This paper presents a wholly analytical method which combines electromagnetic and ultrasonic simulations for the study of an Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer Array (EMAT). Analytical solutions to the eddy current problem for the meander coil used in an EMAT are adapted from the classic Deeds and Dodd solution, which was originally intended for circular coils. The analytical solution resulting from this novel adaptation exploits the large radius extrapolation and shows several advantages over the finite element method (FEM), especially in the higher frequency regime. The calculated Lorentz force density from the EM solver is then coupled to the ultrasonic simulations, which exploit an analytical solution for generating the distribution of surface waves. Beam features are studied, which can produce performance parameters for an EMAT array, facilitating the optimum design of such sensors. This total analytical approach to an EMAT simulation has not been reported previously to our knowledge.
CacciolaM. et al., Fuzzy characterization of flawed metallic plates with eddy current tests, Progress In Electromagnetics Research72 (2007), 241-252.
2.
LovejoyD., Magnetic Particle Inspection: A Practical Guide. 1993: Springer.
3.
MahmoudiM. and TanS.Y., Depth detection of conducting marine mines via eddy-current and current-channeling response, Progress In Electromagnetics Research90 (2009), 287-307.
4.
ParkM.H., KimI.S. and YoonY.K., Ultrasonic inspection of long steel pipes using Lamb waves, NDT & E International29(1) (1996), 13-20.
5.
YinW. and PeytonA., Thickness measurement of non-magnetic plates using multi-frequency eddy current sensors, NDT & E International40(1) (2007), 43-48.
6.
YinW. and PeytonA.J., Thickness measurement of metallic plates with an electromagnetic sensor using phase signature analysis, Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on57(8) (2008), 1803-1807.
7.
ZhaoQ., HaoJ. and YinW., A simulation study of flaw detection for rail sections based on high frequency magnetic induction sensing using the boundary element method, Progress In Electromagnetics Research141 (2013), 309-325.
8.
CawleyP., Ultrasonic measurements for the quantitative NDE of adhesive joints-potential and challenges. in Ultrasonics Symposium, 1992. Proceedings., IEEE 1992. 1992. IEEE.
9.
ChassignoleB. et al., Characterization of austenitic stainless steel welds for ultrasonic NDT. in REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION: Volume 19. 2000. AIP Publishing.
10.
DrinkwaterB. and CawleyP., Measurement of the frequency dependence of the ultrasonic reflection coefficient from thin interface layers and partially contacting interfaces, Ultrasonics35(7) (1997), 479-488.
11.
DrinkwaterB.W. and WilcoxP.D., Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: A review, NDT & E International39(7) (2006), 525-541.
12.
Gallego-JuarezJ., Piezoelectric ceramics and ultrasonic transducers, Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments22(10) (1989), 804.
13.
JaffeH. and BerlincourtD., Piezoelectric transducer materials, Proceedings of the IEEE53(10) (1965), 1372-1386.
CaratelliD., Lay-EkuakilleA. and VergalloP., Non-Invasive Reflectometry-Based Detection of Melanoma by Piezoelectric Micro-Needle Antenna Sensors, Progress In Electromagnetics Research135 (2013), 91-103.
16.
RibichiniR., MODELLING OF ELECTROMAGNETIC ACOUSTIC TRANSDUCERS (Ph.D. Dissertation), 2011, Imperial College London.
17.
DhayalanR. and BalasubramaniamK., A hybrid finite element model for simulation of electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) based plate waves, NDT & E International43(6) (2010), 519-526.
18.
DixonS., EdwardsC. and PalmerS., High accuracy non-contact ultrasonic thickness gauging of aluminium sheet using electromagnetic acoustic transducers, Ultrasonics39(6) (2001), 445-453.
19.
NakamotoH. et al., Reliability evaluation of pipe thickness measurement by electromagnetic acoustic transducer, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics45(1-4) (2014), 923-929.
20.
ToneR., TanakaY. and FujimotoY., Experiment of receiving ultrasonic wave by using adhesion and a contact type PVDF sensor, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics45(1-4) (2014), 171-177.
21.
WuX., DingX. and WangL., An improved longitudinal wave EMAT based on the shielding effect, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics45(1-4) (2014), 227-233.
22.
WangS. et al., 3-D modeling and analysis of meander-line-coil surface wave EMATs, Mechatronics22(6) (2012), 653-660.
23.
HiraoM. and OgiH., EMATs for science and industry: Noncontacting ultrasonic measurements, 2003: Springer Science & Business Media.
24.
LuoW. and RoseJ., Guided wave thickness measurement with EMATs, Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring45(11) (2003), 735-739.
25.
DhayalanR. and BalasubramaniamK., A two-stage finite element model of a meander coil electromagnetic acoustic transducer transmitter, Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation26(02) (2011), 101-118.
26.
ScrubyC. and MossB., Non-contact ultrasonic measurements on steel at elevated temperatures, NDT & E International26(4) (1993), 177-188.
27.
EdwardsR., DixonS. and JianX., Non-Contact Ultrasonic Characterization of Defects Using EMATs, in REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION. 2005. American Institute of Physics.
28.
LatimerP.J. and MacLauchlanD.T., EMAT probe and technique for weld inspection, 1998, Google Patents.
29.
LudwigR., YouZ. and PalanisamyR., Numerical simulations of an electromagnetic acoustic transducer-receiver system for NDT applications, Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on29(3) (1993), 2081-2089.
30.
ThomasS. et al., A coupled electromagnetic and mechanical analysis of electromagnetic acoustic transducers, International Journal for Computational Methods in Engineering Science and Mechanics10(2) (2009), 124-133.
31.
KaltenbacherM. et al., Finite element analysis of coupled electromagnetic acoustic systems, Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on35(3) (1999), 1610-1613.
32.
MurayamaR. and MizutaniK., Conventional electromagnetic acoustic transducer development for optimum Lamb wave modes, Ultrasonics40(1) (2002), 491-495.
33.
JianX. et al., A model for pulsed Rayleigh wave and optimal EMAT design, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical128(2) (2006), 296-304.
34.
DhayalanR. et al., A hybrid finite element model for spiral coil electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT), International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics46(3) (2014), 491-500.
35.
DoddC. and DeedsW., Analytical Solutions to Eddy-Current Probe-Coil Problems, Journal of Applied Physics39(6) (1968), 2829-2838.
36.
Garcia-RodriguezD., MihalacheO. and UedaM., EMAT simulations based on a two-dimensional FEM coupled electro-mechanical formulation, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics45(1) (2014), 543-549.
37.
KangL. et al., Enhancement of signal amplitude of surface wave EMATs based on 3-D simulation analysis and orthogonal test method, NDT & E International59 (2013), 11-17.
38.
LuC. and ZhangZ.-D., Finite-difference simulation of rayleigh wave scattering at a surface crack with experimental verification, in Piezoelectricity, Acoustic Waves, and Device Applications, 2008. SPAWDA 2008. Symposium on. 2008. IEEE.
39.
WangS. et al., A novel method for modeling and analysis of meander-line-coil surface wave EMATs, in Life System Modeling and Intelligent Computing. 2010, Springer, pp. 467-474.
40.
WangS. et al., Influence of Coil Parameters on Rayleigh Waves Excited by Meander-Line Coil EMATs, in Intelligent Computing for Sustainable Energy and Environment. 2013, Springer, pp. 94-103.
41.
XieY. et al., Simulation of ultrasonic and EMAT arrays using FEM and FDTD, Ultrasonics66 (2016), 154-165.
42.
XieY. et al., Simulation of an Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer Array by using Analytical method and FDTD, Journal of Sensors501 (2016), 5451821.
43.
NakanoH., Some problems concerning the propagation of the disturbances in and on semi-infinite elastic solid, Geophys, Mag2 (1930), 189-348.
