Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Recommender Systems aim to provide users with search results close to their needs, making predictions of their preferences. In virtual learning environments, Educational Recommender Systems deliver learning objects according to the student’s characteristics, preferences and learning needs. A learning object is an educational content unit, which once found and retrieved may assist students in their learning process. In previous work, authors have designed and evaluated several recommendation techniques for delivering the most appropriate learning object for each specific student. Also, they have combined these techniques by using hybridization methods, improving the performance of isolated techniques. However, traditional hybridization methods fail when the learning objects delivered by each recommendation technique are very different from those selected by the other techniques (there is no agreement about the best learning object to recommend). In this paper, we present a new recommendation method based on argumentation theory that is able to combine content-based, collaborative and knowledge-based recommendation techniques, or to act as a new recommendation technique. This method provides the students with those objects for which the system is able to generate more arguments to justify their suitability. It has been implemented and tested in the Federation of Learning Objects Repositories of Colombia, getting promising results.

Keywords

Educational recommender systems argumentation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

C.E.

Briguez,

Budán,

Deagustini,

A.G.

Maguitman,

Capobianco and

G.R.

Simari, Towards an argument-based music recommender system, COMMA 245 (2012), 83–90.

C.E.

Briguez,

Budán,

Deagustini,

A.G.

Maguitman,

Capobianco and

G.R.

Simari, Argument-based mixed recommenders and their application to movie suggestion, Expert Systems With Applications 41(14) (2014), 6467–6482. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.046.

C.E.

Briguez,

Capobianco and

A.G.

Maguitman, A theoretical framework for trust-based news recommender systems and its implementation using defeasible argumentation, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 22(04) (2013), 1350021. doi:10.1142/S0218213013500218.

Burke, Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments, User Modelingand User-Adapted Interaction (2002).

C.I.

Chesñevar,

A.G.

Maguitman and

M.P.

González, Empowering recommendation technologies through argumentation, in: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, 2009, pp. 403–422. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_20.

Drachsler,

Verbert,

O.C.

Santos and

Manouselis, Panorama of recommender systems to support learning, in: Recommender Systems Handbook, 2015, pp. 421–451. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_12.

N.D.

Duque,

D.A.

Ovalle and

Moreno, Objetos de aprendizaje, repositorios y federaciones... conocimiento para todos. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2015.

Dwivedi and

K.K.

Bharadwaj, e-Learning recommender system for a group of learners based on the unified learner profile approach, Expert Systems 32(2) (2015), 264–276. doi:10.1111/exsy.12061.

A.J.

García and

G.R.

Simari, Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 4(1–2) (2004), 95–138. doi:10.1017/S1471068403001674.

10.

Gunawardana and

Shani, Evaluating recommender systems, in: Recommender Systems Handbook, Springer, 2015, pp. 265–308. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_8.

11.

Heras,

Botti and

Julián, Argument-based agreements in agent societies, Neurocomputing 75(1) (2012), 156–162. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2011.02.022.

12.

Heras,

Rebollo and

Julián, A dialogue game protocol for recommendation in social networks, in: Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems, Springer, 2008, pp. 515–522. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87656-4_64.

13.

P.A.

Kirschner,

S.J.

Buckingham-Shum and

C.S.

Carr, Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.

14.

Klašnja-Milićević,

Ivanović and

Nanopoulos, Recommender systems in e-learning environments: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions, Artificial Intelligence Review 44(4) (2015), 571–604. doi:10.1007/s10462-015-9440-z.

15.

Learning Technology Standards Committee, IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 2002.

16.

W.L.

Leite,

Svinicki and

Shi, Attempted validation of the scores of the vark: Learning styles inventory with multitrait-multimethod confirmatory factor analysis models, Educational and Psychological Measurement 70(2) (2010), 323–339. doi:10.1177/0013164409344507.

17.

Li,

Oren and

T.J.

Norman, Probabilistic argumentation frameworks, in: Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation, Springer, 2012, pp. 1–16. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_1.

18.

Linden,

Hong,

Stonebraker and

Guzdial, Recommendation algorithms, online privacy, and more, Communications of the ACM 52(5) (2009), 10–11. doi:10.1145/1506409.1506434.

19.

Manouselis,

Drachsler,

Vourikari,

Hummel and

Koper, Recommender systems in technology enhanced learning, Recommender Systems Handbook 54 (2011), 479–510.

20.

Ossowski,

Sierra and

Botti, Agreement technologies: A computing perspective, in: Agreement Technologies, Springer, 2013, pp. 3–16. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_1.

21.

Palanca,

Heras,

Jorge and

Julian, Towards persuasive social recommendation: Knowledge model, SIGAPP Appl. Comput. Rev. 15(2) (2015), 41–49. doi:10.1145/2815169.2815173.

22.

J.A.

Recio-García,

Quijano and

Díaz-Agudo, Including social factors in an argumentative model for group decision support systems, Decision Support Systems 56 (2013), 48–55. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.007.

23.

P.A.

Rodríguez,

N.D.

Duque and

D.A.

Ovalle, Multi-agent system for knowledge-based recommendation of learning objects using metadata clustering, in: Highlights of Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Sustainability-The PAAMS Collection, Springer, 2015, pp. 356–364. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19033-4_31.

24.

P.A.

Rodríguez,

D.A.

Ovalle and

N.D.

Duque, A student-centered hybrid recommender system to provide relevant learning objects from repositories, in: Learning and Collaboration Technologies,

Zaphiris and

Ioannou, eds, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9192, Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 291–300. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20609-7_28.

25.

P.A.

Rodríguez-Marín,

N.D.

Duque-Méndez and

D.A.

Ovalle, Modelo de recomendación adaptativa de objetos de aprendizaje en el marco de una federación de repositorios, apoyado en agentes inteligentes y perfiles de usuario – Tesis de Maestría, PhD thesis, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Medellín, 2013.

26.

Salehi,

Pourzaferani and

S.A.

Razavi, Hybrid attribute-based recommender system for learning material using genetic algorithm and a multidimensional information model, Egyptian Informatics Journal (2013).

27.

Sikka,

Dhankhar and

Rana, A survey paper on E-learning recommender system, International Journal of Computer Applications 47(9) (2012), 27–30. doi:10.5120/7218-0024.

28.

Sinha and

Swearingen, The role of transparency in recommender systems, in: CHI’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2002, pp. 830–831. doi:10.1145/506443.506619.

29.

Van de Sompel,

Chute and

Hochstenbach, The adore federation architecture: Digital repositories at scale, International Journal on Digital Libraries 9(2) (2008), 83–100. doi:10.1007/s00799-008-0048-7.

30.

Vekariya and

G.R.

Kulkarni, Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments, in: 2012 Second International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and It’s Applications (DICTAP), IEEE, 2012, pp. 469–473. doi:10.1109/DICTAP.2012.6215409.

31.

Zapata,

V.H.

Menendez,

M.E.

Prieto and

Romero, A hybrid recommender method for learning objects, IJCA Proceedings on Design and Evaluation of Digital Content for Education (DEDCE) 1 (2011), 1–7.