Students’ thinking about the relation between effort and ability can influence their motivation, affect, and academic achievement. Students sometimes think of effort as inversely related to ability (such that people with low ability must work harder than people with high ability) and other times think of effort as positively related to ability (such that hard work can lead people to develop high levels of ability). The purposes of the present review are (a) to review literature on developmental, contextual, and individual difference factors that influence students’ thinking about the relation between effort and ability in school and (b) to identify unresolved questions in this literature and present an extended theoretical framework that can help answer these questions. By providing researchers with a better understanding of how students think about effort and ability, we hope that this review will inspire new research in this area.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
2.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
3.
BanduraA.SchunkD. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586
4.
BempechatJ.LondonP.DweckC. S. (1991). Children’s conceptions of ability in major domains: An interview and an experimental study. Child Study Journal, 21, 11–36.
5.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
6.
BongM.SkaalvikE. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really?Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1–40. doi:10.1023/A:1021302408382
7.
Bouffard-BouchardT.ParentS.LariveeS. (1991). Influence of self-efficacy on self-regulation and performance among junior and senior high school age students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14, 153–164. doi:10.1177/016502549101400203
8.
ButlerR. (2005). Competence assessment, competence, and motivation between early and middle childhood. In ElliottA. J.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 202–221). New York, NY: Guilford.
9.
ChiM. T. H.GlaserR.ReesE. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In SternbergR. S. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
DenissenJ. J.ZarrettN. R.EcclesJ. S. (2007). I like to do it, I’m able, and I know I am: Longitudinal couplings between domain-specific achievement, self-concept, and interest. Child Development, 78, 430–447. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01007.x
11.
DroegeK. L.StipekD. J. (1993). Children’s use of dispositions to predict classmates’ behavior. Developmental Psychology, 29, 646–654. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.646
12.
DurikA. M.VidaM.EcclesJ. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382–393. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.382
13.
DweckC. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
14.
DweckC. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. In WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 57–88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
16.
DweckC. S.MasterA. (2009). Self-theories and motivation. In WentzelK. R.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 123–140). New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
DweckC. S.MoldenD. C. (2005). Self-theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In ElliotA. J.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 122–140). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
FolmerA. S.ColeD. A.SigalA. B.BenbowL. D.SatterwhiteL. F.SwygertK. E.CieslaJ. A. (2008). Age-related changes in children’s understanding of effort and ability: Implications for attribution theory and motivation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 114–134. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2007.09.003
19.
Freedman-DoanC.WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S.BlumenfeldP.ArbretonA.HaroldR. D. (2000). What am I best at? Grade and gender differences in children’s beliefs about ability improvement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 379–402. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973(00)00046-0
20.
GrahamS.BarkerG. P. (1990). The down side of help: An attributional-developmental analysis of helping behavior as a low-ability cue. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 7–14. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.7
21.
GundersonE. A.GripshoverS. J.RomeroC.DweckC. S.Goldin-MeadowS.LevineS. C. (2013). Parent praise to 1- to 3-year-olds predicts children’s motivational frameworks 5 years later. Child Development, 84, 1526–1541. doi:10.1111/cdev.12064
22.
HarariO.CovingtonM. (1981). Reactions to achievement behavior from a teacher and student perspective: A developmental analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 15–28. doi:10.3102/00028312018001015
23.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley. doi:10.1037/10628-000
24.
HeymanG. D.ComptonB. J. (2006). Context sensitivity in children’s reasoning about ability across the elementary school years. Developmental Science, 9, 616–627. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00540.x
25.
HeymanG. D.GeeC. L.GilesJ. W. (2003). Preschool children’s reasoning about ability. Child Development, 74, 516–534. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.7402013
26.
HollowayS. D. (1988). Concepts of ability and effort in Japan and the United States. Review of Educational Research, 58, 327–345. doi:10.3102/00346543058003327
27.
HongY.ChiuC.DweckC. S.LinD. M. S.WanW. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588–599. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588
28.
HuX.ChenY.TianB. (2016). Feeling better about self after receiving negative feedback: When the sense that ability can be improved is activated. Journal of Psychology, 150, 72–87. doi:10.1080/00223980.2015.1004299
29.
JagacinskiC. M.NichollsJ. G. (1984). Conceptions of ability and related affects in task involvement and ego involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 909–919. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.909
30.
JagacinskiC. M.NichollsJ. G. (1987). Competence and affect in task involvement and ego involvement: The impact of social comparison information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 107–114. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.107
31.
JonesB. D.WilkinsJ. L. M.LongM. H.WangF. (2012). Testing a motivational model of achievement: How students’ mathematical beliefs and interests are related to their achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 1–20. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0062-9
32.
JuvonenJ.MurdockT. B. (1995). Grade-level differences in the social value of effort: Implications for self-presentation tactics of early adolescents. Child Development, 66, 1694–1705. doi:10.2307/1131904
33.
KaplanA.MaehrM. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141–184. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5
34.
KarabenickJ.HellerK. (1976). A developmental study of effort and ability attributions. Developmental Psychology, 12, 559–560. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.12.6.559
35.
KinlawC. R.Kurtz-CostesB. (2003). The development of children’s beliefs about intelligence. Developmental Review, 23, 125–161. doi:10.1016/S0273-2297(03)00010-8
36.
KoriatA.Ma’ayanH.NussinsonR. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 36–69. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.36
37.
KoriatA.NussinsonR.AckermanR. (2014). Judgments of learning depend on how learners interpret study effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1624–1637. doi:10.1037/xlm0000009
38.
KunA. (1977). Development of the magnitude-covariation and compensation schemata in ability and effort attributions of performance. Child Development, 48, 862–873. doi:10.2307/1128335
39.
Kurtz-CostesB.McCallR. J.KinlawC. R.WiesenC. A.JoynerM. H. (2005). What does it mean to be smart? The development of children’s beliefs about intelligence in Germany and the United States. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 217–233. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2004.12.005
40.
LiW.LeeA. (2004). A review of conceptions of ability and related motivational constructs in achievement motivation. Quest, 56, 439–461. doi:10.1080/00336297.2004.10491836
41.
MarshH. W.CravenR. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133–163. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x
42.
MiddletonM. J.MidgleyC. (2002). Beyond motivation: Middle school students’ perceptions of press for understanding in math. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 373–391. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1101
43.
MidgleyC.KaplanA.MiddletonM.MaehrM. L.UrdanT.AndermanL. H.AndermanE.RoeserR. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113–131. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.0965
44.
MieleD. B.MoldenD. C. (2010). Naïve theories of intelligence and the role of processing fluency in perceived comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 535–557. doi:10.1037/a0019745
45.
MieleD. B.ScholerA. A. (2016). Self-regulation of motivation. In WentzelK. R.MieleD. B. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 363–384). New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
MieleD. B.SonL. K.MetcalfeJ. (2013). Children’s naïve theories of intelligence influence their metacognitive judgments. Child Development, 84, 1879–1886. doi:10.1111/cdev.12101
47.
MillerA. (1985). A developmental study of the cognitive basis of performance impairment after failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 529–538. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.529
48.
MuellerC. M.DweckC. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33–52. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33
49.
MuenksK.MieleD. B.WigfieldA. (2016). Students’ perceptions of the source of effort influence ability judgments of other students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 438–454. doi:10.1037/edu0000068
50.
NichollsJ. G. (1978). The development of the concepts of effort and ability, perception of academic attainment, and the understanding that difficult tasks require more ability. Child Development, 49, 800–814. doi:10.2307/1128250
51.
NichollsJ. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
52.
NichollsJ. G.MillerA. T. (1984). Reasoning about the ability of self and others: A developmental study. Child Development, 55, 1990–1999. doi:10.2307/1129774
53.
NichollsJ. G.PatashnickM.MettetalG. (1986). Conceptions of ability and intelligence. Child Development, 57, 636–645. doi:10.2307/1130342
54.
PajaresF. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving of gifted students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 325–344. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0025
55.
ParkD.GundersonE. A.TsukayamaE.LevineS. C.BeilockS. L. (2016). Young children’s motivational frameworks and math achievement: Relation to teacher-reported instructional practices, but not teacher theory of intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 300–313. doi:10.1037/edu0000064
56.
PauneskuD.WaltonG. M.RomeroC.SmithE. N.YeagerD. S.DweckC. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26, 784–793. doi:10.1177/0956797615571017
57.
PomerantzE. M.KempnerS. G. (2013). Mothers’ daily person and process praise: Implications for children’s theory of intelligence and motivation. Developmental Psychology, 49, 2040–2046. doi:10.1037/a0031840.
58.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
RholesW. S.BlackwellJ.JordanC.WaltersC. (1980). A developmental study of learned helplessness. Developmental Psychology, 16, 616–624. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.16.6.616
60.
RholesW. S.JonesM.WadeC. (1988). Children’s understanding of personal dispositions and its relationship to behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45, 1–17. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(88)90047-1
61.
RholesW. S.RubleD. N. (1984). Children’s understanding of dispositional characteristics of others. Child Development, 55, 550–560. doi:10.2307/1129966
62.
RickertN. P.MerasI. L.WitkowM. R. (2014). Theories of intelligence and students’ daily self-handicapping behaviors. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.08.002
63.
RoqueI.de LemosM. S.GonçalvesT. (2014). A longitudinal developmental analysis of students’ causality beliefs about school performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29, 159–173. doi:10.1007/s10212-013-0192-3
64.
RosenholtzS. J.SimpsonC. (1984). The formation of ability conceptions: Developmental trend or social construction?Review of Educational Research, 54, 31–63. doi:10.3102/00346543054001031
65.
SchunkD. H. (1983). Ability versus effort attributional feedback: Differential effects on self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 848–885. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.75.6.848
66.
SchunkD. H.DiBenedettoM. K. (2016). Self-efficacy theory in education. In WentzelK. R.MieleD. B. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 34–54). New York, NY: Routledge.
67.
SimpkinsS. D.Davis-KeanP. E.EcclesJ. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42, 70–83. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70
68.
SinghR.SinghP. (1994). Prediction of performance using motivation and ability information: New light on integrational capacity and weighting strategies. Cognitive Development, 9, 455–496. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(94)90015-9
69.
SkinnerE. A. (1990). Age differences in the dimensions of perceived control during middle childhood: Implications for developmental conceptualizations and research. Child Development, 61, 1882–1890. doi:10.2307/1130844
70.
StipekD. J.DanielsD. H. (1990). Children’s use of dispositional attributions in predicting the performance and behavior of classmates. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 11, 13–28. doi:10.1016/0193-3973(90)90029-J
71.
StipekD. J.TannattL. M. (1984). Children’s judgments of their own and their peers’ academic competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 75–84. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.75
72.
SurberC. F. (1980). The development of reversible operations in judgments of ability, effort, and performance. Child Development, 51, 1018–1029. doi:10.2307/1129539
73.
SurberC. F. (1984a). Inferences of ability and effort: Evidence for two different processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 249–268. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.249
74.
SurberC. F. (1984b). The development of achievement-related judgment processes. In NichollsJ. (Ed.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 137–184). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
75.
TempelaarD. T.RientiesB.GiesbersB.GijselaersW. H. (2015). The pivotal role of effort beliefs in mediating implicit theories of intelligence and achievement goals and academic motivations. Social Psychology of Education, 18, 101–120. doi:10.1007/s11218-014-9281-7
76.
TrautweinU.LüdtkeO.RobertsB. W.SchnyderI.NiggliA. (2009). Different forces, same consequence: Conscientiousness and competence beliefs are independent predictors of academic effort and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1115–1128. doi:10.1037/a0017048
77.
WangM. T. (2012). Educational and career interests in math: A longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1643–1657. doi:10.1037/a0027247
78.
WeinerB. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.3
79.
WeinerB. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
80.
WeinerB. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1
81.
WigfieldA.TonksS.KlaudaS. L. (2016). Expectancy-value theory. In WentzelK. R.MieleD. B. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 55–74). New York, NY: Routledge.
82.
WimmerH.WachterJ.PernerJ. (1982). Cognitive autonomy of the development of moral evaluation of achievement. Child Development, 53, 668–676. doi:10.2307/1129379
83.
YeagerD. S.DweckC. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302–314. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
84.
YussenS.KaneP. (1985). Children’s conceptions of intelligence. In YussenS. R. (Ed.), The growth of reflection in children (pp. 207–241). New York, NY: Academic Press.
