Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Discipline reformers claim that suspensions negatively affect suspended students, while others suggest reforms have unintended consequences for peers. Using student panel data from the School District of Philadelphia, we implement student fixed effects and instrumental variable (IV) strategies to examine the consequences of suspensions for offending students and their peers. A suspension decreases math and reading achievement for suspended students. The effects are robust to IV estimates leveraging a district-wide policy change in suspension use. Suspensions are more salient for students who personally experience suspension than for their peers. Exposure to suspensions for more serious misconduct has very small, negative spillovers onto peer achievement, but does not change peer absences.

Keywords

discipline policy reform out-of-school suspensions student absences student achievement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akiba

(2008). Predictors of student fear of school violence: A comparative study of eighth graders in 33 countries. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19, 51–72.

Altonji

J. G.

Elder

T. E.

Taber

C. R.

(2005). An evaluation of instrumental variable strategies for estimating the effects of Catholic schooling. Journal of Human Resources, 40, 791–821.

Arcia

(2006). Achievement and enrollment status of suspended students: Outcomes in a large, multicultural school district. Education and Urban Society, 38, 359–369.

Arum

(2003). Judging school discipline: The crisis of moral authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Aucejo

E. M.

Romano

T. F.

(2016). Assessing the effect of school days and absences on test score performance. Economics of Education Review, 55, 70–87.

Baker

Sigmon

Nugent

(2001). Truancy reduction: Keeping students in school. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/188947.pdf

Balfanz

Byrnes

Fox

J. H

. (2015). Sent home and put off track: The antecedents, disproportionalities, and consequences of being suspended in the 9th grade. In Losen

(Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 17–30). New York City: Teachers College Press.

Bradshaw

C. P.

Mitchell

M. M.

Leaf

P. J.

(2010). Examining the effects of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on student outcomes results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 133–148.

Burdick-Will

(2016). Neighborhood violent crime and academic growth in Chicago: Lasting effects of early exposure. Social Forces, 95, 133–158.

10.

Carrell

S. E.

Hoekstra

M. L.

(2010). Externalities in the classroom: How children exposed to domestic violence affect everyone’s kids. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 211–228.

11.

Chen

(2007). School disorder and student achievement: A study of New York City elementary schools. Journal of School Violence, 6, 27–43.

12.

Chen

Weikart

L. A.

(2008). Student background, school climate, school disorder, and student achievement: An empirical study of New York City’s middle schools. Journal of School Violence, 7(4), 3–20.

13.

Cobb-Clark

D. A.

Kassenboehmer

S. C.

McVicar

Zhang

(2015). Is there an educational penalty for being suspended from school? Education Economics, 23, 376–395.

14.

Coelho

V. A.

Marchante

Jimerson

S. R.

(2017). Promoting a positive middle school transition: A randomized-controlled treatment study examining self-concept and self-esteem. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 558–569.

15.

Davis

J. E.

Jordan

W. J.

(1994). The effects of school context, structure, and experiences on African American males in middle and high school. The Journal of Negro Education, 63, 570–587.

16.

Deming

D. J.

(2011). Better schools, less crime? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 2063–2115.

17.

Galván

Spatzier

Juvonen

(2011). Perceived norms and social values to capture school culture in elementary and middle school. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 346–353.

18.

Gershenson

Jacknowitz

Brannegan

(2017). Are student absences worth the worry in U.S. primary schools? Education Finance and Policy, 12, 137–165.

19.

Gottfried

M. A.

(2014). Chronic absenteeism and its effects on students’ academic and socioemotional outcomes. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 19, 53–75.

20.

Gottfried

M. A.

(2015). Chronic absenteeism in the classroom context: Effects on achievement. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085915618709

21.

Horner

R. H.

Sugai

Smolkowski

Eber

Nakasato

Todd

A. W.

Esperanza

(2009). A randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behavior support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 133–144.

22.

Houtenville

A. J.

Conway

K. S.

(2008). Parental effort, school resources, and student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 437–453.

23.

Imberman

S. A.

Kugler

A. D.

Sacerdote

B. I.

(2012). Katrina’s children: Evidence on the structure of peer effects from hurricane evacuees. The American Economic Review, 102, 2048–2082.

24.

Jez

S. J.

Wassmer

R. W.

(2015). The impact of learning time on academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 47, 284–306.

25.

Kinsler

(2013). School discipline: A source or salve for the racial achievement gap? International Economic Review, 54, 355–383.

26.

Lacoe

(2015). Unequally safe the race gap in school safety. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 13, 143–168.

27.

Lacoe

(2016). Too scared to learn? The academic consequences of feeling unsafe in the classroom. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085916674059

28.

Lacoe

Steinberg

M. P.

(2018). Rolling back zero tolerance: The effect of discipline policy reform on suspension usage and student outcomes. Peabody Journal of Education, 93, 207–227.

29.

Marchbanks

M. P.

III Blake

J. J.

Booth

E. A.

Carmichael

Seibert

A. L.

Fabelo

(2014). The economic effects of exclusionary discipline on grade retention and high school dropout. In Losen

(Ed). Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 59–74). New York City: Teachers College Press.

30.

Mijanovich

Weitzman

B. C.

(2003). Which “broken windows” matter? School, neighborhood, and family characteristics associated with youths’ feelings of unsafety. Journal of Urban Health, 80, 400–415.

31.

Noltemeyer

A. L.

Ward

R. M.

Mcloughlin

(2015). Relationship between school suspension and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 44, 224–240.

32.

Perry

B. L.

Morris

E. W.

(2014). Suspending progress collateral consequences of exclusionary punishment in public schools. American Sociological Review, 79, 1067–1087.

33.

Petrilli

M. J.

(2016). Should charter schools be pressured to reduce suspensions? Education Next. Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/should-charter-schools-be-pressured-to-reduce-suspensions

34.

Rausch

M. K.

Skiba

R. J.

(2005). The academic cost of discipline: The relationship between suspension/expulsion and school achievement. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~atlantic/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Academic-Cost-of-School-Discipline.pdf

35.

Rumberger

R. W.

Losen

D. J.

(2016). The high cost of harsh discipline and its disparate impact. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles. Retrieved from https://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/resources/projects/center-for-civil-rights-remedies/school-to-prison-folder/federal-reports/the-high-cost-of-harsh-discipline-and-its-disparate-impact/UCLA_HighCost_6-2_948.pdf

36.

Segal

(2008). Classroom behavior. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 783–814.

37.

Sharkey

Schwartz

A. E.

Ellen

I. G.

Lacoe

(2014). High stakes in the classroom, high stakes on the street: The effects of community violence on students’ standardized test performance. Sociological Science, 1, 199–220.

38.

Sharkey

P. T.

Tirado-Strayer

Papachristos

A. V.

Raver

C. C.

(2012). The effect of local violence on children’s attention and impulse control. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 2287–2293.

39.

Steinberg

M. P.

Allensworth

Johnson

D. W.

(2011). Student and teacher safety in Chicago public schools: The roles of community context and school social organization. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

40.

Steinberg

M. P.

Lacoe

(2017). What do we know about school discipline reform? Assessing the alternatives to suspensions and expulsions. Education Next, 17(1), 44–52.

41.

Theriot

M. T.

Dupper

D. R.

(2010). Student discipline problems and the transition from elementary to middle school. Education and Urban Society, 42, 205–222.

42.

Watanabe

. (2013, May 14). L.A. Unified bans suspension for “willful defiance.” Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/2013/may/14/local/la-me-lausd-suspension-20130515

43.

Way

S. M.

(2011). School discipline and disruptive classroom behavior: The moderating effects of student perceptions. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 346–375.

44.

Wolf

K. C.

Kupchik

(2017). School suspensions and adverse experiences in adulthood. Justice Quarterly, 407–430.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.06 MB

0.00 MB