The certainties that characterized modern intimate life, and supported a hegemonic male sexuality defined by action and virility, are less present in contemporary men's intimate lives. In-depth interviews with ten heterosexual and gay men were conducted to explore how they organize their sexual and relational lives in contemporary Australia. Participants were committed to a “late” modern notion of intimacy characterized by reciprocity, and placed emphasis on committed relationships where opportunities to disclose vulnerability and relinquish the burden of responsibility for sexual activity were present. However, casual sex appeared to be ordered by more conventional discourses related to male sexuality. These men reveal the importance of particular definitions of sexual intimacy to a meaningful sense of self in late modernity.
AdamB. (2006). Relationship innovation in male couples. Sexualities, 9(1), 5–26.
2.
AllenL. (2003). Girls want sex, boys want love: Resisting dominant discourses of (hetero)sexuality. Sexualities, 6(2), 215–236.
3.
AllenL. (2007). “Sensitive and real macho at the same time”: Young men and romance. Men and Masculinities, 10(2), 137–152.
4.
AndersonE. (2008). “Being masculine is not about who you sleep with…”: Heterosexual athletes contesting masculinity and the one-time rule of homosexuality. Sex Roles, 58, 104–115
5.
BaumanZ. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
BeckU., & Beck-GernsheimE. (2002). Individualisation: Institutionalised individualism and its social consequences. London: Sage.
7.
BraunV.GaveyN., & McPhillipsK. (2003). The “fair deal”?: Unpacking accounts of reciprocity in heterosex. Sexualities, 6(2), 237–261.
8.
ButeraK.J. (2008). “Neo-mateship” in the 21st century: Changes in the performance of Australian masculinity. Journal of Sociology, 44(3), 265–281.
9.
CancienF.M. (1986). The feminisation of love. Signs, 11 (4), 692–709.
10.
ConnellR.W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
ConnellR.W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
CookJ. (2000). Men's magazines at the Millennium: New spaces, new selves. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 14(2), 171–186.
14.
DowsettG.W. (1993). “I'll show you mine, if you'll show me yours”: Gay men, masculinity research, men's studies, and sex. Theory and Society, 22(5), 697–709.
15.
DuncombeJ., & MarsdenD. (1993). Love and intimacy: The gender division of emotion and “emotion work”—A neglected aspect of sociological discussion of heterosexual relationships. Sociology, 27(2), 221–241.
16.
DworkinS., & O'SullivanL. (2005). Actual versus desired initiation patterns among a sample of college men: Tapping disjunctures within traditional male sexual scripts. The Journal of Sex Research, 42(2), 150–158.
17.
FloodM. (2003). Trust, lust and latex: Why young heterosexual men do not use condoms. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5(4), 353–369.
18.
GagnonJ., & SimonW. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
19.
GiddensA. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Stanford, CA: Standford University Press.
20.
HollwayW. (1984). Women's power in heterosexual sex. Women's Studies International Forum, 7(1), 63–68.
21.
HurleyM. (2003). Then and now. Gay men and HIV. Monograph Series No. 46. The Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health & Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne.
22.
JamiesonL. (1998). Intimacy: Personal relationships in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23.
JamiesonL. (2004). Intimacy, negotiated non-monogamy and the limits of the couple. In DuncombeJ.HarrisonK.AllanG., & MarsdenD. (Eds.), The state of affairs: Explorations in infidelity and commitment (pp. 35–58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
JanszJ. (2000). Masculine identity and restrictive emotionality. In FischerA.H. (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 166–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
JohnsonP. (2004). Haunting heterosexuality: The homo/het binary and intimate love. Sexualities, 7(2), 183–200.
26.
KimmelM.S. (2005). The gender of desire: Essays on male sexuality. New York: State University of New York Press.
27.
KorobovN., & ThorneA. (2006). Intimacy and distancing: Young men's conversations about romantic relationships. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(1), 27–55.
28.
LevantR.F., & BrooksG.R. (1997). Men and sex: New psychological perspectives. New York: Wiley & Sons.
29.
LevantR.F.HallR.J.WilliamsC.M., & HasanN.T. (2009). Gender differences in alexithymia. Psychology of Men and Masculinities, 10(3), 190–203.
30.
MaxwellC. (2007). “Alternative” narratives of young heterosexual experiences in the UK. Sexualities, 10(5), 539–558.
31.
MetzM., & McCarthyM. (2008). Men's sexual health: Fitness for satisfying sex. Routledge: New York.
32.
PatrickS., & BeckenbachJ. (2009). Male perceptions of intimacy: A qualitative study. The Journal of Men's Studies, 17(1), 47–56.
33.
RedmanP. (2001). The discipline of love: Negotiation and regulation of boys' performance of a romance-based heterosexual masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 14(2), 186–200.
34.
RichtersJ., & RisselC. (2005). Doing it down under: The sexual lives of Australians. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
35.
RogersA. (2005). Chaos to control: Men's magazines and the mastering of intimacy. Men and Masculinities, 8(2), 175–194.
36.
RoseneilS. (2000). Queer frameworks and queer tendencies: Towards an understanding of postmodern transformations of sexuality. Sociology Research Online, 5(3). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/3/roseneil.html
37.
RoseneilS. (2007). Queer individualisation: The transformation of personal life in the early 21st century. NORA—Nordic Women's Studies, 15(2/3), 84–99.
38.
RoseneilS., & BudgeonS. (2004). Cultures of intimacy and care beyond “the family”: Personal life and social change in the early 21st century. Current Sociology, 52(2), 135–159.
39.
RubinG. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In VanceC. (Ed.) Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267–319). Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
40.
ScrivnerR. (1997). Gay men and non-relational sex. In LevantR.F. & BrooksG.R. (Eds.) Men and sex: New psychological perspectives (pp. 229–256). New York: John Wily & Sons.
41.
SealD.W., & EhrhardtA. (2003). Masculinity and urban men: Perceived scripts for courtship, romantic, and sexual interactions with women. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 5(4), 295–319.
SingletonA., & MaherJ-M. (2004). The “new man” is in the house: Young men, social change, and housework. Journal of Men's Studies, 12(3), 227–240.
44.
SlavinS. (2009). “Instinctively, I'm just not that sexual a beast”: The complexity of intimacy among Australian gay men. Sexualities, 12(1), 79–96.
45.
TerryG., & BraunV. (2009). “When I was a bastard”: Constructions of maturity in men's accounts of masculinity. Journal of Gender Studies, 18(2), 165–178.
46.
TunariuA.D., & ReaveyP. (2003). Men in love: Living with sexual boredom. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 18(1), 63–94.
47.
Wagner-RaphaelL.SealD.W., & EhrhardtA. (2001). Close emotional relationships with women versus men: A qualitative study of 56 heterosexual men living in an inner-city neighbourhood. Journal of Men's Studies, 9(2), 243–256.
48.
WeeksJ.HeaphyB., & DonovanC. (1999). Partners by choice: Equality, power and commitment in non-heterosexual relationships. In AllenG. (Ed.), The sociology of the family—A reader (pp. 111–126). Oxford: Blackwell.
49.
ZilbergeldB. (1999). The new male sexuality: The truth about men, sex, and pleasure (Rev. Ed.). New York: Bantam Books.
