The central question was, independent of marital status and health, is the satisfaction that older men derive from their social networks linked to gender ideology? Based on the 135 older men within a larger study of community-based older adults, findings show that masculinity ideology is inversely related to the size of networks and the extent of men's social participation; however, endorsing the traditional masculinity ideology is directly associated with the satisfaction men derived from their social participation. Older men who believe in the traditional masculinity script felt satisfied in their relationships, whereas men who reject this ideology and reported a greater need to discuss private feelings had developed larger networks and increased their involvement in their networks during the year between the T1 and T2 interviews. Discussed in the context of covert and face-to-face intimacy pursuits, abiding by the cultural of hegemony masculinity seems to yield less interaction but greater satisfaction among older men.
AntonucciT.C. (1990). Social supports and social relationships. In BinstockR.H. & GeorgeL.K. (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (3rd ed., pp. 205–226). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3.
AshtonW.A., & FuehrerA. (1993). Effects of gender and gender role identification of participant and type of social support resource on support seeking. Sex Roles, 28, 461–476.
4.
AtchleyR. (1989). A continuity theory of normal aging. The Gerontologist, 29, 183–190.
5.
BarreraM. (1980). A method for the assessment of social support in community survey research. Connections, 3, 8–13.
6.
BarreraM. (1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 413–445.
7.
BerkmanL.F. (1995). The role of social relations in health promotion. Psychosomatic Medicine, 57, 245–254.
8.
BleisznerR. (1989). Developmental processes of friendship. In AdamsR.G. & BleisznerR. (Eds.), Older adult friendship (pp. 108–126). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
BoothA. (1972). Sex and social participation. American Sociological Review, 37, 183–192.
10.
BurdaP.C.VauxA., & SchillT. (1984). Social support resources: Variation across sex and sex role. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 119–126.
11.
CarstensenL.L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 331–338.
12.
CarstensenL.L. (1993). Motivation for social contract across the lifespan: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. In JacobsJ. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 209–254). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
13.
ConnellR.W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
ConnellR.W. (2000). The men and the boys. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
DavidD. (1990). Reminiscence, adaptation, and social context in old age. International Aging and Human Development, 30, 175–188.
16.
EkerdtD.J. (1986). The busy ethic: Moral continuity between work and retirement. The Gerontologist, 26, 239–244.
17.
EriksonE.KivnickH.Q., & EriksonJ.M. (1994). Vital involvement in old age: The experience of old age in our time. New York: Norton.
18.
FaludiS. (1999). Stiffed: The betrayal of the American man. New York: William Morrow.
19.
FeskensJ.M. (1997). Age, time, and cohort effects on functional status and self-rated health in elderly men. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1620–1625.
20.
FischerC.B., & OlikerS.J. (1983). A research note on friendship, gender, and the life cycle. Social Forces, 62, 124–133.
21.
FuttermanA.DillonJ.J.GarandF.III, & HaughJ. (1999). Religion as a quest and the search for meaning in later life. In ThomasL.E. & EisenhandlerS.A. (Eds.), Religion, belief, and spirituality in later life (pp. 153–177). New York: Springer.
22.
HeitzmannC.A., & KaplanR.M. (1988). Assessment of methods for measuring social support. Health Psychology, 7, 75–109.
23.
HouseJ.S.LandisK.R., & UmbersonD. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, 540–545.
24.
KahnR.T., & AntonucciT.C. (1981). Conveys of social support: A life-course perspective. In KieslerS.B. (Eds.), Aging: Social change (pp. 383–405). New York: Academic Press.
25.
KeithP.M.HillK.GoudyW.J., & PowersE.A. (1984). Confidants and well-being: A note on male friendship in old age. The Gerontologist, 24, 318–320.
26.
KimmelM.S. (1996). Manhood in America: A cultural history. New York: Free Press.
27.
KosbergJ.I., & KayeL.W. (1997). Elderly men: Special problems and professional challenges. New York: Springer.
28.
KrauseN., & KeithV. (1989). Gender differences in social support among older adults. Sex Roles, 21, 609–628.
29.
LefrancoisR.LeclercG., & PoulinN. (1998). Predictors of activity involvement among older adults. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 22(4), 15–29.
30.
Massachusetts Executive Office of Elder Affairs. (2000). Highlights of the Massachusetts elderly population. Retrieved June 15, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.state.ma.us/elder/
31.
MatthewsS.H. (1994). Men's ties to siblings in old age: Contributing factors to availability and quality. In ThompsonE. (Ed.), Older men's lives (pp. 178–196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL., & CookJ.M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
33.
MorganD.H. (1992). Discovering men: Sociology and masculinities. New York: Routledge.
34.
ReevyG.M., & MaslachC. (2001). Use of social support: Gender and personality differences. Sex Roles, 44, 437–459.
35.
RoweJ.W., & KahnR.L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon Books.
36.
RyffC.D. (1991). Possible selves in adulthood and old age: A tale of shifting horizons. Psychology and Aging, 6, 286–295.
37.
SteuveC.A., & GersonK. (1977). Personal relations across the life-cycle. In FischerC.S.JacksonR.M.SteuveC.A.GersonK.JonesL.M., & BaldassareM. (Eds.), Networks and places (pp. 79–98). New York: Free Press.
38.
StevensN. (1995). Gender and adaptation to widowhood in later life. Ageing and Society, 15, 37–58.
39.
SwainS.O. (1992). Men's friendships with women: Intimacy, sexual boundaries, and the informant role. In NardiP. (Ed.), Men's friendships (pp. 153–171). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
SwainS.O. (1988). Cover intimacy: Closeness in the same-sex friendships of men. In RismanB. & SchwartzP. (Eds.), Gender in intimate relations: A microstructural approach (pp. 71–86). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
41.
ThomasL.E., & ChambersK.O. (1989). Phenomenology of life satisfaction among elderly men: Quantitative and qualitative views. Psychology and Aging, 4, 284–289.
ThompsonE.H., & PleckJ.H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543.
44.
UngerJ.B.JohnsonC.A., & MarksG. (1997). Functional decline in the elderly: Evidence for direct and stress-buffering protective effects of social interaction and physical activity. Annuals of Behavioral Medicine, 19, 152–160.
45.
WellmanB. (1992). Men in networks: Private communities, domestic friendships. In NardiP. (Ed.), Men's friendships (pp. 74–114). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
WellmanB., & WortleyS. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 558–588.
WrightP.H. (1982). Men's friendships, women's friendships, and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8, 1–20.
49.
WrightP.H. (1988). Interpreting research on gender differences in friendship: A case for moderation and a plea for caution. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 367–373.
50.
YoungF.W., & GlasgowN. (1998). Voluntary social participation and health. Research on Aging, 20, 339–362.
