While several studies have examined the relationship between hegemonic masculinity and criminality, prior research has not explored correctional interventions that respond to the pernicious effects of hypermasculinity in prison. This article reports the findings of an exploratory, qualitative study of two related men's programs at prisons in Massachusetts and California. The study included participant observation and interviews with program volunteers. The article describes how the programs seek to deconstruct hypermasculinity in the prison setting and help inmates redefine masculinity to produce prosocial outcomes. The programs are offshoots of a large, voluntary organization called the ManKind Project. Drawing on the philosophy of the “mythopoetic men's movement” as well as popular personal growth and therapeutic techniques, the program seeks to offer inmates the opportunity to explore their conceptions of masculinity and redefine them in ways that will serve them both in prison and upon reintegration into society.
AkersR.L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
2.
BandyopadhyayM. (2006). Competing masculinities in a prison. Men and Masculinities, 9, 186–203.
3.
BartonE.R. (Ed.). (2000). Mythopoetic perspectives on men's healing work: An anthology for therapists and others. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
4.
BlissS. (1995). Mythopoetic men's movements. In KimmelM.S. (Ed.), The politics of manhood: Profeminist men respond to the mythopoetic men's movement (and the mythopoetic leaders answer) (pp. 292–307). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
5.
BlyR. (1990). Iron John. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
BraithwaiteJ. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CarceralK.C. (2004). Behind a convict's eyes: Doing time in a modern prison. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8.
ClarkeR.V., & FelsonM. (Eds.). (1993). Routine activity and rational choice: Advances in criminological theory (Volume 5). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.
9.
ConnellR.W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
ConnellR.W. (1995). Masculinities. Los Angeles: University of California.
CullenF.T., & GendreauP. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In HorneyJ. (Ed.), Policies, processes and decisions in the criminal justice system (pp. 109–176). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
13.
GibbsJ.T., & MerighiJ.R. (1994). Young black males: Marginality, masculinity, and criminality. In NewburnT. & StankoE. (Eds.), Just boys doing business? Men, masculinities, and crime (pp. 64–80). London: Routledge.
14.
GoffmanE. (1961). Asylums. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
15.
HirschiT., & GottfredsonM.J. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
16.
Inside Circle Foundation. (2009). [cited April 4, 2009.] Available from http://insidecircle.org.
JewkesY. (2005). Men behind bars: “Doing masculinity” as an adaptation to imprisonment. Men and Masculinities, 8, 44–63.
19.
KeenS. (1991). Fire in the belly: On being a man. New York: Bantam.
20.
KimmelM.S. (Ed.). (1995). The politics of manhood: Profeminist men respond to the mythopoetic men's movement (and the mythopoetic leaders answer). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
21.
LefkowitzE.S., & ZeldowP.B. (2006). Masculinity and femininity predict optimal mental health: A belated test of the androgyny hypothesis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 95–101.
22.
LiebmanW. (1991). Tending the fire: The ritual men's group. St. Paul, MN: Ally Press.
MaguireK., & PastoreA.L. (Eds.). (2009a). Arrests by offense charged, sex, and age group, United States, 2005 and 2006 (Table 4.9.2006). Available from http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook [4/4/2009]
25.
MaguireK., & PastoreA.L. (Eds.). (2009b). Number and rate (per 100,000 resident population in each group) of sentenced prisoners under jurisdiction of state and federal correctional authorities on December 31 (Table 6.28.2006). Available from http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook [4/4/2009]
26.
MaguireK., & PastoreA.L. (Eds.). (2009c). Hispanic and female prisoners under sentence of death (Table 6.83.2006). Available from http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook [4/4/2009]
27.
MaguireK., & PastoreA.L. (Eds.). (2009d). Prisoners under sentence of death, by race, ethnicity, and jurisdiction, on July 1, 2006 (Table 6.80.2006). Available from http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook [4/4/2009]
MankowskiE.S.MatonK.L.BurkeC.K.HooverS.A., & AndersonC.W. (2000). Collaborative research with a men's organization: Psychological, impact, functioning, and organizational growth. In BartonE.R. (Ed.), Mythopoetic perspectives of men's healing work: An anthology for therapists and others (pp. 184–203). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
30.
MankowskiE.S., & SilvergleidC.S. (1999–2000). A review of self-help and mutual support groups for men. International Journal of Self Help and Self Care, 1, 281–299.
31.
MasseyD.S., & DentonN.A. (1993). American apartheid. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
32.
MeadeM.J. (1993). Men and the water of life: Initation and the tempering of men. San Francisco: Harper Collins.
33.
MesserschmidtJ.W. (1993). Masculinities and crime: Critique and reconceptualization of theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
34.
MessnerM.A. (1997). Politics of masculinities: Men in movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
MessnerS.F., & RosenfeldR. (2001). Crime and the American dream (3rd. ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
36.
MooreR., & GilletteD. (1990). King, warrior, magician, lover: Rediscovering the archetypes of the mature masculine. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
37.
MorenoJ.L. (1953). Who shall survive? Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy and psychodrama. Beacon, NY: Beacon House.
38.
MosherD.L. (1991). Macho men, machismo, and sexuality. Annual Review of Sex Research, 2, 199–247.
39.
NaginD.S., & PogarskyG. (2003). An experimental investigation of deterrence: Cheating, self-serving bias, and impulsivity. Criminology, 41, 167–191.
40.
PetersiliaJ. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
PhillipsJ. (2001). Cultural construction of manhood in prison. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 2, 13–23.
42.
SaboD.F. (2001). Doing time, doing masculinity: Sports in prison. In SaboD.F.KupersT.A., & LondonW. (Eds.), Prison masculinities (pp. 61–66). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
SampsonR.J., & LaubJ. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge: Harvard University.
45.
SampsonR.J., & WilsonW.J. (1998). Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In KarpD.R. (Ed.), Community justice: An emerging field (pp. 97–118). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
46.
ScarceJ.R. (2002). Doing time as an art of survival. Symbolic Interaction, 25, 303–321.
47.
SchwalbeM. (1996). Unlocking the iron cage: The men's movement, gender politics, and American culture. New York: Oxford.
48.
SteffensmeierD.SchwartzJ.ZhongH., & AckermanJ. (2005). An assessment of recent trends in girls' violence using diverse longitudinal sources: Is the gender gap closing?Criminology, 43, 355–406.
49.
TochH. (1998). Hypermasculinity and prison violence. In BowkerL.H. (Ed.), Masculinities and violence (pp. 168–178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
WellfordC.F., & TriplettR.A. (1993). The future of labeling theory: Foundations and promises. In AdlerF. & LauferW.S. (Eds.), New directions in criminological theory (pp. 1–22). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
