Development models of e-government for the municipalities have been implemented to simplify and improve coexistence between government and citizens. The aim of this paper is to present a preliminary comparison of maturity levels of local e-government between municipalities in some countries particularly in Latin America. The literature review is related with the identification of attributes or e-services offered to the citizen, based on a model to measure the progress of e-government initiatives in municipal environments. Successful models around the world show significant progress in terms of citizen satisfaction reduced bureaucratic attitudes in public institutions and a significant saving of resources. E-government is more than a single website; since, it has added new concepts such as transparency, accountability, citizen participation in the evaluation of government performance.
Fath-AllahA., CheikhiL., Al-QutaishR. and IdriA., A Measurement - Based E-Government Portals' Maturity Model. International Perspectives on Socio-Economic Development in the Era of Globalization, India: IGI Global, 2016, 129-149.
2.
LappasA., TriantafillidouA., KleftodimosA. and YannasP., Evaluationframework of local e-government and e-democracy: A citizens' perspective, 2015 IEEE conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), Melaka (2015), 181-186.
3.
NaserA. and ConchaG., El gobierno electrónico en la gestión pública, Instituto Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES), Naciones Unidad, CEPAL, Santiago de Chile2011.
4.
RochaA. and SáF., Planning the Information Architecture in a Local Public Administration organization, Inf. Dev., 30(3) (2014), 223-234.
5.
RuelasA. and PérezP., El gobierno electrónico: su estudio y perspectivas de desarrollo, UNIrevista1(3) (2006).
6.
WirtzB. and TunaO., Determinants of Citizen Usage Intentions in e-Government: An Empirical Analysis, German University of Administrative Sciences Speyer, Germany, 2016.
7.
Carta Iberoamericana de Gobierno Electrónico, Aprobada por la IX Conferencia Iberoamericana de Ministros de Administración Pública y Reforma del Estado Pucón, Chile, 31 de mayo y 1° de junio de 2007, Adoptada por la XVII Cumbre Iberoamericana de Jefes de Estado y de Gobierno, Santiago de Chile, 10 de noviembre de 2007.
8.
NorrisD. and ReddickC., Local E-Government in the United States: transformation or incremental change? in Public Administration Review73(1) (2013), 165-175.
SáF., RochaA. and PérezM., Potential dimensions for a local e-Government services quality model, Pergamon Press, Inc. NY, USA 33(2) (2016), 270-276.
11.
Foro e-Gobierno OEA, Boletín. Modelos de Madurez en Gobierno Electrónico, Edición 51. Canadá, Marzo 2010.
12.
AramouniG. and PandoD., Midiendo el Gobierno Electrónico. Análisis de páginas web municipales en Argentina, Cátedra Alianza Sumaq en e-Government, Universidad de San Andrés, Buenos Aires, Nov. 2006.
13.
ConchaG. and NaserA., CEPAL - Colección Documentos de proyectos, El desafío hacia el gobierno abierto en la hora de la igualdad, Santiago de Chile, Impreso en Naciones Unidas (2012), 11-14.
14.
RodríguezG., Gobierno Electrónico: hacia la modernización y transparencia de la gestión pública, 2004.
15.
MohammadH., AlmarabehT. and AbuAliA., E-government in Jordan, European Journal of Scientific Research35(2) (2009), 188-197.
16.
GallegoI., RodríguezL. and GarcíaI., Are determining factors of municipal E-government common to a worldwide municipal view, Government Information Quarterly27 (2010), 423-430.
17.
GarcíaI., La nueva gestión pública: evolución y tendencias: Presupuesto y Gasto Público 47/2007: 37-64. Secretaría General de Presupuestos y Gastos, Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, 2007.
18.
AlvarezJ. and IslasJ., Gobierno electrónico en México: ¿Mito o realidad? Descripción, análisis y evaluación del gobierno digital en México, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales/Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 2013.
19.
EstevesJ., Análisis del Desarrollo del Gobierno Electrónico Municipal en España, Papel de Trabajo, Cátedra Software AG - Alianza Sumaq en e-Government, Madrid2005.
20.
EstevesJ. and BohorquezV., Analyzing the development of municipal e-government in peruvian cities, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, São Paulo, Brazil, May 2007.
21.
JusticeJ., MelitskiJ. and SmithD., E-government as an instrument of fiscal accountability and responsiveness: Do the best practitioners employ the best practices?in American Review of Public Administration36(3) (2006), 301-322.
22.
RhodaJ., A structured analysis of e-government studies: Trends and opportunities, Government Information Quarterly, 30(4) (2013), 435-440.
23.
AndersenK. and HenriksenH., E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model, Government Information Quarterly23(2) (2006), 236-248.
24.
GustafssonK. and FiedlerM., E-Government: services, needs and user satisfaction, Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Karlskrona, Sweden2004.
25.
KimK., A cross-national analysis of global E-government, Public Organization Review (2007), 317-329.
26.
LayneK. and LeeJ., Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model, Government Information Quarterly18(2) (2001), 122-136.
27.
AlcaideL., RodríguezM. and LópezA., Investigación metodológica en gobierno electrónico: Evaluación de publicaciones periódicas ISI (2000-2006), Proceedings of the XIV Congress of AECA, September 19-21, Valencia, Spain, 2007.
28.
TorresL., PinaV. and RoyoS., E-government and the transformation of public administrations in EU countries: Beyond NPM or just a second wave of reforms?Online Information Review29(5) (2005), 531-553.
29.
WestM., Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance. Estados Unidos: Princeton University Press, 2007.
30.
NOIE - The National Office for the Information Economy, Common-weath of Australia, e-Government Benefit Study, Canberra, Australia, Abril 2003.
31.
GómezP., El gobierno electrónico en el municipio venezolano, Revista Venezolana de Información, Tecnología y Conocimiento2 (2007), 67-80.
32.
FanQ., An Evaluation Analysis of E-government Development by Local Authorities in Australia, Int. J. Public Adm.34(14) (2011), 926-934.
33.
SharmaS., An E-Government Services Framework, Encyclopedia of Commerce, E-Government and Mobile Commerce, Mehdi Khosrow-Pour, in Information Resources Management Association, Idea Group Reference (2006), 373-378.
Universidad Externado de Colombia, ``Guía de gobierno electrónico local: servicios electrónicos orientados al ciudadano'', Convenio UNESCO - Universidad Externado de Colombia, agosto 2005.
36.
PinaV., TorresL. and RoyoS., Is E-government leading global convergence towards accountable governments?Proccedings of the XIV Congress of AECA, September 19-21, Valencia, Spain, 2007.
