In this journal, Elliott and Ellingworth (1997)reported their attempts to assess
the impact of certain sources of survey error on the British Crime Survey. This
article attempts to correct some flaws in their article, to place their results
in a wider context, and to provide some further - arguably more robust -
estimates of the impact of non-response bias.
ANDERSENR.,
KASPERJ.,
FRANKELM.R.,
and Associates (1979) Total Survey Error.San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
2.
ARMSTRONGJ.,
and OVERTONT.
(1977) ‘Estimating nonresponse bias in mail
surveys’, Journal of Marketing Research,
vol. 14, pp.
396–402.
3.
BARNESB.
(1995) ‘Studies of non-respondents in OPCS
household surveys using Census data’, Survey
Methodology Bulletin, no. 30, pp.
21–24.
4.
BARTONJ.
(1996) ‘Selecting stratifiers for the Family
Expenditure Survey (FES)’, Survey Methodology
Bulletin, no. 39, pp.
21–26.
5.
DIPPOC.
(1997) ‘Survey measurement and process
improvement: concepts and integration’ in
LybergL.,
BiemerP.,
CollinsM.,
deLeeuwE.,
DippoC.,
SchwarzN.,
and TrewinD.
(editors) Survey Measurement and Process Quality.New York:
Wiley.
6.
ELLIOTTC.,
and ELLINGWORTHD.
(1997) ‘Assessing the Representativeness of the
1992 British Crime Survey: The Impact of Sampling Error and Response
Biases’, Sociological Research Online, vol.
2, no. 4, <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/4/3.html>.
GROVESR.M.
(1989) Survey Errors and Survey Costs.New York:
Wiley.
9.
HALESJ.
(1992) British Crime Survey (England and Wales)
Technical Report.London:
SCPR.
10.
HANSENM.,
and HURWITZW.
(1946) ‘The Problem of Nonresponse in Sample
Surveys’, Journal of the American Statistical
Association, vol. 41, pp.
517–529.
11.
HANSENM.H.,
HURWITZW.N.,
and BERSHADM.A.
(1961) ‘Measurement errors in censuses and
surveys’, Bulletin of the International Statistical
Institute, vol. 38, no. 2, pp.
359–374.
12.
JOHNSONC. E.
(1974) Consistency of Reporting of Ethnic Origin in the
Current Population Survey, Technical Paper no. 31.
Washington DC: Bureau of the
Census.
13.
KALTONG.
(1983) Compensating for Missing Survey Data.ISR Research Report. Michigan:
Survey Research Center, University of
Michigan.
14.
KISHL.
(1965) Survey Sampling.New York:
Wiley.
15.
LYNNP.
(1996a) ‘Weighting for
Non-Response’, in
BanksR.,
FairgrieveJ.,
GerrardL.,
OrchardT.,
PayneC., and
WestlakeA.
(editors) Survey and Statistical Computing 1996: Proceedings of the
Second ASC International Conference.Chesham: Association for Survey
Computing.
16.
LYNNP.
(1996b) ‘Who responds to the British Crime
Survey?’, paper presented to Essex ‘96, the Fourth International
ISA Conference on Social Science Methodology, July 1-5 1996, University of
Essex, Colchester UK, July 1-4.
17.
LYNNP.
(1997a) ‘Sampling frame effects on the British
Crime Survey’, Journal of the Royal Statistical
Society Series A, vol. 160, no. 2,
pp. 253–269.
18.
LYNNP.
(1997b) ‘Collecting Data About Non- respondents to the
British Crime Survey’, unpublished report to The Home
Office.
19.
LYNNP., and
LIEVESLEYD.
(1991) Drawing General Population Samples in Great
Britain.London:
SCPR.
20.
LYNNP., and
TAYLORB.
(1995) ‘On the Bias and Variance of Samples of
Individuals: A Comparison of the Electoral Registers and Postcode Address
File as Sampling Frames’, The Statistician,
vol. 44, no. 2, pp.
173–194.
21.
MOSERC.A.,
and KALTONG.
(1971) Survey Methods in Social Investigation
(second edition).
Aldershot:
Gower.
22.
O'MUIRCHEARTAIGHC.
(1997) ‘Measurement error in
surveys’ in
LybergL.,
BiemerP.,
CollinsM.,
deLeeuwE.,
DippoC.,
SchwarzN.,
and TrewinD.
(editors) Survey Measurement and Process Quality.New York:
Wiley.
23.
OPCS (1987)
General Household Survey 1985.London: Her Majesty's Stationery
Office.
24.
SMITHT.
(1997) Measuring Race by Observation and
Self-Identification.GSS Methodological Report no. 89. Chicago:
National Opinion Research
Center.
25.
STUARTA.
(1984) The Ideas of Sampling.London:
Griffin.
