The performance of interval neutrosophic sets (INSs) aggregated by resent operator is sensitive to special value (e.g. zero value). This paper proposes a novel algorithm for aggregating INSs and applies it to multiple attribute group decision-making. First, INSs are projected as point sets of a 2D space, thus the interval numbers of INSs and the 2D space points correspond one-to-one. Second, the plant growth simulation algorithm is employed to aggregate each point set and calculate the optimal rally points of each point set, therefore, the collective matrix is established by the optimal rally point set. Third, the proposed method achieved in the implementation of multiple attribute group decision-making with interval neutrosophic information. The simulation shows that the proposed aggregation method is insensitive to special value and achieve better performance than compared approach.
ChuJ., LiuX., WangY., ChinK., A group decision making model considering both the additive consistency and group consensus of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, Computers & Industrial Engineering101 (2016), 227–242.
6.
MiguelD., BustinceL., FernandezH., IndurinJ., Construction of admissible linear orders for interval- valued atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets with an application to decision making, Information Fusion27 (2016), 189–197.
7.
JoshiD., KumarS., Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy choquet integral based topsis method for multi-criteria group decision making, European Journal of Operational Research248(1) (2016), 183–191.
8.
LiaoH.C., XuZ.S., Priorities of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation based on multiplicative consistency, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems22(6) (2014), 1669–1681.
9.
QiuJ.D., LiL., A new approach for multiple attribute group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information, Applied Soft Computing61 (2017), 111–121.
10.
YueZ.L., A group decision making approach based on aggregating interval data into interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information, Applied Mathematical Modelling38(2) (2014), 683–698.
11.
LiuW., LiL., An approach to determining the integrated weights of decision makers based on interval number group decision matrices, Knowledge-Based Systems90(C) (2015), 92–98.
12.
WanS.P., WangF., DongJ.Y., Additive consistent interval-valued atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation and likelihood comparison algorithm based group decision making, European Journal of Operational Research263(2) (2017), 571–582.
13.
WangC.Y., ChenS.M., A new multiple attribute decision making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, linear programming methodology, and the TOPSIS method, Ninth International Conference on Advanced Computational Intelligence (ICACI), 2017, pp. 260–263.
14.
SmarandacheF., A unifying field in logics: Neutrosophic logics, Multiple-Valued Logic8(3) (1999), 489–503.
15.
WuQ., WuP., ZhouL.G., et al., Some new Hamacher aggregation operators under single-valued neutrosophic 2-tuple linguistic environment and their applications to multi-attribute group decision making, Computers & Industrial Engineering116 (2018), 144–162.
16.
LiuP., LiuX., The neutrosophic number generalized weighted power averaging operator and its application in multiple attribute group decision making[J], International Journal of Machine Learning & Cybernetics9(2) (2018), 347–358.
17.
PengX., DaiJ.G., Algorithms for interval neutrosophic multiple attribute decision making based on MABAC, similarity measure and EDAS, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification7(5) (2017), 395–421.
18.
PengX., DaiJ.G., A bibliometric analysis of neutrosophic set: Two decades review from 1998–2017, Artificial Intelligence Review (2018). doi: 10.1007/s10462-018-9652-0
19.
PengX., DaiJ.G., Approaches to single-valued neutrosophic MADM basedon MABAC, TOPSIS and new similarity measure with score function, Neural Computing and Applications29(10) (2018), 939–954.
20.
YeJ., Multiple attribute group decision making based on interval neutrosophic uncertain linguistic variables, International Journal of Machine Learning & Cybernetics8(3) (2015), 1–12.
21.
BroumiS., SmarandacheF., Several similarity measures of neutrosophic sets, Neutrosophic Sets & Systems1(1), 54–62.
22.
YeJ., Vector similarity measures of simplified neutrosophic sets and their application in multicriteria decision making, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems16(2) (2014), 204–211.
23.
PengX., LiuC., Algorithms for neutrosophic soft decision making based on EDAS, new similarity measure and level soft set, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems32(1) (2017), 955–968.
24.
EisaM., A new approach for enhancing image retrieval using neutrosophic sets, International Journal of Computer Applications95(8) (2014), 12–20.
25.
LiuP., TengF., Multiple attribute decision making method based on normal neutrosophic generalized weighted power averaging operator, International Journal of Machine Learning & Cybernetics (2015), 1–13.
26.
PengJ.J., WangJ.Q., WuX.H., et al., Multivalued neutrosophic sets and power aggregation operators with their applications in multi-criteria group decision-making problems, International Journal of Intelligent Systems8(2) (2015), 345–363.
27.
ZhangH.Y., JiP., WangJ.Q., et al., An improved weighted correlation coefficient based on integrated weight for interval neutrosophic sets and its application in multi-criteria decision-making problems, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems8(6) (2015), 1027–1043.
28.
ŞahinR., Cross-entropy measure on interval neutrosophic sets and its applications in multicriteria decision making, Neural Computing & Applications28(5) (2017), 1177–1187.
29.
YeJ., Improved cross entropy measures of single valued neutrosophic sets and interval neutrosophic sets and their multicriteria decision making methods, Cybernetics & Information Technologies15(4) (2015), 13–26.
30.
YeJ., Single valued neutrosophic cross-entropy for multicriteria decision making problems, Applied Mathematical Modelling38(3) (2014), 1170–1175.
31.
LiuP.D., ZhangL.L., LiuX., et al., Multi-valued neutrosophic number bonferroni mean operators with their applications in multiple attribute group decision making, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making15(5) (2016), 1181–1210.
32.
WangH.B., SmarandacheF., ZhangY.Q., et al., Single valued neutrosophic sets, Multispace Multistruct4 (2010), 410–413.
LiT., WangC.F., WangW.B., et al., A global optimization bionics algorithm for solving integer programming – plant growth simulation algorithm, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice25(1) (2005), 76–85.
35.
TangC., LiuR., NiJ., A novel wireless sensor network localization approach: Localization based on plant growth simulation algorithm, Elektronika Ir Elektrotechnika19(8) (2013), 97–100.
36.
RaoR.S., NarasimhamS.V.L., RamalingarajuM., A novel wireless sensor network localization ap proach: Localization based on plant growth simulation algorithm, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems33(5) (2011), 1133–1139.
37.
LuS.L., YuS.Z., A fuzzy k-coverage approach for rfid network planning using plant growth simulation algorithm, Journal of Network and Computer Applications archive39(1) (2014), 280–291.
38.
XuZ.S., On method for uncertain multiple attribute decision making problems with uncertain multiplicative preference information on alternatives, Fuzzy Optimization & Decision Making4(2) (2005), 131–139.
39.
XuZ.S., Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Aggregation: Theory and Application. Beijing. China: SciencePress, 2008, pp. 45–67.
