This article considers the idea of the ‘free’ gift, in particular relation to
begging and the receipt of social security benefit and in reference to
ethnographic research with the homeless in London and the South East of England.
The article draws attention to the potential for both ‘dole money’ and spare
change to signify, socially, in ways which wound. This is to recognise the
Maussian connotations and moral framing to contemporary exchanges which mark out
people as poor, even where the intention might be to give freely.
AlexanderJ.C.,
& SmithP. (ed.)
(2005) The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim.Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
2.
BerkingH.
(1999) Sociology of Giving.London:
Sage.
3.
CullenS.,
and HoweL.
(1991) ‘People, Cases and Stereotypes: a Study
of Staff Practice in a DSS Benefit Office’,
Cambridge Anthropology15(1):
1–26.
4.
DavisJ.
(1992) Exchange.Buckingham: Open University
Press.
5.
DeanH. (ed.)
(1999). Begging Questions: The
Policy Press.
6.
DouglasM.
(1990). ‘No Free Gifts’, Foreword to M. Mauss The Gift:
the Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies.London:
Routledge, pp.
vii–xviii.
7.
GodboutJ.T.
(1998) The World of the Gift.Montreal & Kingston:
McGill-Queens University
Press.
8.
GodelierM.
(1998) The Enigma of the Gift.Cambridge: Polity
Press.
9.
HallT.
(2003) Better Times than This: Youth Homelessness in
Britain.London: Pluto
Press.
10.
HartK.
(2000) The Memory Bank: Money in an Unequal
World.London: Profile
Books.
11.
HoweL.
(1985) ‘The “Deserving” and the “Undeserving”:
Practice in an Urban, Local Social Security Office’,
Journal of Social Policy14(1):
49–72.
12.
HoweL.
(1990). Being Unemployed in Northern Ireland: an
Ethnographic Study.Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
13.
IgnatieffM.
(1994) The Needs of Strangers.London:
Vintage.
