Using the Conway model of data science education as a guide, this paper introduces a model for undergraduate data science education for information schools. The core idea of the suggested model is that data science programs in information schools are unique due to their particular substantive expertise, which includes data management, information behavior, and ethics. This paper also suggests that, to create a data science program within an information school, it may be useful to expand curriculums by adding programming, statistics, and machine learning requirements.
AultM. R. (1987). Combating the Garbage-In, Gospel-Out Syndrome. Radiation Protection Management. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268357767_Combating_the_Garbage-In_Gospel-Out_Syndrome.
2.
ConwayD. (2019). The Data Science Venn Diagram. Drew Conway. http://drewconway.com/zia/2013/3/26/the-data-science-venn-diagram.
3.
De VeauxR. D.AgarwalM.AverettM.BaumerB. S.BrayA.BressoudT. C.BryantL.ChengL. Z.FrancisA.GouldR.KimA. Y.KretchmarM.LuQ.MoskolA.NolanD.PelayoR.RaleighS.SethiR. J.SondjajaM., et al. (2017). Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Programs in Data Science. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4(1), 15-30. 10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-053930.
4.
DharV. (2013). Data science and prediction. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 64-73. 10.1145/2500499.
5.
GrimesD. A. (2010). Epidemiologic Research Using Administrative Databases: Garbage In, Garbage Out. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 116(5), 1018-1019. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f98300.
6.
JanssenM.Voort van derH., & WahyudiA. (2017). Factors influencing big data decision-making quality. Journal of Business Research, 70, 338-345. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.007.
7.
MichenerW. K. (2018a). 5. Creating and Managing Metadata. In RecknagelF. & MichenerW. K. (Eds.), Ecological Informatics: Data Management and Knowledge Discovery (pp. 71-88). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-59928-1_5.
8.
MichenerW. K. (2018b). 7. Data Discovery. In RecknagelF. & MichenerW. K. (Eds.), Ecological Informatics: Data Management and Knowledge Discovery (pp. 115-128). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-59928-1_7.
9.
MichenerW. K., & JonesM. B. (2012). Ecoinformatics: Supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(2), 85-93. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.016.
10.
RubinE. (2015). Foundations of Library and Information Science: Fourth Edition. American Library Association. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/usf/detail.action?docID=5185108.
11.
Stanford Data Science Initiative. (2019). Data Science for Humanity. Stanford University. https://sdsi.stanford.edu/about/data-science-humanity.
12.
StrasserC.CookR.MichenerW., & BuddenA. (n.d.). Primer on Data Management: What you always wanted to know. 11.
13.
StrongD. M.LeeY. W., & WangR. Y. (1997). Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM, 40(5), 103-110.
14.
SunT. Q., & MedagliaR. (2019). Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 368-383. 10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008.
