In 2019, Maryland’s Howard County Public School System (HCPSS) attempted to redistrict, or redraw school attendance boundaries, to desegregate. Whereas political resistance and legal constraints have thwarted redistricting efforts elsewhere, HCPSS’s diversity and commitments to equity positioned it favorably to desegregate. Using a mixed methods design, I explore how political factors shaped (a) different redistricting alternatives’ potential to reduce segregation and (b) segregation rates under the new attendance boundaries. I find that, despite some advocacy for desegregation, resistance from White and Asian parents led the school board to enact a segregative redistricting plan. Findings highlight the challenges with redistricting to reduce segregation, but also point to policy changes that could help districts capitalize on their limited remaining opportunities to desegregate.
AllisonG.ZelikowP. (1999). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.
3.
BartelsB.DonatoR. (2009). Unmasking the school re-zoning process: Race and class in a Northern Colorado community. Latino Studies, 7(2), 222–249.
4.
BierbaumA. H.SundermanG. L. (2021). School desegregation, school re-zoning, and growth management in two Maryland counties. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 29(165), 1–34.
5.
BillK. (2024). Helping the cause or “fanning the flames?”: County council involvement in a post-PICS school desegregation effort. Manuscript submitted for publication.
6.
BischoffK. (2008). School district fragmentation and racial residential segregation: How do boundaries matter?Urban Affairs Review, 44(2), 182–217.
7.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2018). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America (5th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
BrennanM. E. (2018). Whiter and wealthier: “Local control” hinders desegregation by permitting school district secessions. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 52(1), 39–84.
9.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
10.
CarlsonD.BellE.LenardM. A.CowenJ. M.McEachinA. (2020). Socioeconomic-based school assignment policy and racial segregation levels: Evidence from the Wake County Public School System. American Educational Research Journal, 57(1), 258–304.
11.
CastroA. J.ParryM.Siegel-HawleyG. (2022). “All schools are not created equal”: An analysis of public comments on school rezoning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30(13), 1–34.
12.
CastroA. J.Siegel-HawleyG.BridgesK.WilliamsS. E. (2022). Narratives of race in school rezoning: How the politics of Whiteness shape belonging, leadership decisions, and school attendance boundaries. AERA Open, 8(1), 1–14.
13.
CastroA. J.Siegel-HawleyG.BridgesK.WilliamsS. E. (2024). Drawn into policy: A systematic review of school rezoning rationales, processes, and outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 94(4), 539–583.
CreswellJ. W.CreswellJ. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
18.
DahlR. A. (1984). Modern political analysis (4th ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc.
19.
DeCuir-GunbyJ. T.SchutzP. A. (2017). Developing a mixed methods proposal: A practical guide for beginning researchers. Sage Publications.
20.
DiamondJ. B.LewisA. E. (2022). Opportunity hoarding and the maintenance of “White” educational space. American Behavioral Scientist, 66(11), 1470–1489.
21.
DiemS.FrankenbergE.ClearlyC. (2015). Factors that influence school board policy making: The political context of student diversity in urban-suburban districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(5), 712–752.
22.
DominaT.Pharris-CiurejN.PennerA. M.PennerE. K.BrummetQ.PorterS. R.SanabriaT. (2018). Is free and reduced-price lunch a valid measure of educational disadvantage?Educational Researcher, 47(9), 539–555.
23.
EastonD. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. John Wiley & Sons.
24.
FrankenbergE. (2017). Assessing segregation under a new generation of controlled choice policies. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1S), 219S–250S.
25.
FrankenbergE.DiemS. (2013). School board leadership and policymaking in changing political environments. Urban Review, 45, 117–142.
GillaniN.BeefermanD.Vega-PourheydarianC.OverneyC.Van HentenryckP.RoyD. (2023). Redrawing attendance boundaries to promote racial and ethnic diversity in elementary schools. Educational Researcher, 52(6), 348–364.
31.
GlaserB. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.
32.
HolmeJ. J.DiemS.WeltonA. (2014). Suburban school districts and demographic change: The technical, normative, and political dimensions of response. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(1), 34–66.
33.
HolmeJ. J.FinniganK. S.DiemS. (2016). Challenging boundaries, changing fate? Metropolitan inequality and the legacy of Milliken. Teachers College Record, 118, 1–40.
KingdonJ. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.
39.
LareauA.WeiningerE. B.Barrett CoxA. (2018). Parental challenges to organizational authority in an elite school district: The role of cultural, social, and symbolic capital. Teachers College Record, 120, 1–46.
40.
LeonardoZ. (2009). Race, whiteness, and education. Routledge.
LiuR. Z.LiuW. M.WongJ. S.ShinR. Q. (2023). Anti-Black racism and Asian American local educational activism: A critical race discourse analysis. Educational Researcher. Advance online publication.
43.
Lung-AmamW. (2023). The not-so-new South suburbs: Asian immigration and the politics of school integration in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 9(2), 55–74.
MalenB. (2006). Revisiting policy implementation as a political phenomenon: The case of reconstitution policies. In HonigM. I. (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 83–104). State University of New York Press.
46.
Malen (Anderson)B. (1983). The politics of persistence: The legislative process resulting in Minnesota’s tuition tax concession statues for elementary-secondary education [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Minnesota.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67(2), 281–315.
51.
MaweneD.BalA. (2020). Spatial othering: Examining residential areas, school attendance zones, and school discipline in an urbanizing school district. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(91), 1–26.
52.
MazzoniT. L. (1991). Analyzing state school policymaking: An arena model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(2), 115–138.
53.
McDermottK. A.DeBrayE.FrankenbergE. (2012). How does Parents Involved in Community Schools matter? Legal and political influence in education politics and policy. Teachers College Record, 114(12), 1–39.
54.
McRaeE. G. (2018). Mothers of massive resistance: White women and the politics of white supremacy. Oxford University Press.
55.
MenendianS.GambhirS.GailesA. (2021). The roots of structural racism project: Twenty-first century racial residential segregation in the United States. Othering and Belonging Institute, University of California, Berkeley. https://belonging.berkeley.edu/roots-structural-racism
56.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2022). Common core of data: America’s public schools. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/
ReardonS. F.GrewalE. T.KalogridesD.GreenbergE. (2012). Brown fades: The end of court-ordered school desegregation and the resegregation of American public schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31(4), 876–904.
67.
ReardonS. F.WeathersE. S.FahleE. M.JangH.KalogridesD. (2024). Is separate still unequal? New evidence on school segregation and racial academic achievement gaps. American Sociological Review, 89(6), 971–1010.
68.
ReardonS. F.YunJ. (2003). Integrating neighborhoods, segregating schools: The retreat from school desegregation in the South, 1990–2000. North Carolina Law Review, 81(4), 1563–1596.
69.
ReardonS. F.YunJ. T.KurlaenderM. (2006). Implications of income-based school assignment policies for racial school segregation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(1), 49–75.
70.
Siegel-HawleyG. (2013). Educational gerrymandering? Race and attendance boundaries in a demographically changing suburb. Harvard Educational Review, 83(4), 580–612.
71.
Siegel-HawleyG. (2016). When the fences come down: Twenty-first-century lessons from metropolitan school desegregation. The University of North Carolina Press.
Siegel-HawleyG.BridgesK.ShieldsT. J. (2017). Solidifying segregation or promoting diversity? School closure and rezoning in an urban district. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(1), 107–141.
74.
Siegel-HawleyG.CastroA. J.BridgesK.TaylorK. (2021). Race and school rezoning criteria. [Policy Brief]. Contexts, 20(3), 72–75.
75.
Siegel-HawleyG.DiemS.FrankenbergE. (2018). The disintegration of Memphis-Shelby County, Tennessee: School district secession and local control in the 21st century. American Educational Research Journal, 55(4), 651–692.
76.
TaylorK.FrankenbergE. (2021). Student assignment policies and racial and income segregation of schools, school attendance zones, and neighborhoods. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(5), 747–775.
WeathersE. S.SosinaV. E. (2022). Separate remains unequal: Contemporary segregation and racial disparities in school district revenue. American Educational Research Journal, 59(5), 905–938.
85.
WellsA. S.HolmeJ. J.AtandaA. K.RevillaA. T. (2005). Tackling racial segregation one policy at a time: Why school desegregation only went so far. Teachers College Record, 107(9), 2141–2177.
86.
YinR. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
