Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-6
The Tension between Money and Culture: Inequality,Economic Capital,Cultural Capital,and High School Students’ Educational Achievements from a Comparative Perspective
This study investigated how income inequality shapes the role of economic and cultural capital in students’ academic performance. By analyzing a multilevel dataset of 72 countries (economies), we found that (1) the associations between economic capital and academic achievements are stronger in unequal societies than in equal ones, whereas the associations between cultural capital and students’ achievements are stronger in equal societies than in unequal ones, and (2) in more equal societies, the associations between cultural capital and students’ achievements are stronger for students with lower economic capital, whereas the associations between cultural capital and students’ achievements are stronger for students with higher stocks of economic capital in unequal societies. The findings contribute to understanding how social context shapes the processes of intergenerational reproduction from a comparative perspective.
AndersenI. G.JægerM. M. (2015). Cultural capital in context: Heterogeneous returns to cultural capital across schooling environments. Social Science Research, 50, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.11.015
AxinnW.DuncanG. J.ThorntonA. (1997). The effects of parents’ income, wealth, and attitudes on children's completed schooling and self-esteem. In DuncanG. J.Brooks-GunnJ. (Eds.), Consequences of growing up poor (pp. 518–540). Sage.
4.
BakerD. P.AkibaM.LeTendreG. K.WisemanA. W. (2001). Worldwide shadow education: Outside-school learning, institutional quality of schooling, and cross-national mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023001001
5.
BelleyP.LochnerL. (2007). The changing role of family income and ability in determining educational achievement. Journal of Human Capital, 1(1), 37–89. https://doi.org/10.1086/524674
6.
BennettP. R.LutzA. C.JayaramL. (2012). Beyond the schoolyard: The role of parenting logics, financial resources, and social institutions in the social class gap in structured activity participation. Sociology of Education, 85(2), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040711431585
7.
BjörklundA.JänttiM. (1997). Intergenerational income mobility in Sweden compared to the United States. American Economic Review, 87(5), 1009–1018. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2951338
8.
BourdieuP. (1987). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press.
9.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonG. J. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research in the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
10.
BourdieuP. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In KarabelJ. (Ed.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–510). Oxford University Press.
11.
BourdieuP.BoltanskiL. (1978). Changes in social structure and changes in the demand for education. In GinerS.ArcherM. S. (Eds.), Contemporary Europe: Social structures and cultural patterns (pp. 197–227). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
12.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (Vol. 4). Sage.
13.
BrayM. (2013). Shadow education: Comparative perspectives on the expansion and implications of private supplementary tutoring. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 77, 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.096
14.
BreinholtA.JægerM. M. (2020). How does cultural capital affect educational performance: Signals or skills?British Journal of Sociology, 71(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12711
15.
ByunS. Y.SchoferE.KimK. K. (2012). Revisiting the role of cultural capital in East Asian educational systems: The case of South Korea. Sociology of Education, 85(3), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040712447
16.
ChinT.PhillipsM. (2004). Social reproduction and child-rearing practices: Social class, children's agency, and the summer activity gap. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700301
17.
ColemanJ. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.
18.
ColemanJ. S.CampbellE. Q.HobsonC. J.McPartlandJ.MoodA. M.WeinfeldF. D.YorkR. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Government Printing Office.
19.
ConleyD. (2001). Capital for college: Parental assets and postsecondary schooling. Sociology of Education, 74, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673145
20.
CorakM. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.3.79
21.
CummingsW. K. (2014). Education and equality in Japan (Vol. 869). Princeton University Press.
22.
De GraafN. D.De GraafP. M.KraaykampG. (2000). Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in the Netherlands: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective. Sociology of Education, 73(2), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673239
23.
DiMaggioP. (1982). Cultural capital and school success: The impact of status culture participation on the grades of US high school students. American Sociological Review, 47, 189–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094962
24.
DoepkeM.ZilibottiF. (2019). Love, money, and parenting: How economics explains the way we raise our kids. Princeton University Press.
25.
DumaisS. A. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 44–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090253
FarkasG. (2017). Human capital or cultural capital? Ethnicity and poverty groups in an urban school district. Routledge.
28.
GamoranA.LongD. A. (2007). Equality of educational opportunity: A 40-year retrospective. Springer Netherlands.
29.
GoldbergerA. S. (1989). Economic and mechanical models of intergenerational transmission. American Economic Review, 79(3), 504–513. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1806859
30.
Goldrick-RabS.PfefferF. T. (2009). Beyond access: Explaining socioeconomic differences in college transfer. Sociology of Education, 82(2), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070908200201
31.
HackerJ. S.PiersonP. (2010). Winner-take-all politics: How Washington made the rich richer—and turned its back on the middle class. Simon & Schuster.
32.
HamermeshD. S.FrazisH.StewartJ. (2005). Data watch: The American time use survey. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330053148029
33.
Hampden-ThompsonG.GuzmanL.LippmanL. (2008). Cultural capital: What does it offer students? A cross-national analysis. Springer Netherlands.
34.
HavemanR.WilsonK. (2007). Access, matriculation, and graduation. In Dickert-ConlinS.RubenstienR. (Eds.), Economic inequality and higher education: Access, persistence, and success. Sage.
35.
HeynemanS. P.LoxleyW. A. (1983). The effect of primary-school quality on academic achievement across twenty-nine high-and low-income countries. American Journal of Sociology, 88(6), 1162–1194. https://doi.org/10.1086/227799
36.
JægerM. M. (2009). Equal access but unequal outcomes: Cultural capital and educational choice in a meritocratic society. Social Forces, 87(4), 1943–1971. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0192
37.
JægerM. M.HolmA. (2007). Does parents. economic, cultural, and social capital explain the social class effect on educational attainment in the Scandinavian mobility regime?Social Science Research, 36(2), 719–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.11.003
38.
JægerM. M.MøllegaardS. (2017). Cultural capital, teacher bias, and educational success: New evidence from monozygotic twins. Social Science Research, 65, 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.04.003
KatsillisJ.RubinsonR. (1990). Cultural capital, student achievement, and educational reproduction: The case of Greece. American Sociological Review, 55(2), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095632
LamontM.LareauA. (1988). Cultural capital: Allusions, gaps and glissandos in recent theoretical developments. Sociological Theory, 6(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.2307/202113
43.
LareauA. (2018). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. In GruskyD.HillJ. (Eds.), Inequality in the 21st century (pp. 443–450). Routledge.
44.
LareauA. (2003). Unequal childhoods. University of California Press.
45.
LareauA. (2002). Invisible inequality: Social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review, 67(5), 747–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240206700507
46.
LareauA. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112583
LarsonR. W.VermaS. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.701
49.
LayteR.WhelanC. T. (2014). Who feels inferior? A test of the status anxiety hypothesis of social inequalities in health. European Sociological Review, 30(4), 525–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu057
50.
LiY. (2006). Institutional change and educational inequality: Mechanisms in educational stratification in urban China (1966–2003). Social Science in China, 4, 97–109. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=upp0mjVwiKXNZd-yO NulJRVEGpkEIVPB-vjE8hwfO9QmxvGwSxnmQvnWe_aguvtGhFtwefxiner F0fGpx_S1t8kbO2_3fD4RdnkwQsAS5Nwjaf3DIYRu5_cckWdMZbaLhYqIkbvd5-JRq-mbMA9MCsXgIxZ697dUwzD0EaPxHGyWulRq6wQao0aCktbiDtUfcqCoJP2 sCsA=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
51.
LinK. H. (2015). The financial premium in the US labor market: A distributional analysis. Social Forces, 94(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sou132
52.
LovenheimM. F. (2011). The effect of liquid housing wealth on college enrollment. Journal of Labor Economics, 29(4), 741–771. https://doi.org/10.1086/660775
53.
MarteletoL.AndradeF. (2014). The educational achievement of Brazilian adolescents: Cultural capital and the interaction between families and schools. Sociology of Education, 87(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040713494223
54.
MorganS. L.KimY. M. (2006). Inequality of conditions and intergenerational mobility: Changing patterns of educational attainment in the United States. In MorganS. L.GruskyD. B.FieldsG. S. (Eds.), Mobility and inequality. Frontiers of research in sociology and economics (pp. 165–194). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503625495-009
55.
MonttG. (2011). Cross-national differences in educational achievement inequality. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040710392717
56.
MøllegaardS.JægerM. M. (2015). The effect of grandparents. economic, cultural, and social capital on grandchildren's educational success. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 42, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2015.06.004
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). PISA data analysis manual SPSS. OECD.
59.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 technical report. OECD.
60.
OrrA. J. (2003). Black–white differences in achievement: The importance of wealth. Sociology of Education, 76(4), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519867
61.
OrfieldG.EatonS. E. (1996). Dismantling desegregation. The quiet reversal of brown v. board of education. New Press.
62.
OwensA. (2016). Inequality in children's contexts: Income segregation of households with and without children. American Sociological Review, 81(3), 549–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416642430
63.
OwensA.ReardonS. F.JencksC. (2016). Income segregation between schools and school districts. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.3102/000283121665272
64.
PalardyG. J. (2013). High school socioeconomic segregation and student attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 714–754. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213481240
65.
PersellC. H.CooksonP. W.Jr. (1985). Chartering and bartering: Elite education and social reproduction. Social Problems, 33(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.2307/800556
66.
PikettyT. (2017). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.
67.
PowersM. G. (2021). Measures of socioeconomic status: Current issues. Routledge.
68.
PutnamR. D. (2016). Our kids: The American dream in crisis. Simon & Schuster.
69.
ReardonS. F.BischoffK. (2011). Income inequality and income segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 116(4), 1092–1153. https://doi.org/10.1086/657114
70.
RobinsonR. V.GarnierM. A. (1985). Class reproduction among men and women in France: Reproduction theory on its home ground. American Journal of Sociology, 91(2), 250–280. https://doi.org/10.1086/228277
71.
SchneiderD.HastingsO. P.LaBriolaJ. (2018). Income inequality and class divides in parental investments. American Sociological Review, 83(3), 475–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418772034
72.
SteinbergL. (2001). We know some things: Parent–adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.00001
73.
StevensonD. L.BakerD. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to university in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1639–1657. https://doi.org/10.1086/229942
74.
SwartzD. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. University of Chicago Press.
75.
Von HippelP. T. (2007). Regression with missing Ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37(1), 83–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2007.00180.x
76.
WangJ.WuY. (2023a). Income inequality, cultural capital, and high school students’ academic achievement in OECD countries: A moderated mediation analysis. British Journal of Sociology, 74(2), 148–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12997
77.
WangJ.WuY. (2023b). Private supplementary education and Chinese adolescents’ development: The moderating effects of family socioeconomic status. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(2), 745–767. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22774
78.
WatsonT. (2009). Inequality and the measurement of residential segregation by income in American neighborhoods. Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3), 820–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2009.00346.x
79.
WilkinsonR.PickettK. (2019). The inner level: How more equal societies reduce stress, restore sanity and improve everyone's well-being. Penguin.
80.
WilsonA.UrickA. (2021). Cultural reproduction theory and schooling: The relationship between student capital and opportunity to learn. American Journal of Education, 127(2), 193–232. https://doi.org/10.1086/712086
81.
WuY. (2008). Cultural capital, the state, and educational inequality in China, 1949–1996. Sociological Perspectives, 51(1), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2008.51.1.201
82.
WuY.HuangC.HuangS. (2017). The dual cultural reproduction of families and schools: A heterogeneous discussion about the effects of cultural capital. Journal of Social Development, 3(4), 1–27. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract? v=upp0mjVwiKV8dvSR1wxXynVrziJSZBGavnWRvgI8Qdv5qjzPQ_CaNGp3BvMI_uasYaz7hbK8QELAappsjwyxbT88Sb9shxYlak5JFWSizn1dDP2ElXVWmxl_D-1 CiXlW2OhL4u0BN6Fiait1Zz8GhdXpogPiHoircjuqiiLQ6vXMvm6l2Whx36Ix1F7-Hrh4HcEcXqma59E=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
83.
YamamotoY.BrintonM. C. (2010). Cultural capital in East Asian educational systems: The case of Japan. Sociology of Education, 83(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040709356567
ZhuB. (2018). Cultural reproduction or cultural mobility? A study on the inequality of college students. educational achievements in China. Sociological Studies, 1, 142–168. https://doi.org/10.19934/j.cnki.shxyj.2018.01.007
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
