We draw on ‘new’ class analysis to argue that mockery frames many cultural representations of class and move to consider how it operates within the processes of class distinction. Influenced by theories of disparagement humour, we explore how mockery creates spaces of enunciation, which serve, when inhabited by the middle class, particular articulations of distinction from the white, working class. From there we argue that these spaces, often presented as those of humour and fun, simultaneously generate for the middle class a certain distancing from those articulations. The plays of articulation and distancing, we suggest, allow a more palatable, morally sensitive form of distinction-work for the middle-class subject than can be offered by blunt expressions of disgust currently argued by some ‘new’ class theorising. We will claim that mockery offers a certain strategic orientation to class and to distinction work before finishing with a detailed reading of two Neds comic strips to illustrate what aspects of perceived white, working class lives are deemed appropriate for these functions of mockery. The Neds, are the latest comic-strip family launched by the publishers of children's comics The Beano and The Dandy, D C Thomson and Co Ltd.
AdamsM., and RAISBOROUGHJ. (2008). ‘What Can Sociology Say About Fair Trade? Ethical Consumption, Reflexivity and Class’, Sociology Vol. 42(6), pp. 1165–1182[doi: 10.1177/0038038508096939]
2.
BeaulieuT. (2007). ‘Contextual Feminism: Negotiating Feminist Principles and Identity In Context Specific Settings’, 2007 International Society of Theoretical Psychology Conference: York University, Toronto: Canada.
3.
BeckU., and WILLMSJ. (2004) Conversations with Ulrich Beck.Cambridge: Polity
4.
BokL. (2004) The Little Book of ChavsBath: Crombie Jardine Publishing Limited
5.
BilligM. (2005) Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour.London: Sage
6.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction (translated by R. Nice). London: Routledge
7.
BrannenJ., and NILSENA. (2005). ‘Individualisation, Choice and Structure: A Discussion of Current Trends in Sociological Analysis’, Sociological Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 412–428. [doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00559.x]
8.
CarrierD. (2000) The Aesthetics of Comics.Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
CromptonR. (2006) ‘Class and Family’Sociological Review Vol. 55(4): 658–677.
11.
DaviesJ.P. (2005). ‘Maxim Magazine and the Management of Contempt’, Journal of Popular Culture, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 1011–1021.
12.
DobsonH. (2006). ‘Mister Sparkle meets the Yakuza: Depictions of Japan in The Simpsons’, Journal of Popular Culture, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 44–68. [doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5931.2006.00203.x]
13.
DomoshM. (2001). ‘The ‘Women of New York’: A Fashionable Moral Geography’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 19, pp. 573–592 [doi: 10.1068/d255]
14.
DorfmanA., & MATTELARTA. (2006). ‘Introduction: Instructions on How to Become a General in the Disneyland Club’ in DurhamM.G., and KellnerD. (eds.) Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks.London: Blackwell Publishing
15.
EpsteinD., and STEINBERGD.L. (1998). ‘American Dreamin’: Discoursing Liberally on the Oprah Winfrey Show’, Women's Studies International Forum, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 77–94. [doi: 10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00079-4]
16.
FordT.E., and FERGUSONM.A. (2004). ‘Social Consequences of Disparagement Humour: A Prejudiced Norm Theory’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 79–94. [doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0801_4]
17.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity.Cambridge: Polity
18.
GiddensA. (1994). ‘Living in a Post-Traditional Society’, in BeckU., GiddensA., and LasS., Reflexive Modernization, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 56–109.
19.
HaylettC. (2001). ‘Illegitimate Subjects?: Abject Whites, Neoliberal Modernisation, and Middle-class Multiculturalism’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 19, pp. 351–370. [doi: 10.1068/d237t]
20.
HaywardK., and YARM. (2006). ‘The ‘Chav’ Phenomenon: Consumption, Media And The Construction Of A New Underclass’, Crime Media Culture, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 9–28. [doi: 10.1177/1741659006061708]
JoffeH., and STAERKLÉC. (2007). ‘The Centrality of the Self-Control Ethos in Western Aspersions Regarding Outgroups: A Social Representational Approach to Stereotype Content’, Culture & Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 395–418.
23.
KhatibL. (2004). ‘The Politics Of Space: The Spatial Manifestations Of Representing Middle Eastern Politics’, Visual Politics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 69–90.
LawlerS. (2005). ‘Disgusted Subjects: The Making Of Middle-Class Identities’, Sociological Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 429–446. [doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00560.x]
26.
LockyerS., & PICKERINGM. (2008). ‘You Must Be Joking: The Sociological Critique of Humour and Comic Media’Sociology Compass2/3: 808–820
27.
McallisterM.P., SEWELLE.H.Jr., and GORDONI. (editors) (2001). Comics and Ideology.New York: Peter Lang.
28.
McdowellL. (2006). ‘Reconfigurations of Gender And Class Relations: Class Differences, Class Condescension And The Changing Place Of Class Relations’, Antipode, Vol, 38, No. 4, pp. 825–850.
29.
McrobbieA. (2004). ‘Notes On ‘What Not To Wear’ And Post-Feminist Symbolic Violence’, Sociological Review, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 99–109.
30.
MillerW. (1997) The Anatomy of Disgust.Harvard University Press: Cambridge: MA.
31.
MitchellD. (2005). ‘Producing Containment: The Rhetorical Construction Of Difference In Will And Grace’, Journal of Popular Culture, Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. 1050–1068. [doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5931.2005.00175.x]
32.
NayakA. (2006). ‘Displaced Masculinities: Chavs, Youth and Class in the Post-Industrial City’, Sociology, Vol. 40, No. 5. pp. 813–831. [doi: 10.1177/0038038506067508]
33.
PilrigK., and McGLINCHYK. (2005) NedworldEdinburgh: Black & White Publishing
34.
ReayD. (2007). ‘Unruly Places: Inner-city Comprehensives, Middle-Class Imaginaries and Working-class Children’Urban Studies, Vol. 44 no 7, 1191–1203. [doi: 10.1080/00420980701302965]
35.
ReayD. (2006). “I'm not seen as one of the clever children”: Consulting primary school pupils about the social conditions of learning’Education Review vol 58 no 2, 171–181. [doi: 10.1080/00131910600584066]
36.
ReayD., HOLLINGWORTHS., WILLIAMSK., CROZIERG., JAMIESONF., JAMESD., and BEEDELLP. (2007). ‘A Darker Shade of Pale?’ Whiteness, the Middle Classes and Multi-Ethnic Inner City Schooling’, Sociology, Vol. 41. No. 6, pp. 1041–1060. [doi: 10.1177/0038038507082314]
37.
RoseN. (1990) Governing the Soul: the Shaping of the Private Self.London: Routledge.
38.
RozinP. (1997) ‘Moralization’, in BrandtA, and RozinP. (editors) Morality and Health.London: Routledge.
39.
SandersT. (2004). ‘Controllable Laughter: Managing Sex Work Through Humour’, Sociology, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 273–292.
40.
SavageM. (2003). ‘Review Essay: A New Class Paradigm’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 535–541. [doi: 10.1080/01425690301920]
41.
SavageM., BAGNALLG., and LONGHURSTB. (2001). ‘Ordinary, Ambivalent and Defensive: Class Identities in the Northwest of England’, Sociology, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 875–892. [doi: 10.1177/0038038501035004005]
SkeggsB. (2005) ‘The Making of Class and Gender through Visualizing Moral Subject Formation’, Sociology Vol. 39(5): 965–982 [doi: 10.1177/0038038505058381]
ValentineJ. (1998). ‘Naming the Other: Power, Politeness and the Inflation of Euphemisms’, Sociological Research Online, Vol. 3, No. 4, <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/3/4/7.html>
55.
VincentC., and BALLS.J. (2007) ‘Making Up’ the Middle-Class Child: Families, Activities and Class Dispositions’, Sociology, Vol. 41, No. 6, pp. 1061–1077 [doi: 10.1177/0038038507082315]
56.
WelshmanJ. (2006) Underclass: A History of the Excluded: 1880-2000.London: Hambledon Continuum.
57.
WilliamsJ. (1994) Comics: A tool for subversion?Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture2(6): 129–146.
