Personal information management enables users to manage and classify information via the social tagging. The personal information management platform has recently successfully adopted social networks, enabling users to conveniently share their preferences of information with each other. The emerging social networks generate new concepts for designing modern recommender systems in personal information management and sharing platforms.
To design a recommender mechanism for the personal information management and sharing platforms, this work incorporates tag-based personalized interest and social network relationships into a modified Bayesian probability model.
The proposed system is demonstrated with experimental datasets obtained from a popular social resource sharing website. The performances of the proposed system are evaluated based on the word2vec word embedding model. Experimental results indicate that incorporating social network information and personalized tag-based preference with the Bayesian model can improve the recommendation quality for social information sharing websites.
AdamopoulosP. and TuzhilinA., On unexpectedness in recommender systems: Or how to better expect the unexpected, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Special Section on Novelty and Diversity in Recommender Systems4(5) (2015): 54.
2.
AdomaviciusG. and TuzhilinA., Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering17(6) (2005), 734–749.
3.
BalabanovicM. and ShohamY., Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation, Communications of the ACM40(3) (1997), 66–72.
4.
BojanowskiP.GraveE.JoulinA. and MikolovT., Enriching word vectors with subword information, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics5 (2017), 135–146.
5.
BrooksC.H. and MontanezN., An analysis of the effectiveness of tagging in blogs, in: AAAI Spring Symposium: Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs, Vol. 6, 2006, pp. 9–14.
6.
ChenJ.LiuY.YangG. and ZouM., Inferring tag co-occurrence relationship across heterogeneous social networks, Applied Soft Computing, 66 (2018), 512–524.
7.
ChenL.WuW. and HeL., Personality and recommendation diversity, in: Emotions and Personality in Personalized Services, Springer International Publishing, 2016, pp. 201–225.
8.
DalkirK., Knowledge Management In Theory and Practice, Boston: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005.
9.
GemmellJ.SchimolerT.MobasherB. and BurkeR., Tag-based resource recommendation in social annotation applications, in: User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, Girona, Spain, 2011.
10.
GolderS.A. and HubermanB.A., The structure of collaborative tagging systems, Journal of Information Science32 (2006), 198–208.
11.
GrundspenkisJ., Agent based approach for organization and personal knowledge modelling: knowledge management perspective, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing18(4) (2007), 451–457.
12.
HuangC.-L.YehP.-H.LinC.-W. and WuD.-C., Utilizing user tag-based interests in recommender systems for social resource sharing websites, Knowledge-Based Systems56(2) (2014), 86–96.
13.
JäschkeR.HothoA.SchmitzC.GanterB. and StummeG., Discovering shared conceptualizations in folksonomies, Journal of Web Semantics6(1) (2008), 38–53.
14.
JiK. and ShenH., Addressing cold-start: Scalable recommendation with tags and keywords, Knowledge-Based Systems83 (2015), 42–50.
15.
JoulinA.GraveE.BojanowskiP. and MikolovT., Bag of tricks for efficient text classification, in: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vol. 2, pp. 427–431.
16.
KimH.-N.JiA.-T.HaI. and JoG.-S., Collaborative filtering based on collaborative tagging for enhancing the quality of recommendation, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications9(1) (2010), 73–83.
17.
LamereP., Social tagging and music information retrieval, Journal of New Music Research37(2) (2008), 101–114.
18.
LeQ. and MikolovT., Distributed representations of sentences and documents, in: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-14), 2014, pp. 1188–1196.
19.
LikaB.KolomvatsosK. and HadjiefthymiadesS., Facing the cold start problem in recommender systems, Expert Systems with Applications41(4) (2014), 2065–2073.
20.
MaH.JiaM.ZhangD. and LinX., Combining tag correlation and user social relation for microblog recommendation, Information Sciences385 (2017), 325–337.
21.
MarlowC.NaamanM.BoydD. and DavisM., HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, to read, in: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, 2006, pp. 31–40.
22.
MezghaniM.PéninouA.ZayaniC.A.AmousI. and SèdesF., Producing relevant interests from social networks by mining users’ tagging behaviour: A first step towards adapting social information, Data & Knowledge Engineering108 (2017), 15–29.
23.
MikolovT.ChenK.CorradoG. and DeanJ., Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space, arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781v3, 2013.
24.
MikolovT.SutskeverI.ChenK.CorradoG. and DeanJ., Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2013, pp. 3111–3119.
25.
MorrisonP.J., Tagging and searching: Search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web, Information Processing & Management44(4) (2008), 1562–1579.
26.
PereiraA.L.V. and HruschkaE.R., Simultaneous co-clustering and learning to address the cold start problem in recommender systems, Knowledge-Based Systems82 (2015), 11–19.
27.
PouliV.BarasJ.S. and ArvanitisA., Increasing recommendation accuracy and diversity via social networks hyperbolic embedding, in: IEEE 11𝑡ℎ Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2014, pp. 225–232.
28.
RashidA.M.AlbertI.CosleyD.LamS.K. and KonstaS.M., Getting to know you: Learning new user preferences in recommender systems, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2002, pp. 127–134.
29.
SonL.H., Dealing with the new user cold-start problem in recommender systems: A comparative review, Information Systems58 (2016), 87–104.
30.
WeiK.HuangJ. and FuS., A survey of e-commerce recommender systems, in: IEEE International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, 2007, pp. 1–5.
31.
WetherbeJ.C.TurbanE.LeidnerD.E. and McLeanE.R., Information technology for management: Transforming organizations in the digital economy, New York: Wiley. ISBN 0-471-78712-4, 2007.
32.
WuP. and ZhangZ.K., Enhancing personalized recommendations on weighted social tagging networks, Physics Procedia3(5) (2010), 1877–1885.
33.
ZanardiV. and CapraL., A scalable tag-based recommender system for new users of the social web, in: 22nd International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Toulouse, France, 2011.
34.
ZanardiV. and CapraL., Social ranking: Uncovering relevant content using tag-based recommender systems, in: 2nd ACM International Conference on Recommender Systems, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2008, pp. 51–58.
35.
ZhangS.YaoL. and SunA., Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives, arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.07435, 2017.
36.
ZhangY.ZhangB.GaoK.GuoP. and SunD., Combining content and relation analysis for recommendation in social tagging systems, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications391(22) (2012), 5759–5768.
