vid/164-512-uses-disclosures-agree-object-19931884
95.
HHS: code of federal regulations [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; c2009. Title 45, public welfare, part 164, security and privacy; 45 C.F.R. 164.514, Privacy of individually identifiable health information, standard: Other requirements relating to Uses and disclosures of protected health information; [cited 2011 Oct 14]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://cfr.vlex.com/vid/164-514-uses-disclosures-protected-19931886
96.
NIH: HIPAA privacy rule and its impact on research [Internet].Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; c2007. How can covered entities use and disclose protected health information for research and comply with the privacy rule?; 2007 Feb 02 [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/pr_08.asp
97.
HHS: code of federal regulations [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; c2009. Title 45, public welfare, part 164, security and privacy; 45 C.F.R. 164.514(e), Privacy of individually identifiable health information, standard: Limited data set; [cited 2011 Oct 14]; [about 3 screens]. Available from: http://cfr.vlex.com/vid/164-514-uses-disclosures-protected-19931886
98.
Federal Register [Internet].Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration; c2011. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), Public Law 110-233, 2008; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; Genetic Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, 29 C.F.R. 1635; 2010 Nov 09 [cited 2011 Oct 14] Available from: http://federalregister.gov/a/2010-28011
99.
The Florida Senate [Internet].Tallahassee, FL: State of Florida; c2000-2011. Florida statutes: medical examiners; disposition of dead bodies, Fla Stat 406,135: Autopsies; confidentiality of photographs and video and audio rececordings; exemption, [Earnhardt Family Protection Act]; [cited 2011 Oct 14]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2011/406.135
100.
CantorN.L.. After we die: the life and times of the human cadaver.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; c2010. p. 43–44, 60-71.
101.
GPO: U.S. Government Printing Office [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; c2011. Title 35, patents, part II, patentability of inventions and grant of patents, chapter 18: patent rights in inventions made with federal assistance [Bayh-Dole Act, 1980], 35 U.S.C. Sec. 200-212; [cited 2011 Oct 14], [about 2 screens]. Available from: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/usc.cgi?ACTION=BROWSE&TITLE=35USCPII&PDFS=YES
102.
GPO: U.S. Government Printing Office [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; c2011. Title 37: patents, trademarks, and copyrights; part 401, rights to inventions made by nonprofit organizations and small business firms under government grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements, 37 C.F.R. 401; [cited 2011 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_02/37cfr401_02.html
103.
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. Office of Research Integrity, RCR resources, Conflicts of Interest and Commitment; 2011 May 26 [cited 2011 Sep 29]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/rcr_conflict.shtml
104.
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. Office of Research Integrity, Handling Misconduct, 42 C.F.R. 50 subpart A; 2009 Dec 6 [cited 2011 Oct 14]; [about 1 screen]. Available from: http://ori.hhs.gov/misconduct/reg_subpart_a.shtml
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP); [cited 2011 Sep 29]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/
109.
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. Office of Research Integrity; 2011 Sep 7 [cited 2011 Sep 29]. Available from: http://ori.hhs.gov/
110.
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. Office of Research Integrity, RCR tab; 2011 Sep 7 [cited 2011 Sep 29]. Available from: http://ori.hhs.gov/
111.
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. Office of Research Integrity, ORI introduction to RCR; 2011 Sep 7 [cited 2011 Sep 29]. Available from: http://ori.hhs.gov/publications/ori_intro_text.shtml
112.
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. Office of Research Integrity, Misconduct tab; 2011 Sep 7 [cited 2011 Sep 29]. Available from: http://ori.hhs.gov/
113.
GPO: U.S. Government Printing Office [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; c2011. Title 42, public health, part 93, Public Health Service policies on research misconduct, 42 C.F.R. 93; [cited 2011 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_07/42cfr93_07.html
114.
HHS: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services [Internet].Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services; c2009. The Office of Research Integrity Annual Report 2009; [cited 2011 Sep 29]. Available from: http://ori.hhs.gov/
115.
ParrishD.. Scientific misconduct and the plagiarism cases.J College and University Law.1995; 21(3): 517–54.
116.
LSU PualM.. Hebert Law Center [Internet]. Walter C, Richards EP. Defining scientific misconduct for the benefit of science; [cited 2011 Sep 29]. Available from: http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/ieee/ieee23.htm#fn2
117.
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academies of Science, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine.On being a scientist: a guide to responsible conduct in research.3rd Ed.Washington DC: National Academies of Science Press; 2009.
118.
MacrinaF.L.. Scientific integrity: text and cases in responsible conduct of research.3rd ed.Washington DC: ASM Press; 2005.
119.
ShamooE.A., ResnikE.A.. Responsible Conduct of Research.2d ed.New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2009.
120.
GallinJ.I., OgnibeneF.P.. Principles and Practices of Clinical Research.London, UK: Academic Press; 2002.
