Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Blueberry fruit available in the market comes from cultivars that have been selected for specific traits and not necessarily for high concentrations of health-promoting phytochemicals in the fruit.
OBJECTIVE:
To identify and quantify the total and individual phenolic components and other quality traits from a combination of cultivars from two
METHODS:
Fruit samples were collected from cultivars growing in a randomized complete block design. The phenolic components were assessed on fruit extracts, the fruit weight and firmness were assessed on fresh fruit and the rest of the traits were assessed on fruit juice.
RESULTS:
For most traits the differences between
CONCLUSIONS:
The combination of cultivars in this study was designed to offer the widest possible harvest window; however, it gives high variation in fruit quality.
Introduction
Cultivated blueberries (
Plant & Food Research (PFR) started a blueberry breeding programme in the 1980s with the aim of producing blueberry cultivars that were tailored to New Zealand conditions. Breeding objectives were specific agronomic and fruit traits such as high yield, disease resistance, winter chilling adaptability, seasonality range and hand-harvestable fruit of large size, good firmness and good flavour. A blueberry plantation of well-adapted cultivars has the potential to produce a good crop for many years and thus planting the right genotype is crucial. Growing two or more different cultivars in the same commercial block is a popular choice among New Zealand growers, to satisfy pollination requirements and to extend the production window. We studied a combination of cultivars that was designed to offer the longest possible combined harvest season for the North Island, Waikato Region of New Zealand. To make this possible, a mix of different
Blueberry fruit available in the market comes from cultivars that have been selected for specific agronomic and fruit traits such as high yield and large fruit size and not necessarily for high concentrations of health-promoting phytochemicals in the fruit. For this reason, we believed it was important to measure the phytochemical content and composition of the fruit from the new cultivars and from the comparators and to discuss the results in this study.
Blueberry fruit are widely believed to be good for health because of their high content of polyphenolic compounds, in particular anthocyanins [3]. Anthocyanins provide blueberries with their characteristic colour and have been shown to contribute to the antioxidant capacity of berry fruit [4–10]. The health value of anthocyanins has been reviewed [11, 12, 11, 12], as well as antioxidant capacity [10, 14]. Anthocyanins are reported to have a role in improving circulation [15], preventing stroke [16], providing benefits to vision [17, 18], and their anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative effects have been extensively reported [19–22].
The anthocyanins present in blueberry are galactosides, glucosides and arabinosides of the anthocyanidins delphinidin, cyanidin, petunidin, peonidin and malvidin, and their concentrations vary greatly between genotypes [23, 24]. Additionally, these glycosides may also be acylated [25]. Blueberries are the richest sources of the more hydrophobic malvidins and petunidins among a wide selection of fruits and vegetables [26]. Blueberries are also rich in delphinidin-3-galactoside and petunidin-3-glucoside [27]. Research shows that there is interest in the anthocyanin content of blueberry fruit and that changes are to be expected between fruit of different cultivars and between seasons [23, 28].
With an increased consumption of fresh blueberry fruit over the last decade, there have been specific breeding objectives aimed to improve the fruit quality acceptance as well as the health benefits of the berries. However there is little knowledge on how the phenolics correlate with other different quality traits in blueberry.
The objectives of this three-year study were to: (1) identify and quantify the total and individual phenolic components in fruit from seven
Materials and methods
Chemicals
Solvents and general chemicals were obtained from local suppliers. Reference standards were obtained as follows: cyanidin-3-glucoside from Extrasynthese (Genay, France), chlorogenic acid and rutin from Sigma-Aldrich.
Blueberry cultivation and fruit sample preparation
Blueberry fruit (
The field trial was established as a randomised complete block design with four replications of five plants of each cultivar except for the cultivars ‘Brigitta Blue’, ‘Nui’, ‘Centurion’ and ‘Rahi’ which had a single replication.
The blueberry plants under evaluation were planted in the ground in winter 2007 (June–July) and berries were harvested for three consecutive years (summers 2009–2010, 2010–2011 and 2011–2012). In this work, summer seasons are indicated as follows: 2009–2010 = 2010, 2010–2011 = 2011 and 2011–2012 = 2012.
For each cultivar, 1Kg of fruit was collected per plot when about 50% of the fruit were estimated to be ripe (fully blue). For each cultivar and year of evaluation the mean ripening dates are reported in Table 1.
Fruit weight, firmness and the fruit diameter were assessed on a sub-sample of 20 uniform fully ripe fruit. The assessments were done within 2 h from harvest. For the soluble solids content and titratable acidity assessments a juice sample was extracted from a sub-sample of 100 g of uniform fruit. For the polyphenol and antioxidant assessments, a sub-sample of 100 g of uniform fruit was stored at −20°C until it was analysed.
HPLC analysis of blueberry anthocyanins
Sample preparation, HPLC analysis and confirmation of identity of compounds by mass spectroscopy were carried out as described previously [29].
Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay
The measurements were carried out as described previously [30]. The final results were corrected for dilution, and expressed as
Fruit firmness
Fruit firmness was assessed with FirmTech 2 (BioWorks, Inc.) and the results were expressed as force required (g) to generate a 1-mm deflection on the fruit surface. Fruit was placed on the FirmTech 2 plate on its side so that it would be compressed equatorially, and the fruit diameter was also recorded at the same time as the firmness.
Soluble solid content (SSC) and Titratable acidity (TA)
Soluble solid content (SSC) and titratable acidity (TA) were determined using freshly prepared juice. For each replication of each cultivar, 100 g of sound fruit was pureed using a hand-held blender, the resulting pulp was strained through two layers of cheesecloth and the juice was collected. The SSC was measured using a digital refractometer (model PR-101, Atago Co., Tokyo, Japan); TA (expressed as citric acid) was measured by titrating two 100-mL samples of 5% extracted juice with 0.1 mol L−1 NaOH to pH 8.1.
Statistical analysis
Data were analysed using analysis of variance, testing effects of species against variation between cultivars within species; cultivars, year and species by year interaction against the cultivar by year interaction; and the cultivar by year interaction against the rep to rep variation within cultivars and years. Residuals were inspected to check the assumptions of analysis of variance; in a number of cases data were log-transformed to stabilise the variance. Means presented are on the original scale. Where data were log-transformed, the least significant differences (LSDs) on the log-scale were back-transformed to give least significant ratios (LSR); two means were significantly different if the larger was more than LSR times the smaller. Since many effects were significant, the percentage variation accounted for by each effect was calculated (effect sum of squares/total sum of squares). This helped indicate where the largest differences were for each measure. Correlations between the measures were calculated using the means for each cultivar in each year, and a principal component biplot produced (based on the correlation matrix). The analysis was done with GenStat (version 16, 2013, VSNi Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK).
Results and discussion
Polyphenolic compounds
The total ACY content varied significantly between the two
Seasonal variations were relatively minor for
The cultivars appear to have responded differently to weather variations within each season. The fruit from the majority of
Total Polyphenol Content (TPH)
Similarly to ACY, the TPH varied significantly between the two
Relatively few cultivars showed large seasonal variations in TPH. When it did occur, however, it was inverse to that of total ACY, with marked decreases in the rabbiteye cultivars ‘Dolce Blue’ and ‘Centurion’ in the 2012 season. These cultivars had exceptionally high total ACY in 2012. Apparently, cultivars that respond to cooler weather during ripening by increasing ACY production do so at the expense of other polyphenols.
FRAP
FRAP, a measure of antioxidant capacity, correlates strongly with TPH and ACY, but there are clearly contributions from other compounds. The overall difference between
In our work, however, the majority of the variation for FRAP was attributable to the differences between years (42%). All cultivars exhibited approximately mean values in 2010, but well above mean in 2011 and below mean in 2012 (Table 3). Nothing in the weather records, or any other data collected, appears to explain the high FRAP values in 2011.
Amongst all the cultivars, ‘Centurion’ had the highest FRAP mean value while ‘Brigitta Blue’ had the lowest (Table 3).
Polyphenol components
Compositional analysis of the polyphenols revealed that malvidin (as the sum of the three glycosidic forms) was consistently the major anthocyanin component, comprising 30–50% of the mean total anthocyanin content (data not shown). Total Malvidins (TM) showed a very similar between-species profile to total ACY and little seasonal variation, which accounted for only 3% of the total variance (Table 4). TM ranged between 30 mg/100 g (‘Cosmopolitan’) to 147 mg/100 g (‘Dolce Blue’) with
Chlorogenic acid (CA, Table 4) is the main non-anthocyanin polyphenol in blueberries. This parameter was generally higher in
Quality traits
Blueberry cultivars with large fruit are particularly advantageous to the majority of New Zealand growers who hand-harvest their crop. Fruit weight (FW) varied significantly with cultivar which accounted for the majority of the total variation (87%). The individual FW of cultivars within the species varied greatly (Table 5). Within
The anthocyanins are found only in the skin of blueberries, so it would be expected that small fruit, with relatively more skin area, would tend towards high total ACY. This relationship holds for ‘Dolce Blue’ and ‘Centurion’, but not for small ‘Blue Bayou’ fruit or large ‘Blue Moon’, ‘Nui’ or ‘Cosmopolitan’. This suggests that small fruit size is one of a number of influences on total ACY and has been reported previously [4, 29].
Fruit diameter (FD) reflected greatly the FW for species and cultivar effects in our study (Tables 2B and 5). The difference in FD among cultivars can be of practical importance to New Zealand growers because the fruit can be packed and sold by diameter with a premium price for those fruit with diameter over 18 mm.
Blueberry ripening is accompanied by changes of the fruit firmness, decreases in acidity and increases in sugars [34]; the fruit firmness varies with the stage of maturity [35]. Once initial ripeness has been achieved a further process of overripe softening occurs which is accompanied by further decrease of acidity and increase in sugars. Consequently we felt the need to develop a standard sampling procedure which allowed us to identify when 50% of the fruit on the bush was ripe and before any sign of softening occurred. The regular fruit harvest at 50% of maturity has proven to be a reliable method and of critical importance when comparing results of a number of different cultivars over a number of different seasons.
Fruit of
Differences in phenolic components and fruit traits between the Vaccinium species and during the protracted harvest season
It is perhaps inconvenient that growers cannot easily select an early- and late-maturing cultivar to extend the harvesting season, both with similar characteristics and equally applicable to the same market segment. Retail blueberries are not labelled by cultivar in New Zealand, so consumers may notice some inconsistency with fruit size and quality over the season. With such a prolonged harvest season it is therefore difficult to maintain a consistent fruit quality.
Correlations between phenolics and fruit quality traits
According to our results, the strongest phenotypic correlations were FW with FD (
A significant correlation was reported between antioxidant capacity and anthocyanin content (
The correlations between the individual polyphenol compounds and total anthocyanin contents varied, showing that TM had the strongest positive correlation with ACY. The strongest negative correlations were found between SSC and TA (
Evaluating a multitude of cultivars in test trials is common practice in breeding programmes and it is associated with considerable cost related to the cultivation and maintenance of large numbers of bushes and data collection from the trial. Amongst all the traits included in our work, determining the phytochemicals during the three years for all the cultivars was the most expensive part of the research. According to our results, all the traits analysed in this work except Q and AA from a single year collected from all the cultivars were highly correlated (correlations over 0.8) to the average across the three years (Table 8). Therefore, assessing these traits from a single year of data should be mostly reliable for individual cultivars.
In a previous study [43], the single-year results obtained for fruit weights and total anthocyanin contents were also highly correlated to the averages across the three years (Table 8), which makes evaluation of these traits from a single year and at an early stage of plant development reasonably achievable. It therefore appears that it would be practical to select promising crosses from a breeding programme in the third year of plant growth, with a low probability of missing high-performing plants that happened to perform unusually poorly in year 3. The correlation of the individual polyphenol compounds with the total anthocyanin contents in each year and over the three-year evaluation showed some significant differences (Table 7). Only TM showed consistently positive and significant correlations with ACY, each year and over the three-year period. CA had high positive correlations with ACY, but not in 2011. Overall, TM and CA were highly and positively correlated to the total anthocyanin content over the three years of evaluation. The correlations between AA and ACY, and Q and ACY, were negative over the entire evaluation, but not significantly so.
Conclusions
This study showed that there was a wide variation in polyphenolic and quality traits between blueberry genotypes and species. We found that highbush (
Even though it was not the primary objective of this paper, the information collected may also help to identify sources of breeding material for improving traits (e.g., increasing polyphenol content, or fruit firmness). The diversity in these fruit traits presents a great opportunity for genetic improvement of blueberry through breeding programmes (selection cycles), especially the traits that are not affected by seasonal variation (e.g. all the traits in our study with the exception of TPH, FRAP, CA and Q). In addition to this, when there is no seasonal variation, some fruit traits could be evaluated at an early stage of selection as found previously [28, 29].
