Can Value Added Add Value to Teacher Evaluation?

American Statistical Association. (2014). ASA statement on using value-added models for educational assessment. Alexandria, VA: Author.

Amrein-Beardsley A. Collins C. (2012). The SAS Education Value-Added Assessment System (SAS® EVAAS®) in the Houston Independent School District (HISD): Intended and unintended consequences. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(12). Available at http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1096

Ballou D. Springer M. G. (2015). Using student test scores to measure teacher performance: Some problems in the design and implementation of evaluation systems [Special issue]. Educational Researcher, 44, 77–86.

Briggs D. Domingue B. (2011). Due diligence and the evaluation of teachers: A review of the value-added analysis underlying the effectiveness rankings of Los Angeles Unified School District teachers by the Los Angeles Times. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/due-diligence

Corcoran S. (2010). Can teachers be evaluated by their students’ test scores? Should they be? Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform, Brown University.

Darling-Hammond L. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right. New York: Teachers College Press.

Darling-Hammond L. Adamson F. (2014). Beyond the bubble test: How performance assessments support 21^st century learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ferrette C. (2013, November 3). Great Neck teacher sues state over teacher evaluation system. New York Newsday. Available at http://www.newsday.com/long-island/education/great-neck-teacher-sues-state-over-teacher-evaluation-system-1.9581397

Goldhaber D. (2015). Exploring the potential of value-added performance measures to affect the quality of the teacher workforce [Special issue]. Educational Researcher, 44, 87–95.

Goldring E. Grissom J. A. Rubin M. Neumerski C. M. Cannata M. Drake T. Schuermann P. (2015). Make room value added: Principals’ human capital decisions and the emergence of teacher observation data [Special issue]. Educational Researcher, 44, 96–104.

Haertel E. (2013). Reliability and validity of inferences about teachers based on student test scores (Angoff lecture). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Harris D. N. Anderson A. (2011). Bias of public sector worker performance monitoring: Theory and empirical evidence from middle school teachers. Paper presented at the 2011 annual meeting of the Association for Education Finance and Policy.

Jackson C. K. (2012, October). Teacher quality at the high-school level: The importance of accounting for tracks (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 17722). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Jiang J. Y. Sporte S. E. Luppescu S. (2015). Teacher perspectives on evaluation reform: Chicago’s REACH students [Special issue]. Educational Researcher, 44, 105–116.

Johnson S. M. (2015). Will VAMS reinforce the walls of the egg-crate school? [Special issue]. Educational Researcher, 44, 117–126.

Newton X. A. Darling-Hammond L. Haertel E. Thomas E. (2010). Value-added modeling of teacher effectiveness: An exploration of stability across models and contexts. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 18(23).

Pallas A. (2012, May 15). The worst eighth-grade math teacher in New York City. A Sociological Eye on Education. Retrieved December 1, 2012 from http://eyeoned.org/content/the-worst-eighth-grade-math-teacher-in-new-york-city_326/

Rothstein J. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1): 175–214.

Rothstein J. (2011). Review of “learning about teaching: Initial findings from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project.” Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.

Sass T. (2008). The stability of value-added measures of teacher quality and implications for teacher compensation policy. Washington DC: CALDER.