This work focuses on bolstering the pre–existing Interpretable Semantic Textual Similarity (iSTS) method, that will enable a user to understand the behaviour of an artificial intelligent system. The proposed iSTS method explains the similarities and differences between a pair of sentences. The objective of the iSTS problem is to formalize the alignment between a pair of text segments and to label the relationship between the text fragments with a relation type and relatedness score. The overall objective of this work is to develop a 1:M multi chunk aligner for an iSTS method, which is trained on SemEval 2016 Task 2 dataset. The obtained result outperforms many state–of–art aligners, which were part of SemEval 2016 iSTS task.
AbneyS.P., Parsing By Chunks, Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, 1992, pp. 257–278.
2.
AgirreE., Gonzalez-AgirreA., Lopez-GazpioI., MaritxalarM., RigauG. and UriaL., Ubc: Cubes for English semantic textual similarity and supervised approaches for interpretable sts, In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), Denver, Colorado, 2015, pp. 178–183. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3.
AgirreE., Gonzalez-AgirreA., Lopez-GazpioI., MaritxalarM., RigauG. and UriaL., Semeval-2016 task 2: Interpretable semantic textual similarity, In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016), San Diego, California, 2016, pp. 512–524. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4.
AgirreaE., BaneabC., CardiecC., CerdD., DiabeM., Gonzalez-AgirreaA., GuofW., Lopez-GazpioaI., MaritxalaraM., MihalceabR., RigauaG., UriaaL. and WiebeJ., Semeval-2015 task 2: Semantic textual similarity, english, Spanish and pilot on interpretability, In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval’15, Denver, Colorado, 2015, pp. 252–263.
5.
AlevenV., PopescuO. and KoedingerK.R., Pedagogical content knowledge in a tutorial dialogue system to support self-explanation, Working Notes of the AIED 2001 Workhop Tutorial Dialogue Systems (2001).
6.
BanjadeR., MaharjanN., NiraulaN.B. and RusV., Dtsim at semeval-2016 task 2: Interpreting similarity of texts based on automated chunking, chunk alignment and semantic relation prediction, In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016), 2016, pp. 809–813. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7.
BanjadeR., NiraulaN.B., MaharjanN., RusV., StefanescuD., LinteanM. and GautamD., Nerosim: A system for measuring and interpreting semantic textual similarity, In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), Denver, Colorado, ACL, pp. 164–171.
8.
CliveB., van der GootE.,
BlacklerK.,
GarciaT. and HorbyD., Europe media monitor–system description, In EUR Report 22173-En, 2005.
9.
CohenW.W., Fast eective rule induction, In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML’95, 1995, pp. 115–123. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
10.
CollobertR. and WestonJ., A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning, In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, New York, NY, USA, ACM, pp. 160–167.
11.
CorleyC. and MihalceaR., Measuring the semantic similarity of texts, In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment, EMSEE ’05, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2005, pp. 13–18. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12.
FinkelJ.R., GrenagerT. and ManningC., Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by gibbs sampling, In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. ACL, 2005, pp. 363–370.
13.
FraserA. and MarcuD., Measuring word alignment quality for statistical machine translation, In Computational Linguistics, volume 33, Cambridge, MA, USA, MIT Press, 2007, pp. 293–303.
14.
GrosanC. and AbrahamA., Rule–Based Expert Systems, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 149–185.
15.
HenryS. and SandsA., Vrep at semeval-2016 task 1 and task 2: A system for interpretable semantic similarity, In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval@NAACL-HLT 2016, San Diego, CA, USA, 2016, pp. 577–583.
16.
IslamA. and InkpenD., Semantic text similarity using corpus-based word similarity and string similarity, In ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data, volume 2, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 2008, pp. 10:1–10:25.
17.
JiangJ.J. and ConrathD.W., Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy, In Proceedings of International Conference Research on Computational Linguistics, 1997.
18.
JordanP.W., MakatchevM., PappuswamyU., VanLehnK. and AlbaceteP.L., A natural language tutorial dialogue system for physics, In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, 2006, pp. 521–526.
19.
KarumuriS., VuggumudiV.K.R. and ChitiralaS.C.R., Umduluth–blueteam: Svcsts – a multilingual and chunk level semantic similarity system (semeval 2015), In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, 2015a, pp. 107–110. Association for Computational Linguistics.
20.
KarumuriS., VuggumudiV.K.R. and ChitiralaS.C.R., Umduluth-cs8761-12: A novel machine learning approach for aspect based sentiment analysis, In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), Denver, Colorado, 2015b, pp. 742–747. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21.
KleinD. and ManningC.D., Accurate unlexicalized parsing, In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL ’03, pp. 423–430. Association for Computational Linguistics.
22.
LiY., McLeanD., BandarZ.A., O’sheaJ.D. and CrockettK., Sentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus statistics, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering18(8) (2006), 1138–1150.
23.
Lopez-GazpioI., AgirreE. and MaritxalarM., iubc at semeval-2016 task 2: Rnns and lstms for interpretable sts, In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016), San Diego, California, 2016, pp. 771–776. Association for Computational Linguistics.
24.
MarcusM.P., MarcinkiewiczM.A. and SantoriniB., Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank, Computational Linguistics - Special Issue on Using Large Corpora: II19(2) (1993), 313–330.
25.
MelamedI.D., Manual annotation of translational equivalence: The blinker project, University of Pennsylvani, Technical report, 1998.
26.
MihalceaR., CorleyC. and StrapparavaC., Corpus–based and knowledge–based measures of text semantic similarity, In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1, Boston, Massachusetts, AAAI Press, 2006, pp. 775–780.
27.
MikolovT., SutskeverI., ChenK., CorradoG.S. and DeanJ., Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality, In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems – Volume 2, NIPS’13, USA, Curran Associates Inc, pp. 3111–3119.
28.
NielsenR.D., WardW. and MartinJ.H., Recognizing entailment in intelligent tutoring systems*, In Natural Language Engineering, volume 15, New York, NY, USA, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 479–501.
29.
PavlickE., RastogiP., GanitkevitchJ., DurmeB.V. and Callison-BurcC., Ppdb 2.0: Better paraphrase ranking, fine-grained entailment relations, word embeddings, and style classificatio, In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Short Papers), 2015, pp. 425–430. Association for Computational Linguistics.
30.
PedersenT., PatwardhanS. and MichelizziJ., Wordnet:: Similarity: Measuring the relatedness of concepts, In Demonstration papers at Human Language Technology conference / North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Annual Meeting, HLT/NAACL ’04, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2004, pp. 38–41. Association for Computational Linguistics.
31.
RashtchianC., YoungP., HodoshM. and HockenmaierJ., Collecting image annotations using amazon’s mechanical turk, In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, CSLDAMT ’10, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2010, pp. 139–147. Association for Computational Linguistics.
32.
RehurekR. and SojkaP., Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora, In Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks, Valletta, Malta, University of Malta, 2010, pp. 46–50.
33.
ResnikP., Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy, In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1, IJCAI ’95, San Francisco, CA, USA, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, 1995, pp. 448–453.
34.
RusV., LinteanM., BanjadeR., NiraulaN. and StefanescuD., Semilar: The semantic similarity toolkit, In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2013, pp. 163–168. Association for Computational Linguistics.
35.
SangE.F.T.K. and BuchholzS., Introduction to the conll-2000 shared task: Chunking, In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Learning Language in Logic and the 4th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning-Volume 7, ConLL ’00, pp. 127–132. Association for Computational Linguistics.
36.
SultanM.A., BethardS. and SumnerT., Back to basics for monolingual alignment: Exploiting word similarity and contextual evidence, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics2 (2014), 219230.
37.
ToutanovaK., KleinD., ManningC.D. and SingerY., Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network, In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology - Volume 1, NAACL ’03, Edmonton, Canada, 2003, pp. 173–180. Association for Computational Linguistics.
38.
ŠarićF.,
GlavašG.,
KaranM.,
ŠnajderJ. and BašićB.D., Takelab: Systems for measuring semantic text similarity, In Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics - Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, SemEval ’12, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2012, pp. 441–448. Association for Computational Linguistics.
39.
WuZ. and PalmerM., Verb semantics and lexical selection, In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL’94, 1994, pp. 133–138.
