The article reflects on the experience of conducting participatory research with all-male premarital stag tour groups in Krakow, Poland. The research therefore concerns the performative and embodied aspects of hegemonic male behaviour that are encouraged and enacted by the British men who take part in such tours. Vital to the process of gaining an ethnographic insight into the highly gendered leisure spaces of the stag tourism phenomenon was a willingness to centre sensory, emotional and embodied data in the research process. Methodological reflections, therefore, recall the effects of conducting research in a setting mediated by the consumption of alcohol and collective drunkenness and pervaded with sensory (the thump of nightclub bass speakers, the drunken cheers of stag group participants, the smell of vodka) and emotive (feelings of elation, amusement and disgust) stimuli. Particular importance can be given to the benefit of mutual ‘common-sense’ experiences in building rapport between researchers and their participants. Such insights are of considerable epistemological value. In closing the article it is suggested that learning to recognise and work with such aspects of the research process is vital in developing effective research competencies.
AndrewsH. (2005) ‘Feeling at Home: Embodying Britishness in a Spanish charter resort’, Tourist Studies, 5(3) 247–266.
2.
BleeK. (1998) ‘White-Knuckle Research: Emotional dynamics in fieldwork with racist activists’, Qualitative Sociology, 21(4) 381–399.
3.
BornemanJ. and HammoudiA. (2009) ‘The Fieldwork Encounter, Experience, and the Making of Truth: An Introduction’ in BornemanJ. and HammoudiA. (eds.) Being There: The Fieldwork Encounter and the Making of Truth. Berkley: California Press.
4.
CoffeyA.The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the representation of identity. London: Sage.
5.
ColemanS. And CrangM. (2002) Tourism: Between Place and Performance. Oxford: Berghahn.
6.
CrouchD. And DesforgesL.2003. ‘The Sensuous in the Tourist Encounter: Introduction: The power of the Body in Tourist Studies’, Tourist Studies, 1(3):5–22.
7.
CrouchD.AronssonL. And WahlstromL. (2001) ‘Tourist Encounters’, Tourist Studies, 1(3) 253–270.
8.
DenzinN.K. and LincolnY.S. (1998) Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. London: Sage.
9.
EdensorT. (2008) ‘Walking Through Ruins’ in IngoldT. and VergunstJ. (eds.) Ways of Walking: Ethnography and practice on foot. Aldershot: Ashgate.
10.
HammersleyM. and AtkinsonP. (2007), Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
11.
HockeyJ. (2009) ‘‘Switch on’: Sensory work in the infantry’, Work, Employment and Society, 23(3) 477–493.
12.
HollandJ. (2007) ‘Emotions and Research’, International Journal of Social Research Methods, 10(3) 195–209.
13.
IngoldT. and VergunstJ. (2008) ‘Introduction’ in IngoldT. and VergunstJ. (eds.) Ways of Walking: Ethnography and practice on foot. Aldershot: Ashgate.
14.
KusenbachM. (2003) ‘Street Phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool’, Ethnography, 4(3) 455–485.
15.
LeeJ. and IngoldT. (2006) ‘Fieldwork on Foot: Perceiving, routing, socializing’ in ColemanS. and CollinsP. (eds.) Locating the field: Space, place and context in anthropology. Oxford: Berg.
16.
LumsdenK. (2009) ‘‘Don't ask a women to do another women's job’: Gendered interactions and the emotional ethnographer’, Sociology, 43(3) 497–513.
17.
MadisonD.S. (2005) Critical Ethnography: Methods, Ethics and Performance. London: Sage.
18.
OkelyJ. (2009) ‘Response to Amy Pollard’, Anthropology Matter, 11(2) 1–4.
19.
PinkS. (2008a) ‘Sense and sustainability: The case of the Slow City movement’, Local Environment, 13(2) 95–106.
20.
PinkS. (2008b) ‘A Urban Tour: The sensory sociality of ethnographic place-making’, Ethnography, 9(2) 175–196.
21.
PollardA. (2009) ‘Field of Screams: Difficulty and ethnographic fieldwork’, Anthropology Matters, 11(2) 1–24.
22.
SchachtS. (1997) ‘Feminist Fieldwork in the Misogynist Setting of the Rugby Pitch: Temporarily becoming a sylph to survive and personally grow’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 26(3) 338–363.
23.
StollerP. (1989) The Taste of Ethnographic Things: The Sense in anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
24.
StollerP. (1997), Sensuous Scholarship. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25.
SwainM.B. (2004) ‘(Dis)embodied experience and power dynamics in tourism research’, PhillimoreJ. and GoodsonL. (eds.) Qualitative Research in Tourism: Ontologies, Epistemologies, Methodologies. Abingdon: Routledge.
26.
UrryJ. (1990). The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and tourism in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
27.
VeijolaS. and JokinenE. (1994), ‘The Body in Tourism’, Theory, Culture and Society, 11:125–151.
28.
VergunstJ. (2010) ‘Rhythms of Walking: History and Presence in a city street’, Space and Culture, 13(4) 376–388.
29.
WacquantL. (2004) Body and Soul: Notebooks of an apprentice boxer. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.