This study is the first large-scale examination of the impact of for-profit colleges on the enrollment and outcomes of students at other postsecondary institutions. Using data primarily from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) and a differences-in-differences approach, I estimate the effect of a new for-profit college opening on community college enrollments and degree completions, as well as county education levels. My results suggest that community college enrollments and degree completions do not decline when a new degree-granting for-profit college opens nearby. Furthermore, I find evidence that the county-level production of short- and long-term certificates increases after a new for-profit college opens, though the number of associate’s degrees does not increase. This evidence should serve to broaden conversations about the role of for-profit colleges in the larger landscape of the American higher education system.
AndersonC.BowmanM. J.TintoV. (1972). Where colleges are and who attends. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
2.
BackesB.Dunlop VelezE. (2015). Who transfers and where do they go? Community college students in Florida (Calder working paper). Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
BanuelosN. (2016). From commercial schools to corporate universities: Explaining the shift in proprietary business education in the U.S. 1970-1990. The Journal of Higher Education, 87, 573–600.
5.
BarrA.TurnerS. (2013). Expanding enrollments and contracting state budgets: The effect of the great recession on higher education. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 650, 168–193.
6.
BrenemanD. W. (2006). The University of Phoenix: Icon of for-profit higher education. In BrenemanD. W.PusserB.TurnerS. E. (Eds.), Earnings from learning: The rise of for-profit universities (pp. 71–92). Albany: State University of New York Press.
7.
BrintS.KarabelJ. (1989). The diverted dream: Community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900-1985. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
CardD. (1995). Using geographic variation in college proximity to estimate the return to schooling. In ChristofidesL. N.Kenneth GrantE.SwidinskyR.VanderkampJ. (Eds.), Aspects of labour market behaviour: Essays in honour of John Vanderkamp. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
9.
CelliniS. (2009). Crowded colleges and college crowd-out: The impact of public subsidies on the two-year college market. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(2), 1–30.
10.
CelliniS. (2012). For-profit higher education: An assessment of costs and benefits. National Tax Journal, 65, 153–180.
11.
CelliniS.ChaudharyL. (2014). The labor market returns to a for-profit college education. Economics of Education Review, 43, 125–140.
ChungA. (2012). Choice of for-profit college. Economics of Education Review, 31, 1084–1101.
14.
The College Board. (2011). Trends in community college education: Enrollment, prices, student aid and debt levels. Washington, DC: Author.
15.
The College Board. (2013). Education pays. Washington, DC: Author.
16.
CottomT. (2017). Lower ed: The troubling rise of the for-profit colleges in the new economy. New York, NY: The New Press.
17.
DaroliaR.KoedelC.MartorellP.WilsonK.Perez-ArceF. (2015). Do employers prefer workers who attend for-profit colleges? Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34, 881–903.
18.
DemingD.GoldinC.KatzL. (2012). The for-profit postsecondary school sector: Nimble critters or agile predators?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26, 139–164.
19.
DemingD.YutchtmanN.AbulafiA.GoldinC.KatzL. (2016). The value of postsecondary credentials in the labor market: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 106, 778–806.
GilpinG.SaundersJ.StoddardC. (2015). Why have for-profit colleges expanded so rapidly? The role of labor market changes in student enrollment and degree completion at two-year colleges. Economics of Education Review, 45, 53–63.
23.
IlohC.TierneyW. (2014). Understanding for-profit college and community college choice through rational choice. Teachers College Record, 116, 1–34.
24.
KatsinasS.LaceyV.AdairJ.KohJ.D’AmicoM.FriedelJ. (2013). Halfway out of recession, but a long way to go: The 2013 national survey of access and finance issues. Tuscaloosa: Education Policy Center, The University of Alabama. Retrieved from http://www.aascu.org/meetings/hegrc13/UofAlabamaSurvey.pdf
LongB. T. (2004). How have college decisions changed over time? An application of the conditional logistic choice model. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 271–296.
27.
LongB. T.KurlaenderM. (2009). Do community colleges provide a viable pathway to a Baccalaureate degree?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 30–53.
28.
MarcotteD.BaileyT.BorkoskiC.KienzlG. (2005). The returns of a community college education: Evidence from the National Education Longitudinal Study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 157–175.
29.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
31.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
32.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). The condition of education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
33.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Enroll-ment and employees in postsecondary institutions, fall 2015; and financial statistics and academic libraries, fiscal year 2015. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34.
NiuS. (2015). Leaving home state for college: Differences by race/ethnicity and parental education. Research in Higher Education, 56, 325–359.
35.
Ohio Revised Code. (1963). 3354.07 Community college plan—approval by board of regents. In Title [33] XXXIII Education—Libraries. Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 3354.07. Retrieved from http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/3354
36.
OrdovenskyJ. (1995). Effects of institutional attributes on enrollment choice: Implications for vocational postsecondary education. Economics of Education Review, 14, 335–350.
RosenbaumJ.Deil-AmenR.PersonA. (2006). After admission: From college access to college success. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
39.
RouseC. (1993). Democratization or diversion? The effect of community colleges on educational attainment (National Bureau of Economics Working Paper No. 313).
TurnerS. E. (2006). For-profit colleges in the context of the market for higher education. In BrenemanD. W.PusserB.TurnerS. E. (Eds.), Earnings from learning: The rise of for-profit universities (pp. 51–68). Albany: State University of New York Press.
42.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2010). For-profit colleges: Undercover testing finds colleges encouraged fraud and engaged in deceptive and questionable marketing practices (Testimony before the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, U.S. Senate). Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-948T
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
