This paper interrogates the practices of professional photographers working on commissions associated with urban regeneration. As distinct from analysis of the images that are an outcome of their labour, little is currently known about the knowledges of photographers working in such contexts. Drawing on research with one firm of photographers in Liverpool, UK, the article focuses on the ways in which these cultural producers describe and make sense of their productions vis-à-vis wider regeneration contexts; particular attention is paid to the ways in which they interpret and translate the criteria surrounding commissions into practice. A general contention concerns the photographers’ reflexivity relative to the constraints and affordances they associate with commissioned regeneration work, which sees them operationalising the social visions emanating from clients working in urban policy sector. The article addresses the sets of social practices necessary to secure the conditions for making images in such contested contexts.
ArreolaD. & BurkhartN. (2010) ‘Photographic postcards and visual urban landscape’, Urban Geography31 (7) p. 885–904.
2.
BarthesR. (1981) Camera Lucidia: Reflections of Photography. New York: Hill and Wang.
3.
BazinA. (1960) ‘The ontology of the photographic image’, Film Quarterly13 (4) p. 4–9 (trans. GrayHugh).
4.
BeckerH. S. (1974), ‘Photography and sociology’, Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 1 p. 3–26.
5.
BeckerH. S. (2001) ‘Visual sociology, documentary photography, and photojournalism: It's (almost) all a matter of context’, Visual Sociology, 10 (1-2) p. 4–14.
6.
BeckerH. S. (2004) ‘Visual evidence: A seventh man, the specified generalization, and the work of the reader’, Visual Studies, 17 (1) p. 3–11.
7.
BenjaminW. ([1931] 1972) ‘A short history of photography’, Screen, 13 (1) p. 5–26.
8.
BennettR. & KoudelovaR. (2001) ‘Image selection and the marketing of downtown areas in London and New York’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14 (3) p. 205–220.
9.
BlaikieA. (2006) ‘Photography, childhood and urban poverty: Remembering the “forgotten gorbals”’, Visual Culture in Britain, 7 (2) p. 47–68.
10.
BolandP. (2008) ‘The construction of images of people and place: Labelling Liverpool and stereotyping scousers’, Cities, 25 (6) p. 355–369.
11.
BourdieuP. (1989) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
12.
BourdieuP. (1990) Photography: A Middle-Brow Art. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
BramwellB. & RawdingL. (1996) ‘Tourism marketing images of industrial cities’, Journal of Tourism Research, 23 (1) p. 201–221.
14.
BurriR. V. (2012) ‘Visual rationalities: Towards a sociology of images’, Current Sociology, 60 (1) p. 45–60.
CornelissenC. (2005) ‘Producing and imaging “place” and “people”: The political economy of South African international tourist representation’, Review of International Political Economy, 12 (4) p. 674–699.
17.
CorriganP. (1988) ‘“Innocent stupidities”: de-picturing (human) nature. On hopeful resistances and possible refusals: celebrating difference (s)-again’, in FyfeG. & LawJ. (Eds.), Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations (p. 255–281). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
18.
CouchC. (2003) City of Change and Challenge: Urban Planning and Regeneration in Liverpool. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate.
19.
CrangM. (1997) ‘Picturing practices: research through the tourist gaze’, Progress in Human Geography, 21 (3) p. 359–373.
20.
CrangM. (1999) ‘Practices of vision’, in CrouchD. (Ed.), Leisure/Tourism Geographies: Practices and Geographical Knowledge. London: Routledge.
21.
DerieuD. (2012) ‘Le Corbusier and the representational function of photography’, in HiggotA. & WrayT. (Eds.), Camera Constructs: Photography, Architecture and the Modern City (p. 159–178). Surrey: Ashgate.
22.
FosdickS. & FahmyS. (2007) ‘Epistemic honesty and the default assumption that photos are true’, Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education, 7 (1) p. 1–10.
23.
FroshP. (2001) ‘Inside the image factory: stock photography and cultural production’, Media, Culture and Society, 23 (5) p. 625–646.
24.
GarfinkelH. (1984) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
GarlickS. (2002) ‘Revealing the unseen: tourism, art and photography’, Cultural Studies, 16 (2) p. 289–305.
26.
HallT. & HubbardP. (Eds.) (1996) The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime, and Representation. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
27.
HackingI. (1983) Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HarperD. (1988) ‘Visual sociology: expanding sociological vision’, The American Sociologist, 19 (1) p. 54–70.
29.
HarveyD. (1989) ‘From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation of urban governance in late capitalism’, Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 71B (1) p. 3–17
30.
HarveyP. (2009) ‘Between narrative and number: the case of ARUP's 3D digital city model’, Cultural Sociology, 3 (2) p. 257–276.
31.
HiggotA. (2012) ‘Frank Yerbury and the representation of the new’, in HiggotA. & WrayT. (Eds.), Camera Constructs: Photography, Architecture and the Modern City (p. 23–34). Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
32.
JamesP. (2004) ‘Birmingham, photography and change’, in KennedyL. (Ed.), Remaking Birmingham: The Visual Culture of Urban Regeneration (p. 99–112). London: Routledge, SPON.
33.
JanssonA. & LagerkvistA. (2009) ‘The future gaze: city panoramas as politico-emotive geographies, Journal of Visual Culture, 8 (1) p. 22–53.
34.
JessopB. (2004) ‘Critical Semiotic Analysis and Cultural Political Economy’, Critical Discourse Studies, 1 (1) p. 1–16.
35.
JessopB. (2010) ‘Cultural political economy and critical policy studies’, Critical Policy Studies, 3 (3-4) p. 336–356.
36.
JonesP. (2009) ‘Putting architecture in its social place: a cultural political economy of architecture’Urban Studies, 46 (12) p. 2519–2536.
37.
JonesP. (2011) The Sociology of Architecture. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
38.
JonesP. & Wilks-HeegS. (2004) ‘Capitalising culture: Liverpool 2008’, Local Economy, 19 (4) p. 41–60.
39.
KearnsG. & PhiloG. (Eds.) (1993) Selling places: the city as cultural capital, past and present. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
40.
KnowlesC. & SweetmanP. (2004) Picturing the Social Landscape. London: Routledge.
KraussR. (1989) ‘Photography's discursive spaces’, in BoltonR. (Ed.), The Contest of Meaning: Critical Histories of Photography (p. 287–303). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
LefebvreH. ([1973] 1991) The Production of Space (trans Nicolson-SmithD.). Oxford: Blackwell.
NewburyD. (1997) ‘Talking about practice: photography students, photographic culture and professional identities’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18 (3) p. 421–435.
49.
ParkerD. & LongP. (2004) ‘“The mistakes of the past”? Visual narratives of urban decline and regeneration’, Visual Culture in Britain, 5 (1) p. 37–58.
50.
RichterA. (2011) The Politics of ‘Participation’ in Liverpool, European Capital of Culture 2008. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Leeds Metropolitan University.
51.
RoseG. (1997) ‘Engendering the slum: photography in East London in the 1930s’, Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geograohy, 4 (3) p. 277–300.
52.
RoseG. (2001) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. London: Sage.
53.
RosenblumN. ([1984] 2007) A World History of Photography. New York City: Abbeville Publishing Group.
54.
RubinF. D. (2012) ‘The material production of the spiral jetty: a study of culture in the making’, Cultural Sociology, 6 (2) p. 143–161.
55.
SacksH. (1989) ‘Lecture Six: The M. I. R Membership Categorization Device’, Human Studies, 12 p. 271–281.
56.
SayerA. (2001) ‘For a critical cultural political economy’, Antipode33 (4) p. 687–708.
57.
ScarlesC. (2004) ‘Mediating landscapes: the processes and practices of image construction in tourist brochures of Scotland’, Tourist Studies, 4 (1) p. 43–67.
58.
ScarlesC. (2009) ‘Becoming tourist: renegotiating the visual in the tourist experience’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27 (3) p. 465–488.
59.
SlaterD. (2002) ‘Marketing mass photography’, in DavisH. & WaltonP. (Eds.), Language, Image, Media (p. 245–263). Oxford: Blackwell.
60.
SquiresC. (1992) ‘The corporate year in pictures’, in BoltonR. (Ed.), The Contest of Meaning: Critical Histories of Photography. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61.
SucharC. S. (1997) ‘Grounding visual sociology in shooting scripts’, Qualitative Sociology, 20 (1) p. 33–55.
62.
SweetmanP. (2009) ‘Revealing habitus, illuminating practice: Bourdieu, photography, and visual methods’, The Sociological Review, 57 (3) p. 491–511.
63.
UrryJ. (1992 [2002]) The Tourist Gaze: Some Thing and Something Else in Postmodern Society. London: Sage.
64.
Varga-AtkinsT. & O'BrienM. (2009) ‘From drawings to diagrams: maintaining researcher control during graphic elicitation in qualitative interviews’, International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32 (1) p. 53–67.
65.
WallisG. W. (1970) ‘Chronopolitics: the impact of time perspectives on the dynamics of change’, Social Forces, 49 (1) p. 102–108.
66.
WeberM. (1951) Theory of Economy and Society. New York: Free Press.
67.
WolbertB. (2000) ‘The anthropologist as photographer: the visual construction of ethnographic authority’, Visual Anthropology, 13 p. 321–343.
68.
WylyE. (2010) ‘Things pictures don't tell us: in search of Baltimore’, City, 14 (5) p. 497–528.
