The major contribution of this analysis is to analyze the confidence complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy weighted averaging (CCQROFWA) operator, confidence complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy ordered weighted averaging (CCQROFOWA) operator, confidence complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy weighted geometric (CCQROFWG) operator, and confidence complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy ordered weighted geometric (CCQROFOWG) operator and invented their feasible properties and related results. Future more, under the invented operators, we diagnosed the best crystalline solid from the family of crystalline solids with the help of the opinion of different experts in the environment of decision-making strategy. Finally, to demonstrate the feasibility and flexibility of the invented works, we explored the sensitivity analysis and graphically shown of the initiated works.
ZadehL.A., Fuzzy sets, Information and Control8(3) (1965), 338–353.
2.
AtanassovK., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems20(1) (1986), 87–96.
3.
HilaK. and AbdullahS., A study on intuitionistic fuzzy sets in Γ-semihypergroups, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems26(4) (2014), 1695–1710.
4.
LiuS., YuW., ChanF.T. and NiuB., A variable weight-based hybrid approach for multi-attribute group decision making under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems36(2) (2021), 1015–1052.
5.
GargH. and RaniD., Novel similarity measure based on the transformed right-angled triangles between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications, Cognitive Computation13(2) (2021), 447–465.
6.
YagerR.R., Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making, IEEE Transection and Fuzzy System22(4) (2013), 958–965.
7.
ZulqarnainR.M., XinX.L., GargH. and KhanW.A., Aggregation operators of pythagorean fuzzy soft sets with their application for green supplier chain management, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems1(3), 1–19.
8.
GulM., Application of Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods in occupational health and safety risk assessment: the case of a gun and rifle barrel external surface oxidation and colouring unit, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics7(1) (2018), 129–149.
9.
EjegwaP.A. and AwololaJ.A., Novel distance measures for Pythagorean fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition problems, Granular Computing6(1) (2021), 181–189.
10.
GaoX. and DengY., Generating method of Pythagorean fuzzy sets from the negation of probability, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence105(3) (2021), 104403–104429.
11.
ChenT.Y., New Chebyshev distance measures for Pythagorean fuzzy sets with applications to multiple criteria decision analysis using an extended ELECTRE approach, Expert Systems with Applications147(2) (2020), 113164–113189.
AliM.I., Another view on q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems33(11) (2018), 2139–2153.
14.
DarkoA.P. and LiangD., Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making with modified EDAS method, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence87(1) (2020), 103259–103291.
15.
ZhangB., MahmoodT., AhmmadJ., KhanQ., AliZ. and ZengS., Cubic q-rung orthopair fuzzy Heronian mean operators and their applications to multi-attribute group decision making, Mathematics8(7) (2020), 1125–1151.
16.
GargH. and ChenS.M., Multiattribute group decision making based on neutrality aggregation operators of q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets, Information Sciences517(2) (2020), 427–447.
17.
JanN., ZedamL., MahmoodT., RakE. and AliZ., Generalized dice similarity measures for q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets with applications, Complex & Intelligent Systems6(1) (2020), 545–558.
18.
LiuZ., WangX., LiL., ZhaoX. and LiuP., Q-rung orthopair fuzzy multiple attribute group decision-making method based on normalized bidirectional projection model and generalized knowledge-based entropy measure, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing2(7) (2020), 1–16.
19.
JoshiB.P. and GegovA., Confidence levels q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and its applications to MCDM problems, International Journal of Intelligent Systems35(1) (2020), 125–149.
20.
VermaR., Multiple attribute group decision-making based on order-α divergence and entropy measures under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment, International Journal of Intelligent Systems35(4) (2020), 718–750.
21.
RiazM., SałabunW., FaridH.M.A., AliN. and WątróbskiJ., A robust q-rung orthopair fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations with application to sustainable energy planning decision management, Energies13(9) (2020), 2155–2178.
22.
WangJ., WeiG., WeiC. and WeiY., MABAC method for multiple attribute group decision making under q-rung orthopair fuzzy environment, Defence Technology16(1) (2020), 208–216.
23.
YangZ., GargH., LiJ., SrivastavaG. and CaoZ., Investigation of multiple heterogeneous relationships using a q-rung orthopair fuzzy multi-criteria decision algorithm, Neural Computing and Applications34(1) (2020), 1–16.
24.
RamotD., MiloR., FriedmanM. and KandelA., Complex fuzzy sets, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems10(2) (2002), 171–186.
25.
AlkouriA.M.D.J.S. and SallehA.R., Complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets, In AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics1482(1) (2012), 464–470.
26.
RaniD. and GargH., Distance measures between the complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to the decision-making process, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification7(5) (2017), 23–48.
27.
GargH. and RaniD., Some results on information measures for complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems34(10) (2019), 2319–2363.
28.
KumarT. and BajajR.K., On complex intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets with distance measures and entropies, Journal of Mathematics2014 (2014), Article ID 972198.
29.
GargH. and RaniD., Novel aggregation operators and ranking method for complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to decision-making process, Artificial Intelligence Review12(3) (2019), 1–26.
30.
NganR.T., AliM., TamirD.E., RisheN.D. and KandelA., Representing complex intuitionistic fuzzy set by quaternion numbers and applications to decision making, Applied Soft Computing87 (2020), 105961–105988.
31.
GargH. and RaniD., Complex interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their aggregation operators, Fundamenta Informaticae164(1) (2019), 61–101.
32.
AliZ., MahmoodT., AslamM. and ChinramR., Another view of complex intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets based on prioritized aggregation operators and their applications to multi-attribute decision making, Mathematics9(16) (2021), 1922–1939.
33.
UllahK., MahmoodT., AliZ. and JanN., On some distance measures of complex Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications in pattern recognition, Complex & Intelligent Systems6(1) (2020), 15–27.
34.
AkramM. and NazS., A novel decision-making approach under complex Pythagorean fuzzy environment, Mathematical and Computational Applications24(3) (2019), 73–94.
35.
AkramM. and SattarA., Competition graphs under complex Pythagorean fuzzy information, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing63(1) (2020), 543–583.
36.
AkramM., KhanA. and Borumand SaeidA., Complex Pythagorean Dombi fuzzy operators using aggregation operators and their decision-making, Expert Systems4(2) (2020), 12626–12639.
37.
MaX., AkramM., ZahidK. and AlcantudJ.C.R., Group decision-making framework using complex Pythagorean fuzzy information, Neural Computing and Applications5(4) (2020), 1–21.
38.
AkramM. and KhanA., Complex Pythagorean Dombi fuzzy graphs for decision making, Granular Computing7(2) (2020), 1–25.
39.
LiuP., MahmoodT. and AliZ., Complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications inmulti-attributegroup decision making, Information11(1) (2020), 5–43.
40.
AliZ. and MahmoodT., Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and their applications in the environment of complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets, Computational and Applied Mathematics39(4) (2020), 1–27.
41.
MahmoodT. and AliZ., Entropy measure and TOPSIS method based on correlation coefficient using complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy information and its application to multi-attribute decision making, Soft Computing25(2) (2021), 1249–1275.
42.
GargH., GwakJ., MahmoodT. and AliZ., Power aggregation operators and VIKOR methods for complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and their applications, Mathematics8(4) (2020), 538–557.
43.
AliZ., MahmoodT. and YangM.S., TOPSIS method based on complex spherical fuzzy sets with Bonferroni mean operators, Mathematics8(10) (2020), 1739–1752.
44.
LiuP., AliZ. and MahmoodT., A method to multi-attribute group decision-making problem with complex q-rung orthopair linguistic information basedon Heronian mean operators, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems12(2) (2019), 1465–1496.
45.
RongY., LiuY. and PeiZ., Complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy 2-tuple linguistic Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and its application to emergency program selection, International Journal of Intelligent Systems35(11) (2020), 1749–1790.
46.
ZengS., PengX., BaležentisT. and StreimikieneD., Prioritization of low-carbon suppliers based on Pythagorean fuzzy group decision making with self-confidence level, Economic Research-Ekonomska istraživanja32(1) (2019), 1073–1087.
47.
XuZ. and YagerR.R., Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of General Systems35(4) (2006), 417–433.
48.
RiazM., PamucarD., Athar FaridH.M. and HashmiM.R., q-Rung orthopair fuzzy prioritized aggregation operators and their application towards green supplier chain management, Symmetry12(6) (2020), 976–1009.
