Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

As the study of fathering has matured in recent years, fathering scholars have recognized the need for richer, broader measures of the construct of father involvement (Hawkins & Palkovitz, 1999). In an effort to create a measure sensitive to affective, cognitive, and direct and indirect behavioral components of involvement, 100 items were initially generated. Of these, 43 were selected for the “Inventory of Father Involvement” (IFI). Fathers (N = 723) reported on “how good a job” they were doing on the 43 indicators of father involvement. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded nine relatively distinct first-order factors, indicating a single, global second-order factor of father involvement. The final model confirms a shorter, 26-item version of the IFI that reflects a multi-dimensional concept of father involvement.

Keywords

father involvement fathering parenting measures

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Daly

K. J.

(2001). Deconstructing family time: From ideology to lived experience. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 283–294.

Doherty

W. J.

Kouneski

E. F.

, & Erickson

M. F.

(1998). Responsible fathering: An overview and conceptual framework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 277–292.

Dollahite

D. C.

, & Hawkins

A. J.

(1998). A conceptual ethic of generative fathering. The Journal of Men's Studies, 7(1), 109–132.

Hawkins

A. J.

, & Palkovitz

(1999). Beyond ticks and clicks: The need for more diverse and broader conceptualizations and measures of father involvement. The Journal of Men's Studies, 8, 11–32.

Hochschild

A. R.

(1997). The time bind. New York: Metropolitan Books.

Lamb

M. E.

(1999). The history of research on father involvement: An overview. In Peters

& Day

R. D.

(Eds.), Fatherhood: Research, interventions, and policies (pp. 23–41). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.

Lamb

M. E.

(1986). The changing role of fathers. In Lamb

M. E.

(Ed.), The father's role: An applied perspective (pp. 3–27). New York: John Wiley.

Lamb

M. E.

Pleck

J. H.

Charnov

E. L.

, & Levine

J. A.

(1987). A biosocial perspective on paternal behavior and involvement. In Lancaster

J. B.

Altmann

Rossi

A. S.

Sherrod

L. R.

(Eds.), Parenting across the lifespan: Biosocial perspectives (pp. 111–142). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.

Marsiglio

Amato

Day

R. D.

, & Lamb

M. E.

(2000). Scholarship on fatherhood in the 1990s and beyond. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1173–1191.

10.

Newport

(1997, March). Americans' relationships with their children: Much remains the same. The Gallup Poll Monthly, 13–17.

11.

Palkovitz

(1997). Reconstructing “involvement”: Expanding conceptualizations of men's caring in contemporary families. In Hawkins

A. J.

& Dollahite

D. C.

(Eds.), Generative fathering: Beyond deficit perspectives (pp. 200–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

12.

Pleck

J. H.

(1997). Paternal involvement: Levels, sources, and consequences. In Lamb

M. E.

(Ed.), The role of the father in child development (3rd ed., pp. 66–103). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

13.

Sabetelli

R. M.

(1988). Measurement issues in marital research: A review and critique of contemporary survey instruments. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 891–915.

14.

Snarey

(1993). How fathers care for the next generation: A four-decade study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.