Although wide variation in teacher effectiveness is well established, much less is known about differences in teacher improvement over time. We document that average returns to teaching experience mask large variation across individual teachers and across groups of teachers working in different schools. We examine the role of school context in explaining these differences using a measure of the professional environment constructed from teachers responses to state-wide surveys. Our analyses show that teachers working in more supportive professional environments improve their effectiveness more over time than teachers working in less supportive contexts. On average, teachers working in schools at the 75th percentile of professional environment ratings improved 38% more than teachers in schools at the 25th percentile after 10 years.
AllenJ. P.PiantaR. C.GregoryA.MikamiA. Y.LunJ. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333, 1034–1037.
AtteberryA.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2012). Do first impressions matter? Improvement in early career teacher effectiveness (No. w19096). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
4.
BlaseJ.BlaseJ. (1999). Implementation of shared governance for instructional improvement: Principals’ perspectives. Journal of Educational Administration, 37, 476–500.
5.
BoydD.GrossmanP.IngM.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2011). The influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 303–333.
6.
Boyd.D.GrossmanP.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2008). Measuring effect sizes: The effect of measurement error. Paper prepared for the National Conference on Value-Added Modeling, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
7.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.RockoffJ.WyckoffJ. (2008). The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 793–818.
BrykA.SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
10.
BrykA.SebringP. B.AllensworthE.LuppescuS.EastonJ. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 778–820.
12.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effect. Economics of Education Review, 26, 673–682.
13.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L.WheelerJ. (2007). High-poverty schools and the distribution of teachers and principals. North Carolina Law Review, 85, 1345–1379.
14.
CoburnC. E.RussellJ. L.KaufmanJ. H.SteinM. K. (2012). Supporting sustainability: teachers’ advice networks and ambitious instructional reform. American Journal of Education, 119, 137–182.
15.
CorrentiR. (2007). An empirical investigation of professional development effects on literacy instruction using daily logs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 262–295.
16.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199.
17.
DesimoneL. M.PorterA. C.GaretM. S.YoonK. S.BirmanB. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112.
18.
GaretM. S.CronenS.EatonM.KurkiA.LudwigM.JonesW.. . . SztejnbergL. (2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
19.
GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DesimoneL.BirmanB. F.YoonK. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
20.
GlazermanS.DolfinS.BleekerM.JohnsonA.IsenbergE.Lugo-GilJ.. . . BrittonE. (2008). Impacts of comprehensive teacher induction: Results from the first year of a randomized controlled study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
21.
GoldhaberD.LiddleS.TheobaldR. (2013). The gateway to the profession: Assessing teacher preparation programs based on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 36, 29–44.
22.
GrissomJ. A. (2011). Can good principals keep teachers in disadvantaged schools? Linking principal effectiveness to teacher satisfaction and turnover in hard-to-staff environments. Teachers College Record, 113, 2552–2585.
23.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24.
HanushekE. A.RivkinS. G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100, 267–271.
25.
HarrisD.SassT. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality, and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 798–812.
26.
JacksonC. K.BruegmannE. (2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 85–108.
27.
JacobB. A.LefgrenL. (2004). The impact of teacher training on student achievement quasi-experimental evidence from school reform efforts in Chicago. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 50–79.
28.
JohnsonS. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York, NY: Basic Books.
29.
JohnsonS. M. (2009). How best to add value? Striking a balance between the individual and the organization in school reform (EPI Briefing Paper #249). Retrieved from http://www.epi.org/publication/bp249/
30.
JohnsonS. M.BirkelandS. E. (2003). Pursuing a “sense of success”: New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 581–617.
31.
JohnsonS. M.KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement [Special issue]. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39.
32.
KalogridesD.LoebS.BeteilleT. (2011). Power play? Teacher characteristics and class assignments (CALDER Working Paper No. 59). Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/publications/1001530.html
33.
KaneT. J.RockoffJ. E.StaigerD. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27, 615–631.
34.
KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2008). Estimating teacher impacts on student achievement: An experimental evaluation (NBER Working Paper No. 14607). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w14607
35.
KanterR. M. (1984). The change masters. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
36.
KaufmanD.JohnsonS. M.KardosS. M.LiuE.PeskeH. (2002). “Lost at sea”: New teachers’ experiences with curriculum and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104, 273–300.
37.
KennedyM. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39, 591–598.
38.
KoedelC.ParsonsE.PodgurskyM.EhlertM. (in press). Teacher preparation programs and teacher quality: Are there real differences across programs. Education Finance and Policy.
LaddH. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 235–261.
41.
LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62.
42.
LoebS.Darling-HammondL.LuczakJ. (2005). How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(3), 44–70.
43.
LoebS.KalogridesD.BeteilleT. (2012). Effective schools: Teacher hiring, assignment, development, and retention. Education Finance and Policy, 7, 269–304.
44.
LortieD. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
MatsumuraL. C.GarnierH. E.ResnickL. B. (2010). Implementing literacy coaching: The role of school social resources. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 249–272.
46.
MayH.SupovitzJ. A. (2011). The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 332–352.
47.
McCaffreyD. F.LockwoodJ. R.KoretzD.LouisT. A.HamiltonL. A. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 67–101.
48.
MurnaneR. J.PhillipsB. R. (1981). Learning by doing, vintage, and selection: Three pieces of the puzzle relating teaching experience and teaching performance. Economics of Education Review, 1, 453–465.
49.
MurnaneR. J.WillettJ. B. (2010). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
50.
NeumanS. B.CunninghamL. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 532–566.
PapayJ. P.WestM. R.FullertonJ. B.KaneT. J. (2012). Does an urban teacher residency increase student achievement? Early evidence from Boston. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 413–434.
53.
RockoffJ. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94, 247–252.
54.
RockoffJ. E.JacobB. A.KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2011). Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one?Education Finance and Policy, 6, 43–74.
55.
RonfeldtM. (2012). Where should student teachers learn to teach? Effects of field placement school characteristics on teacher retention and effectiveness. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 3–26.
56.
SassT.HannawayJ.XuZ.FiglioD.FengL. (2012). Value added of teachers in high-poverty schools and lower-poverty schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 72, 104–122.
57.
SteinbergM. P.AllensworthE.JohnsonD. W. (2011, May). Student and teacher safety in Chicago Public Schools: The roles of community context and school social organization. Consortium on Chicago School Research. Retrieved from http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/downloads/8499safety_in_cps.pdf
58.
TaylorE. S.TylerJ. H. (2012). The effect of evaluation on teacher performance. American Economic Review, 102, 3628–3651.
59.
ToddP. E.WolpinK. I. (2003). On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. The Economic Journal, 113(485), F3–F33.
60.
WatersT.MarzanoR. J.McNultyB. (2003). Balanced leadership®: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
61.
WayneA. J.YoonK. S.ZhuP.CronenS.GaretM. S. (2008). Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods. Educational Researcher, 37, 469–479.
62.
WayneA. J.YoungsP. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73, 89–122.
63.
WiswallM. (2013). The dynamics of teacher quality. Journal of Public Economics, 100, 61–78.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
