Abstract
This article examines contemporary male ethicists' search for a revised masculine ethic by surveying three stages of the Men's Movement—the Feminist-Friendly, Mythopoetic, and Moderate Men's Movements. These first two movements created an ideological and political gulf that blunted their social and political efficacy and undermined this search. The third, however, minded these missteps by chartering a course of moderation and balance and so the Moderate Men's Movement succeeded by offering men what its predecessors could not—namely a more suitable and appealing way of being male in the world today.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
