Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFSs), as an extension of intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) for dealing with uncertainty information, have attracted considerable attention in the decision-making area. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is one of the most popular decision-making approaches. In the TOPSIS method, the desired alternative should have not only the shortest distance from the positive ideal solution, but also the farthest distance from the negative ideal solution. Similarity measures play an important role in assessing the degree between ideal and proposal alternatives in decision-making. Thus, this paper aims to provide an extended TOPSIS by developing new similarity measures with PFSs and applying it to multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. The main contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) development of three new similarity measures with PFSs, and investigation of their properties; (2) extension of the TOPSIS method based on the proposed similarity measures; and (3) establishment of a Pythagorean fuzzy decision-making method using the improved TOPSIS method. A case study on the selection of a project delivery system is conducted to show the applicability of the presented approach.

Keywords

Pythagorean fuzzy sets Similarity measure Pythagorean Fuzzy TOPSIS method Project delivery system

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beg and

Rashid , Modelling Uncertainties in Multi-Criteria Decision Making using Distance Measure and TOPSIS for Hesitant Fuzzy Sets, Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research 7(2) (2017), 103–109.

Gitinavardand ,

Jalalvand and

M.S.

Pishvaee , A hierarchical multi-criteria group decision-making method based on TOPSIS and hesitant fuzzy information, International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences 10(3) (2017), 213–232.

J.M.

MerigÍ”ó , Fuzzy decision making using immediate probabilities, Computers and Industrial Engineering 10(3) (2017), 213–232.

Pourahmadi ,

Ebadi and

Nikazar , Industrial Wastes Risk Ranking with TOPSIS Multi Criteria Decision Making Method, Civil Engineering Journal 3(6) (2017), 372–381.

Kacprzyk ,

R.R.

Yager and

J.M.

MerigÍ”ó , Towards human centric aggregation via the ordered weighted aggregation operators and linguistic data summaries: A new perspective on Zadeh’s inspirations, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 14(1) (2019), 16–30.

C.L.

Hwang and

K.S.

Yoon , Multiple attribute decision methods and applications, Germany: Springer, Berlin, 1981.

N.C.

Onat ,

Gumus ,

Kucukvar and

Omer , Application of the TOPSIS and intuitionistic fuzzy set approaches for ranking the life cycle sustainability performance of alternative vehicle technologies, Sustainable Production and Consumption 6 (2016), 12–25.

L.A.

Zadeh , Fuzzy sets, Inform Control 8 (1965), 338–356.

C.T.

Chen , Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114(1) (2000), 1–9.

10.

Atanassov , Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20 (1986), 87–96.

11.

Atanassov , More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 33 (1989), 37–46.

12.

Z.S.

Xu and

X.L.

Zhang , Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information, Knowledge-Based Systems 52 (2013), 53–64.

13.

Torra , Hesitant Fuzzy Sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 25(6) (2010), 529–539.

14.

R. M.

Rodriguez ,

Martinez and

Herrera , Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 20(1) (2012), 109–119.

15.

Garg , A Novel Correlation Coefficients between Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets and Its Applications to Decision-Making Processes. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 31(12) (2016), 1234–1252.

16.

Lee ,

K. S.

Jun and

E. S.

Chung , Robust spatial flood vulnerability assessment for Han River using fuzzy TOPSIS with alpha-cut level set, Expert Systems with Applications 41(2) (2014), 644–654.

17.

X.Z.

Sang and

X.W.

Liu , An analytical solution to the TOPSIS model with interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Soft Computing 20(3) (2016), 1213–1230.

18.

D.O.

Aikhuele and

F.M.

Aikhuele , Extended TOPSIS model for solving multi-attribute decision making problems in engineering, Decision Science Letters 6(4) (2017), 365–376.

19.

H.C.

Liao ,

G.S.

Si ,

Z.S.

Xu and

Fujita , Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Utility Set and Its Application in Selection of Fire Rescue Plans, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(4) (2018). doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040664.

20.

Zhang and

Xu , Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 29(12) (2014), 1061–1078.

21.

J.M.

Merig¨® ,

A.M.

Gil-Lafuente and

R.R.

Yager , An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators, Applied Soft Computin 27 (2015), 423–433.

22.

Blanco-Mesa ,

J.M.

Merig¨® and

A.M.

Gil-Lafuente , Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 32(3) (2017), 2033–2050.

23.

X.W.

An ,

Z.F.

Wang ,

H.M.

Li , and

J.Y.

Ding , Project Delivery System Selection with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Group Decision-Making Method, Group Decision And Negotiation 27(4) (2018), 689–707.

24.

Khanzadi ,

Nasirzadeh ,

S.M.H.

Hassani and

N.N.

Mohtashemi , An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making approach for project delivery system selection, Scientia Iranica 23(3) (2016), 802–814.

25.

T.Y.

Chen , The inclusion-based TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for multiple criteria group decision making, Applied Soft Computing 26 (2015), 57–73.

26.

Liang and

Xu , The New Extension of TOPSIS Method for Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Hesitant Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets, Applied Soft Computing 60 (2017), 167–179.

27.

Zhang and

Xu , Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 29(12) (2014), 1061–1078.

28.

Biswas ,

Pramanik and

B.C.

Giri , Cosine Similarity Measure Based Multi-attribute Decision-making with Trapezoidal Fuzzy Neutrosophic Numbers, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 8 (2014), 46–56.

29.

Xu ,

Zhang and

Wan , A Variation Coefficient Similarity Measure and its Application in Emergency Group Decision-making, Systems Engineering Procedia 5 (2012), 119–124.

30.

X.L.

Zhang , A Novel Approach Based on Similarity Measure for Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 31(6) (2016), 539–611.

31.

Wei and

Wei , Similarity Measures of Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets Based on the Cosine Function and their Applications, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 33(3) (2018), 634–652.

32.

Peng ,

Yuan and

Yang , Pythagorean Fuzzy Information Measures and their Applications, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 32(10) (2017), 991–1029.

33.

R.R.

Yager , Pythagorean fuzzy subsets, in: proceedings of the joint ifsa world congress and nafips annual meeting, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2013. doi: 10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375.

34.

R.R.

Yager , Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 22 (2014), 958–965.

35.

Peng and

Yang , Some Results for Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 30(11) (2015), 1133–1160.

A pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method based on similarity measure and its application to project delivery system selection

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References