A method for medical screening is adapted to differential item functioning (DIF). Its essential elements are explicit declarations of the level of DIF that is acceptable and of the loss function that quantifies the consequences of the two kinds of inappropriate classification of an item. Instead of a single level and a single function, sets of plausible levels and plausible functions may be declared. Some extensions are outlined, and a simulation study is presented.
BergerJ. O. (1985). Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
2.
DeGrootM. H. (2004). Optimal statistical decisions. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
3.
DoransN.HollandP. W. (1993). DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization. In HollandP. W.WainerH. (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 35–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
HollandP. W. (1987a). Expansion and comments on Marco’s rational approach to flagging items for DIF. Princeton, NJ: ETS internal memorandum.
5.
HollandP. W. (1987b). More on rational approach to item flagging. Princeton, NJ: ETS internal memorandum.
6.
HollandP. W. (2004). Comments on the definitions of A, B, and C items in DIF. Unpublished manuscript.
7.
HollandP. W.ThayerD. (1988). Differential item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In WainerH.BraunH. I. (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 129–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
LangeK. (1999). Numerical analysis for statisticians. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
10.
LindleyD. V. (1985). Making decisions. Chichester, England: John Wiley.
11.
LongfordN. T. (1995). Models for uncertainty in educational testing. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
12.
LongfordN. T. (2013a). Screening as an application of decision theory. Statistics in Medicine, 32, 849–863.
13.
LongfordN. T. (2013b). Statistical decision theory. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
14.
LongfordN. T.HollandP. W.ThayerD. (1993). Stability of MH D-DIF statistics across populations. In HollandP. W.WainerH. (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 171–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
MantelN.HaenszelW. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of National Cancer Institute, 22, 719–748.
PhillipsA.HollandP. W. (1987). Estimation of the variance of the Mantel-Haenszel log-odds-ratio estimate. Biometrics, 43, 425–431.
18.
SinharayS.DoransN.GrantM. C.BlewE. O. (2009). Using past data to enhance small sample DIF estimation: A Bayesian approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 74–96.
19.
ZwickR.ThayerD. T.LewisC. (2000). Using loss functions for DIF detection: An empirical Bayes approach. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 225–247.
20.
ZwickR.YeL.IshamS. (2012). Improving Mantel-Haenszel DIF estimation through Bayesian updating. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 37, 601–629.
