Cognitive architectures allow robots to perform their operations by drawing on a process that aims to simulate human reasoning. This paper presents an integrated semantic artificial memory system in cognitive architecture based on symbolic reasoning and a connective representation of the knowledge. This memory system attempts to simulate how humans learn to distinguish instances of particular objects within their class using a convolutional network to detect the relevant elements of an image. We use a vector with the extracted features to learn to discriminate an instance of another element from the same class. A novel feature of our approach is its autonomous learning process during the operation of the robot, integrating a deep learning embedding with a statistical classifier. The usefulness and robustness of this method are demonstrated by applying it to a social robot that learns to differentiate people. Finally, experiments are carried out to validate our approach, comparing the detection results with several alternative methods.
KrauseJStarkMDengJFei-FeiL. 3D Object Representations for Fine-Grained Categorization. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops. ICCVW ’13. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society; 2013. p. 554-561. Available from: 10.1109/ICCVW.2013.77.
2.
CharalampousKGasteratosA. On-line deep learning method for action recognition. Pattern Analysis and Applications. 2016; 19(2): 337-354.
3.
BaeSHYoonKJ. Robust online multi-object tracking based on tracklet confidence and online discriminative appearance learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2014, p. 1218-1225.
4.
LiMShenFWangJGuanCTangJ. Person re-identification with activity prediction based on hierarchical spatial-temporal model. Neurocomputing. 2018; 275: 1200-1207. Available from: http//www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231217315837.
5.
Martin-RicoFGomez-DonosoFEscalonaFCazorlaMGarcia-RodriguezJ. Artificial Semantic Memory with Autonomous Learning Applied to Social Robots. In: Ferrández VicenteJMÁlvarez-SánchezJRde la Paz LópezFToledo MoreoJAdeliH, editors. From Bioinspired Systems and Biomedical Applications to Machine Learning. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 401-411.
6.
CoradeschiSSaffiottiA. An introduction to the anchoring problem. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 2003; 43(2): 85-96. Perceptual Anchoring: Anchoring Symbols to Sensor Data in Single and Multiple Robot Systems. Available from: http//www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921889003000216.
7.
TenorthMBeetzM. Representations for robot knowledge in the KnowRob framework. Artificial Intelligence. 2017; 247: 151-169. Special Issue on AI and Robotics. Available from: http//www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370215000843.
8.
OliveiraMLimGHLopesLSKasaeiSHToméAMChauhanA. A perceptual memory system for grounding semantic representations in intelligent service robots. In: 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2014, pp. 2216-2223.
9.
DoddWGutierrezR. The role of episodic memory and emotion in a cognitive robot. In: ROMAN 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005, pp. 692-697.
10.
HoWCDautenhahnKLimMYVargasPAAylettREnzS. An initial memory model for virtual and robot companions supporting migration and long-term interaction. In: RO-MAN 2009 – The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2009, pp. 277-284.
11.
StachowiczDKruijffGM. Episodic-Like Memory for Cognitive Robots. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development. 2012 March; 4(1): 1-16.
12.
DuroRJBecerraJAMonroyJBellasF. Perceptual Generalization and Context in a Network Memory Inspired Long-Term Memory for Artificial Cognition. International Journal of Neural Systems. 2019; 29(6): 1850053. PMID: 30614325. Available from: 10.1142/S0129065718500533.
13.
PhillipsJLNoelleDC. Biologically Inspired Working Memory Framework for Robots. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2005, pp. 1237-1383.
14.
SkubicMNoelleDWilkesMKawamuraKMKellerJ. A biologically inspired adaptive working memory for robots, 2004; 1, pp. 1-8.
15.
GongSCristaniMYanSLoyCC. Person Re-Identification. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2014.
16.
LaviBSerjMFUllahI. Survey on Deep Learning Techniques for Person Re-Identification Task. CoRR. 2018abs/1807.05284, Available from: http//arxiv.org/abs/1807.05284.
17.
YuRDouZBaiSZhangZXuYBaiX. Hard-Aware Point-to-Set Deep Metric for Person Re-identification. In: FerrariVHebertMSminchisescuCWeissY, editors. Computer Vision – ECCV 2018, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 196-212.
18.
WangCZhangQHuangCLiuWWangX. Mancs: A Multi-task Attentional Network with Curriculum Sampling for Person Re-Identification, In: ECCV, 2018.
19.
QianXFuYXiangTJiangYXueX. Leader-based Multi-Scale Attention Deep Architecture for Person Re-identification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2019, p. 1.
20.
GrayDTaoH. Viewpoint Invariant Pedestrian Recognition with an Ensemble of Localized Features. In: ForsythDTorrPZissermanA, editors. Computer Vision – ECCV 2008, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008. pp. 262-275.
21.
ZhengLShenLTianLWangSWangJTianQ. Scalable Person Re-identification: A Benchmark, In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2015, pp. 1116-1124.
22.
LiWZhaoRXiaoTWangX. DeepReID: Deep Filter Pairing Neural Network for Person Re-identification. In: CVPR. IEEE Computer Society, 2014, pp. 152-159.
23.
ZhengZZhengLYangY. Unlabeled Samples Generated by GAN Improve the Person Re-identification Baseline in vitro. CoRR. 2017abs/1701.07717.
24.
ZhengLBieZSunYWangJSuCWangS, et al. MARS: A Video Benchmark for Large-Scale Person Re-identification; 2016. Available from: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/mars-video-benchmark-large-scale-person-re-identification/.
25.
WangTGongSZhuXWangS. Person Re-identification by Video Ranking. In: Fleet DPajdlaTSchieleBTuytelaarsT, editors. Computer Vision – ECCV 2014. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2014, pp. 688-703.
26.
HirzerMBeleznaiCRothPMBischofH. Person Re-identification by Descriptive and Discriminative Classification. In: HeydenAKahlF, editors. Image Analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 91-102.
27.
AhmedEJonesMJMarksTK. An improved deep learning architecture for person re-identification. In: CVPR. IEEE Computer Society, 2015, pp. 3908-3916. Available from: http//dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/cvpr/cvpr2015.html#AhmedJM15.
28.
ChenYZhuXGongS. Person Re-identification by Deep Learning Multi-scale Representations. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCV Workshops 2017, Venice, Italy, 22–29 October 2017, pp. 2590-2600. Available from: 10.1109/ICCVW.2017.304.
29.
LiMZhuXGongS. Unsupervised Person Re-identification by Deep Learning Tracklet Association. In: FerrariVHebertMSminchisescuCWeissY, editors. Computer Vision – ECCV 2018, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 772-788.
30.
ShenYLiHYiSChenDWangX. Person Re-identification with Deep Similarity-Guided Graph Neural Network. In: ECCV (15) vol. 11219 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 2018. pp. 508-526.
31.
WangKWangHLiuMXingX. Survey on Person Re-identification Based on Deep Learning. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology, 2018, 6.
32.
KochGZemelRSalakhutdinovR. Siamese Neural Networks for One-shot Image Recognition, 2015.
33.
AhmedEJonesMMarksTK. An improved deep learning architecture for person re-identification. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2015, pp. 3908-3916. Available from: 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299016.
34.
LiuWAnguelovDErhanDSzegedyCReedSFuCY, et al. SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector. Lecture Notes in Computer Science2016, pp. 21-37. Available from: 10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2.
35.
Rodríguez-LeraFJMatellán-OliveraVConde-GonzálezMÁMartín-RicoF. HiMoP: A three-component architecture to create more human-acceptable social-assistive robots. Cognitive Processing. 2018 May; 19(2): 233-244. Available from: 10.1007/s10339-017-0850-5.
36.
Martín-RicoFGinésJVargasDRodríguez-LeraFJMatellán-OliveraV. Planning-Centered Architecture for RoboCup SSPL @Home. In: Fuentetaja PizánRGarcía OlayaÁSesmero LorenteMPIglesias MartínezJALedezma EspinoA, editors. Advances in Physical Agents. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 287-302.
37.
AgüeroCECanasJMMartınFPerdicesE. Behavior-based iterative component architecture for soccer applications with the nao humanoid. In: 5th Workshop on Humanoids Soccer Robots. Nashville, TN, USA. vol. 127, 2010.
38.
McDermottDGhallabMHoweAKnoblockCRamAVelosoM, et al., PDDL-the planning domain definition language. Technical Report CVC TR-98-003/DCS TR-1165, Yale Center for Computational, 1998.
39.
RedmonJFarhadiA. YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement. arXiv. 2018.
40.
HeKZhangXRenSSunJ. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. CoRR. 2015abs/1512.03385. Available from: http//arxiv.org/abs/1512.03385.
KomerBBergstraJEliasmithC. Hyperopt-sklearn: automatic hyperparameter configuration for scikit-learn. In: ICML workshop on AutoML. vol. 9, Citeseer, 2014.
43.
Robocup. RoboCup@Home 2019; 2019 (accessed October 24, 2019). Available from: https//athome.robocup.org/wp-content/uploads/Rulebook2019GermanOpen.pdf.
44.
LinTMaireMBelongieSJBourdevLDGirshickRBHaysJ, et al. Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context. CoRR. 2014abs/1405.0312, Available from: http//arxiv.org/abs/1405.0312.
45.
SimonyanKZissermanA. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition, CoRR. 2014abs/ 1409.1556.
46.
SandlerMHowardAZhuMZhmoginovAChenLC. MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks, 2018.
47.
DengJDongWSocherRLiLJLiKFei-FeiL. ImageNet: A Large-Scale Hierarchical Image Database. In: CVPR09, 2009.
48.
GaglioSReGLMoranaM. Human Activity Recognition Process Using 3-D Posture Data. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems. 2015 Oct; 45(5): 586-597.
49.
KriegelHPSchubertMZimekA. Angle-based outlier detection in high-dimensional data. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM, 2008, pp. 444-452.
GoldsteinMDengelA. Histogram-based outlier score (hbos): A fast unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm. KI-2012 Poster and Demo Track. 2012, pp. 59-63.
52.
LiuFTTingKMZhouZH. Isolation forest. In: 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 2008, pp. 413-422.
53.
BreunigMMKriegelHPNgRTSanderJ. LOF: identifying density-based local outliers. In: ACM sigmod record. vol. 29, ACM, 2000, pp. 93-104.
54.
RousseeuwPJDriessenKV. A fast algorithm for the minimum covariance determinant estimator. Technometrics. 1999; 41(3): 212-223.
55.
ChenYZhouXSHuangTS. One-class SVM for learning in image retrieval. In: ICIP (1), Citeseer, 2001, pp. 34-37.
56.
WoldSEsbensenKGeladiP. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 1987; 2(1-3): 37-52.
57.
JanssensJHuszárFPostmaEvan den HerikH. Stochastic outlier selection. tech rep, 2012.
58.
RafieiMHAdeliH. A New Neural Dynamic Classification Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. 2017 Dec; 28(12): 3074-3083.
59.
AhmadlouMAdeliH. Enhanced Probabilistic Neural Network with Local Decision Circles: A Robust Classifier. Integr Comput-Aided Eng. 2010 Aug; 17(3): 197-210.
