Building on the work of Ball and Cohen and that of Davis and Krajcik, as well as more recent research related to teacher learning from and about curriculum materials, we seek to answer the question, How can prospective teachers (PTs) learn to read and use educative curriculum materials in ways that support them in acquiring the knowledge needed for teaching? We present two extended conceptual examples of ways in which educative curriculum materials might be used to support PTs in developing the knowledge needed for teaching. We follow these examples with a set of empirically based design principles and conclude with a brief consideration of unanswered questions related to the use of educative curriculum materials in teacher education.
BallD. L.CohenD. K. (1996). Reform by the book: what is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?Educational Researcher, 25(6), 8–14.
2.
BallD. L.ForzaniF. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 497–511.
3.
BallD. L.HillH. C.BassH. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide?American Educator, Fall2005, 14–22.
4.
BallD. L.ThamesM. H.PhelpsG. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.
5.
BeyerC.DavisE. A. (2009). Supporting preservice elementary teachers’ critique and adaptations of science lesson plans using educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 517–536.
6.
BeyerC.DavisE. A. (2012). Developing preservice elementary teachers’ pedagogical design capacity for reform-based curriculum design. Curriculum Inquiry, 42, 386–413.
CollopyR. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. Elementary School Journal, 103, 287–311.
9.
DavisE. A. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers’ critique of instructional materials for science. Science Education, 90, 348–375.
DrakeC.CirilloM.Herbel-EisenmannB. (2009). Contemporary curriculum issues: Using curriculum to build on children’s thinking. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16, 49–54.
12.
DrakeC.LandT. J. (2012, April). Elementary pre-service teachers noticing and learning from educative curriculum materials. Paper presented at the NCTM Research Pre-Session. Philadelphia, PA.
13.
DrakeC.SherinM. G. (2009). Developing curriculum vision and trust: Changes in teachers’ curriculum strategies. In RemillardJ.Herbel-EisenmannB.LloydG. (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 321–337). New York, NY: Routledge Education.
14.
EmpsonS. B.JunkD. L. (2004). Teachers’ knowledge of children’s mathematics after implementing a student-centered curriculum. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 121–144.
15.
ForbesC. T.DavisE. A. (2008). The development of preservice elementary teachers’ curricular role identity for science teaching. Science Education, 92, 909–940.
16.
ForbesC. T.DavisE. A. (2010). Curriculum design for inquiry: Preservice elementary teachers’ mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 820–839.
17.
GrossmanP.McDonaldM.HammernessK.RonfeldtM. (2008). Dismantling dichotomies in teacher education. In Cochran-SmithM.Feiman-NemserS.McIntyreD. J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
HiebertJ.MorrisA. K.BerkA.JansenA. (2007). Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 47–61.
19.
HillH. C.SleepL.LewisJ. M.BallD. L. (2007). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge. What knowledge matters and what evidence counts. In LesterF. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 111–155). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
20.
JacobsV. R.LambL. L. C.PhilippR. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 169–202.
21.
LandT. J.DrakeC. (in press). Understanding pre-service teachers’ curricular knowledge. In LoJ.LeathamK. R.Van ZoestL. R. (Eds.), Research trends in mathematics teacher education. New York, NY: Springer.
22.
LandT. J.TyminskiA. M.DrakeC. (2013). Examining pre-service teachers’ emerging abilities to read Standards-based curriculum materials. In SuperfineA. C.MartinezM.LarnellG.StoelingaT.MartinD. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 809-812). Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago.
23.
LloydG. M. (2008). Curriculum use while learning to teach: One student teacher’s appropriation of mathematics curriculum materials. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 63–94.
24.
LloydG. M. (2009). School mathematics curriculum materials for teachers’ learning: Future elementary teachers’ interactions with curriculum materials in a mathematics course in the United States. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 763–775.
25.
LloydG. M.BehmS. L. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers’ analysis of mathematics instructional materials. Action in Teacher Education, 26(4), 48–62.
26.
LloydG. M.Pitts BannisterV. R. (Eds.). (2011). Curriculum-based activities and resources for preservice math teachers. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
27.
McClainK.ZhaoQ.VisnovskaJ.BowenE. (2009). Understanding the role of the institutional context in the relationship between teachers and text. In RemillardJ. T.Herbel-EisenmannB. A.LloydG. M. (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 56–69). New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
MorrisA. K.HiebertJ.SpitzerS. M. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: What can preservice teachers learn?Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, 491–529.
29.
NicolC. C.CrespoS. M. (2006). Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 331–355.
30.
RemillardJ. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29, 315–341.
31.
RemillardJ. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-grade teachers’ use of a new mathematics text. Elementary School Journal, 100, 331–350.
32.
RemillardJ. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75, 211–216.
33.
RemillardJ. T.BryansM. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 352–388.
34.
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
35.
ShulmanL. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
36.
SmithM. S.SteinM. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: NCTM.
37.
TERC. (2008). Investigations in number, data, and space (Grade 5, Unit 6): Decimals on grids and number lines. Glenview, IL: Pearson Scott Foresman.
38.
TyminskiA. M.DrakeC.LandT. J. (2013). Developing students’ addition strategies: Pre-service teachers’ learning about and from Standards-based curriculum materials. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 2, 6–26.
39.
TyminskiA. M.LandT. J.DrakeC. (2011). Elementary preservice teachers’ critiques, comparisons, and preferences in examining Standards-based curricular materials. In WiestL. R.LambergT. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Reno, NV: University of Nevada, Reno.
40.
TyminskiA. M.LandT. J.DrakeC. (2013). Elementary preservice teachers reading of educative curriculum: Noticing students’ mathematical thinking. In SuperfineA. C.MartinezM.LarnellG.StoelingaT.MartinD. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago.
41.
UCSMP. (2007). Everyday mathematics: The University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill.
42.
UIC. (2008). Math Trailblazers (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
