This study explored the effect of utilizing natural supports strategies on the cost of supported employment in the state of Wisconsin. Data presented here suggest that the use of natural supports reduced annual per capita costs by 57.6%. Further, supported employees trained via natural supports generated cumulative costs of $5,063 over 6.04 fiscal quarters (i.e., $838 per fiscal quarter). This is compared to the state average of $8,212 over 3.36 fiscal quarters (i.e., $2,444 per fiscal quarter).
BraddockD.RizzoloM. C.HempR. (2004). The state of the states in developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation, 42, 317–320.
2.
ButterworthJ.HagnerD.KiernanW.SchalockR. (1996). Natural supports in the workplace and community: Defining an agenda for research and practice. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 21, 103–113.
3.
CimeraR. E. (2000a). The cost-efficiency of supported employment programs: A literature review. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 14, 51–61.
4.
CimeraR. E. (2000b). Improving the cost efficiency of supported employment programs. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 11, 145–151.
5.
CimeraR. E. (2001). Utilizing coworkers as “natural supports”: Evidence on cost-efficiency, job retention, and other employment outcomes. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 11, 194–201.
6.
CimeraR. E. (2006). The future of supported employment: Don't panic!Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 24, 145–150.
7.
CimeraR. E. (2007). The costs of supported employment in Wisconsin: FY 2002 to 2005. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 25, 1–8.
8.
CimeraR. E.RuschF. R. (1999). The cost-efficiency of supported employment programs: A review of the literature. In. GliddenL. M. (Ed.), International review of research of mental retardation (pp. 175–226). San Diego, Academic Press.
9.
DiLeoD.LueckingR.HathawayS. (1995). Natural supports in action: Strategies to facilitate employer supports of workers with disabilities. St. Augustine, FL: TRN.
10.
FabianE.LueckingR. (1991). Doing it the company way: Using internal company supports in the workplace. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 22, 32–35.
11.
Hanley-MaxwellC.MillingtonM. (1992). Enhancing independence in supported employment: Natural supports in business and industry. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 2, 51–58.
12.
HillM. L.WehmanP. H.KregelJ.BankP. D.MetzlerH. M. D. (1987). Employment outcomes for people with moderate and severe disabilities: An eight-year longitudinal analysis of supported competitive employment. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 12, 182–189.
LevinH. M.McEwanP. J. (2000). Cost-effectiveness analysis: Methods and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
15.
LewisD.JohnsonD. R.BruininksR. H.KallsenL. A.GuilleryR. P. (1992). Is supported employment cost-effective in Minnesota?Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 3, 67–92.
16.
MankD. (1994). The underachievement of supported employment: A call for reinvestment. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 5, 1–24.
17.
MankD. (1996). Natural support in the employment for people with disabilities: What do we know and when did we know it?Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 21, 174–177.
18.
McCaughrinW. B.EllisW. K.RuschF. R.HealL. W. (1993). Cost-effectiveness of supported employment. Mental Retardation, 31, 41–48.
19.
NisbetJ.HagnerD. (1988). Natural supports in the workplace: A reexamination of supported employment. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 260–267.
20.
ParentW.WehmanP.BricoutJ. (2001). Supported employment and natural supports. In WehmanP. (Ed.), Supported employment in business: Expanding the capacity of workers with disabilities (pp. 93–114). Augustine, FL: Transition Resources Network.
21.
PumpianI.FischerD. (1993, May). Job placement: The final frontier?NIDRR, 29–45.
22.
RoganP.HagnerD.MurphyS. (1993). Natural supports: Reconceptualizing job coach roles. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 18, 275–281.
23.
RuschF. R.BraddockD. (2004). Adult day programs versus supported employment (1988–2002): Spending and service practices of mental retardation and developmental disabilities state agencies. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 29, 237–242.
24.
RuschF. R.ConleyR. W.McCaughrinW. B. (1993). Benefit–cost analysis of supported employment in Illinois. Journal of Rehabilitation, 59, 31–36.
25.
RuschF. R.HughesC. (1996). Natural supports: Who benefits—“We” or “they”?Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 21, 185–188.
26.
SchneiderK.RuschF. R.HendersonR.GeskeT. (1981). Competitive employment for mentally retarded persons: Costs vs. benefits. In HalloranW. (Ed.), Funding and cost analysis (pp. 1–13). Urbana: Leadership Training Institute, University of Illinois.
27.
TestD. W.WoodW. M. (1996). Natural supports in the workplace: The jury is still out. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 21, 155–173.
28.
TrachJ. S.SheldenD. M. (1999). Natural supports: A foundation for employment. Annapolis Junction, MD: American Association on Mental Retardation.
29.
WehmanP.HillM.HillJ.BrookeV.PendletonP.BrittC. (1985). Competitive employment for persons with mental retardation: A follow-up six years later. Mental Retardation, 23, 274–281.
30.
WehmanP.KregelJ. (1995). At the crossroads: Supported employment a decade later. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 286–299.
31.
ZivolichS.SuemanS. A.WeinerJ. S. (1997). An exploratory cost–benefit analysis of natural support strategies in the employment of people with severe disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 8, 211–221.
