In this paper we introduce the Publishing Workflow Ontology (PWO), i.e., an OWL 2 DL ontology for the description of workflows that is particularly suitable for formalising typical publishing processes such as the publication of articles in journals. We support the presentation with a discussion of all the ontology design patterns that have been reused for modelling the main characteristics of publishing workflows. In addition, we present two possible application of PWO in the publishing and legislative domains.
K.Belhajjame, O.Corcho, D.Garijo, J.Zhao, P.Missier, D.R.Newman, R.Palma, S.Bechhofer, E.García, J.M.Gómez-Pérez, G.Klyne, J.E.Ruiz, S.Soiland-Reyes, D.De Roure and C.Goble, Workflow-centric research objects: A first class citizen in the scholarly discourse, in: Proc. of the 2nd Workshop on Semantic Publishing (SePublica 2012), A.Garcia Castro, C.Lange, F.van Harmelen and B.Good, eds, CEUR-WS.org, Aachen, Germany, 2012, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-903/paper-01.pdf.
2.
K.Belhajjame, J.Zhao, D.Garijo, K.M.Hettne, R.Palma, O.Corcho, J.M.Gómez-Pérez, S.Bechhofer, G.Klyne and C.A.Goble, The research object suite of ontologies: Sharing and exchanging research data and methods on the open web, in: The Computing Research Repository (CoRR), 2014, abs/1401.4307. http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4307.
3.
E.Blomqvist, A.Gangemi, E.Daga and V.Presutti, Experimenting with eXtreme design, in: Proc. of the Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2010), P.Cimiano and H.S.Pinto, eds, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2010, pp. 120–134. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16438-5_9.
4.
P.Ciccarese and S.Peroni, The collections ontology: Creating and handling collections in OWL 2 DL frameworks, Semantic Web5(6) (2014), 515–529. doi:10.3233/SW-130121.
5.
A.Di Iorio, A.G.Nuzzolese, S.Peroni, D.Shotton and F.Vitali, Describing bibliographic references in RDF, in: Proc. of 4th Workshop on Semantic Publishing (SePublica 2014), A.Garcia Castro, C.Lange, P.Lord and R.Stevens, eds, CEUR-WS.org, Aachen, Germany, 2014, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1155/paper-05.pdf.
6.
R.Falco, A.Gangemi, S.Peroni and F.Vitali, Modelling OWL ontologies with Graffoo, in: ESWC 2014 Satellite Events – Revised Selected Papers, V.Presutti, E.Blomqvist, R.Troncy, H.Sack, I.Papadakis and A.Tordai, eds, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2014, pp. 320–325. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11955-7_42.
7.
A.Gangemi, Norms and plans as unification criteria for social collectives, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems17(1) (2008), 70–112. doi:10.1007/s10458-008-9038-9.
8.
A.Gangemi, S.Borgo, C.Catenacci and J.Lehmann, Task taxonomies for knowledge content, METOKIS Deliverable D7, 2004, http://metokis.salzburgresearch.at/files/deliverables/metokis_d07_task_taxonomies_final.pdf.
9.
A.Gangemi, S.Peroni, D.Shotton and F.Vitali, A pattern-based ontology for describing publishing workflows, in: Proc. of the 5th International Workshop on Ontology and Semantic Web Patterns (WOP 2014), V.de Boer, A.Gangemi, K.Janowicz and A.Lawrynowicz, eds, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1302, CEUR-WS.org, Aachen, Germany, 2014, pp. 2–13, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1302/paper1.pdf.
10.
A.Gangemi and V.Presutti, Ontology design patterns, in: Handbook of Ontologies, S.Staab and R.Studer, eds, 2nd edn, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2009, pp. 221–243. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_10.
11.
D.Garijo and Y.Gil, A new approach for publishing workflows: Abstractions, standards, and linked data, in: Proc. of the 6th Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science (WORKS 2011), ACM, New York, New York, USA, 2011, pp. 47–56. doi:10.1145/2110497.2110504.
12.
K.Hettne, S.Soiland-Reyes, G.Klyne, K.Belhajjame, M.Gamble, S.Bechhofer, M.Roos and O.Corcho, Workflow forever: Semantic web semantic models and tools for preserving and digitally publishing computational experiments, in: Proc. of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Tools for the Life Sciences (SWAT4LS 2011), 2012, pp. 36–37. doi:10.1145/2166896.2166909.
13.
M.Horridge and P.F.Patel-Schneider, OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Manchester syntax, 2nd edn, W3C Working Group Note, 11 December 2012, 2012, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax/.
14.
I.Horrocks, P.F.Patel-Schneider, H.Boley, S.Tabet, B.Grosof and M.Dean, SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language combining OWL and RuleML, W3C Member Submission, 21 May 2004, 2004, http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/.
15.
Y.Hu, K.Janowicz, G.McKenzie, K.Sengupta and P.Hitzler, A linked-data-driven and semantically-enabled journal portal for scientometrics, in: Proc. of the 12th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2013), H.Alani, L.Kagal, A.Fokoue, P.Groth, C.Biemann, J.X.Parreira, L.Aroyo, N.Noy, C.Welty and K.Janowicz, eds, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2013, pp. 114–129. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41338-4_8.
16.
T.Lebo, S.Sahoo and D.McGuinness, PROV-O: The PROV Ontology, W3C Recommendation, 30 April 2013, 2013, http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/.
17.
J.Lehmann, R.Isele, M.Jakob, A.Jentzsch, D.Kontokostas, P.N.Mendes, S.Hellmann, M.Morsey, P.van Kleef, S.Auer and C.Bizer, DBpedia – A large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia, Semantic Web6(2) (2015), 167–195. doi:10.3233/SW-140134.
18.
N.F.Noy, A.Chugh, W.Liu and M.A.Musen, A framework for ontology evolution in collaborative environments, in: Proc. of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2006), I.Cruz, S.Decker, D.Allemang, C.Preist, D.Schwabe, P.Mika, M.Uschold and L.Aroyo, eds, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2006, pp. 544–558. doi:10.1007/11926078_39.
19.
C.O’Connor, S.Haenel, A.Gnanapiragasam, M.Hepp and T.Fleischer, Building an automated XML-based journal production workflow, in: Proc. of the Journal Article Tag Suite Conference 2015 (JATS-Con 2015), National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, 2015, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279927/.
20.
S.Peroni, The semantic publishing and referencing ontologies, in: Semantic Web Technologies and Legal Scholarly Publishing, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2014, pp. 121–193. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04777-5.
21.
S.Peroni, Example of use of PWO: Legislative domain, 2015, Figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1449044.
S.Peroni and D.Shotton, FaBiO and CiTO: Ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations, Web Semantics17 (2012), 33–43. doi:10.1016/j.websem.2012.08.001.
24.
S.Peroni, D.Shotton and F.Vitali, Scholarly publishing and linked data: Describing roles, statuses, temporal and contextual extents, in: Proc. of the 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems (i-Semantics 2012), 2012, pp. 9–16. doi:10.1145/2362499.2362502.
25.
V.Presutti, A.Gangemi, S.David, G.Aguado, M.C.Suárez-Figueroa, E.Montiel-Ponsoda and M.Poveda, A Library of Ontology Design Patterns, NeOn deliverable D2.5.1, 2008, http://neon-project.org/deliverables/WP2/NeOn_2008_D2.5.1.pdf.
26.
E.Prud’hommeaux and G.Carothers, Turtle – Terse RDF Triple Language, W3C Recommendation, 25 February 2014, 2014, http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/.
A.Sebastian, N.F.Noy, T.Tudorache and M.A.Musen, A generic ontology for collaborative ontology-development workflows, in: Proc. of the 16th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2008), A.Gangemi and J.Euzenat, eds, 2008, pp. 318–328. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87696-0_28.
29.
K.Wolstencroft, R.Haines, D.Fellows, A.Williams, D.Withers, S.Owen, S.Soiland-Reyes, I.Dunlop, A.Nenadic, P.Fisher, J.Bhagat, K.Belhajjame, F.Bacall, A.Hardisty, A.N.de la Hidalga, M.P.B.Vargas and C.Goble, The Taverna workflow suite: Designing and executing workflows of Web Services on the desktop, web or in the cloud, Nucleic Acids Research41(W1) (2013), W557–W561. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt328.