In this work, an alumina scaffold was produced through a new method to be used in a near future as a bone substitute.
Methods
In vitro and in vivo studies were performed in order to characterize the mechanical and biological properties of the scaffold.
Results
The results obtained showed that this scaffold has high mechanical resistance and a porous surface that allows human osteoblast cells to adhere and proliferate. The in vivo studies revealed no systemic reaction.
Conclusions
The alumina scaffold produced herein has the mechanical and biological properties that are compatible with its application in bone therapy.
StevensM.Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering.Mater Today (Kidlington)2008; 11: 18–25.
2.
SantoraL., SkolbekkenJ.From brittle bones to standard deviations: the historical development of osteoporosis in the late twentieth century.Sci Technol Human Values2010.
3.
BuenoE.M., GlowackiJ.Cell-free and cell-based approaches for bone regeneration.Nat Rev Rheumatol2009; 5(12): 685–97.
4.
DvirT., TimkoB., KohaneD., LangerR.Nanotechnological strategies for engineering complex tissues.Nat Nanotechnol2010.
5.
CoimbraP., FerreiraP., de SousaH., BatistaP., RodriguesM., CorreiaI.Preparation and chemical and biological characterization of a pectin/chitosan polyelectrolyte complex scaffold for possible bone tissue engineering applications.Int J Biol Macromol2010.
6.
Vallet-RegiM.Evolution of bioceramics within the field of biomaterials.C R Chim2010; 13: 174–85.
7.
LiZ., RamayH.R., HauchK.D., XiaoD., ZhangM.Chitosan-alginate hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomaterials2005; 26: 3919–28.
8.
RezwanK., ChenQ.Z., BlakerJ.J., BoccacciniA.R.Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomaterials2006; 27: 3413–31.
9.
CenniE., PerutF., BaldiniN.In vitro models for the evaluation of angiogenic potential in bone engineering.Acta Pharmacol Sin2010.
10.
ShalumonK.T., AnulekhaK.H., GirishC.M., PrasanthR., NairS.V., JayakumarR.Single step electrospinning of chitosan/poly(caprolactone) nanofibers using formic acid/acetone solvent mixture.Carbohydr Polym2010; 80: 413–9.
11.
RuckhT.T., KumarK., KipperM.J., PopatK.C.Osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells on poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanofiber scaffolds.Acta Biomater2010; 6: 2949–59.
12.
PuppiD., ChielliniF., PirasA.M., ChielliniE.Polymeric materials for bone and cartilage repair.Prog Polym Sci2010; 35: 403–40.
13.
Perez-SanchezM.J., Ramirez-GlindonE., Lledo-GilM., Calvo-GuiradoJ.L., Perez-SanchezC.Biomaterials for bone regeneration.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal2010; 15: E517–E22.
14.
ReyesC.D., PetrieT.A., BurnsK.L., SchwartzZ., GarciaA.J.Biomolecular surface coating to enhance orthopaedic tissue healing and integration.Biomaterials2007; 28: 3228–35.
15.
GuarinoV., CausaF., TaddeiP., di FoggiaM., CiapettiG., MartiniD.Polylactic acid fibre-reinforced polycaprolactone scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomaterials2008; 29: 3662–70.
LeeY., HaY., YooJ., KooK., YoonK., KimH.Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of ten years, of a previous report.J Bone Joint Surg2010; 92: 1715.
18.
LeeS.H., ShinH.Matrices and scaffolds for delivery of bioactive molecules in bone and cartilage tissue engineering.Adv Drug Deliv Rev2007; 59: 339–59.
19.
TohmaY., TanakaY., OhgushiH., KawateK., TaniguchiA., HayashiK.Early bone in-growth ability of alumina ceramic implants loaded with tissue-engineered bone.J Orthop Res2006; 24: 595–603.
20.
SwanE.E.L., PopatK.C., GrimesC.A., DesaiT.A.Fabrication and evaluation of nanoporous alumina membranes for osteoblast culture.J Biomed Mater Res A2005; 72A: 288–95.
21.
RibeiroF.V., NocitiF.H., SallumE.A., CasatiM.Z.Effect of aluminum oxide-blasted implant surface on the bone healing around implants in rats submitted to continuous administration of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors.IntJ Oral Maxillofac Implants2009; 24: 226–33.
22.
RamboC.R., MullerF.A., MullerL., SieberH., HofmannI., GreilP.Biomimetic apatite coating on biomorphous alumina scaffolds.Mater Sci Eng C Biomim Mater Sens Syst2006; 26: 92–9.
23.
BoseS., DarsellJ., HosickH.L., YangL., SarkarD.K., BandyopadhyayA.Processing and characterization of porous alumina scaffolds.J Mater Sci Mater Med2002; 13: 23–8.
24.
LiJ.P., de WijnJ.R., Van BlitterswijkC.A., de GrootK.Porous Ti6Al4V scaffold directly fabricating by rapid prototyping: Preparation and in vitro experiment.Biomaterials2006; 27: 1223–35.
25.
LiJ.P., HabibovicP., van den DoelM., WilsonC.E., de WijnJ.R., van BlitterswijkC.A.Bone ingrowth in porous titanium implants produced by 3D fiber deposition.Biomaterials2007; 28: 2810–20.
26.
YoonB.H., ChoiW.Y., KimH.E., KimJ.H., KohY.H.Aligned porous alumina ceramics with high compressive strengths for bone tissue engineering.Scr Mater2008; 58: 537–40.
27.
MendoncaG., MendoncaD.B.S., SimoesL.G.P., AraujoA.L., LeiteE.R., DuarteW.R.Nanostructured alumina-coated implant surface: effect on osteoblast-related gene expression and bone-to-implant contact in vivo.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants2009; 24: 205–15.
28.
ChandaA., SinghaRoyR., XueW.C., BoseS., BandyopadhyayA.Bone cell-materials interaction on alumina ceramics with different grain sizes.Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2009; 29: 1201–6.
29.
MikiY., SuzukiT., NagasakiS., HataS., AkahiraJ., SasanoH.Comparative effects of raloxifene, tamoxifen and estradiol on human osteoblasts in vitro: Estrogen receptor dependent or independent pathways of raloxifene.J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol2009; 113: 281–9.
30.
HarrisS.A., EngerR.J., RiggsL.B., SpelsbergT.C.Development and characterization of a conditionally immortalized human fetal osteoblastic cell line.J Bone Miner Res1995; 10: 178–86.
31.
PintoD., SilvaA., SegadaesA., DevezasT., editors. Influence of surface area on the flowability behaviour of self-flow refractory castables2010: Trans Tech.
Ganapathy-KanniappanS., GeschwindJ.F.H., KunjithapathamR., BuijsM., SyedL.H., RaoP.P.The pyruvic acid analog 3-bromopyruvate interferes with the tetrazolium reagent MTS in the evaluation of cytotoxicity.Assay Drug Dev Technol2010; 8: 258–62.
34.
CapassoJ.M., CossioB.R., BerlT., RivardC.J., JimenezC.A colorimetric assay for determination of cell viability in algal cultures.Biomol Eng2003; 20: 133–8.
35.
PeterM., BinulalN., NairS., SelvamuruganN., TamuraH., JayakumarR.Novel biodegradable chitosan-gelatin/nano-bioactive glass ceramic composite scaffolds for alveolar bone tissue engineering.Chem Eng J2010; 158: 353–61.
36.
MitchellJ.J., PaivaM., HeatonM.B.Optimal 96-well plate set-up to avoid ethanol volatility when assessing ethanol cytotoxicity.Alcohol1998; 15: 137–9.
37.
RibeiroM., EspigaA., SilvaD., BaptistaP., HenriquesJ., FerreiraC.Development of a new chitosan hydrogel for wound dressing.Wound Repair Regen2009; 17: 817–24.
38.
Palmeira-de-OliveiraA., RibeiroM., Palmeira-de-OliveiraR., GasparC., Costa-de-OliveiraS., CorreiaI.Anti-candida activity of a chitosan hydrogel: mechanism of action and cytotoxicity profile.Gynecol Obstet Invest2010; 70: 322–7.
39.
CooperG.M., MooneyM.P., GosainA.K., CampbellP.G., LoseeJ.E., HuardJ.Testing the critical size in calvarial bone defects: revisiting the concept of a critical-size defect.Plast Reconstr Surg2010; 125: 1685.
40.
YeJ.H., XuY.J., GaoJ., YanS.G., ZhaoJ., TuQ.Critical-size calvarial bone defects healing in a mouse model with silk scaffolds and SATB2-modified iPSCs.Biomaterials2011.
41.
PopatK.C., SwanE.E.L., MukhatyarV., ChatvanichkulK.I., MorG.K., GrimesC.A.Influence of nanoporous alumina membranes on long-term osteoblast response.Biomaterials2005; 26: 4516–22.
RamboC., MuellerF., MuellerL., SieberH., HofmannI., GreilP.Biomimetic apatite coating on biomorphous alumina scaffolds.Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl2006; 26: 92–9.
44.
Thein-HanW., MisraR.Biomimetic chitosan–nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Acta Biomater2009; 5(4): 1182–97.
45.
GoldbergV., AkhavanS.Biology of bone grafts.Bone Regeneration and Repair2005: 57–65.
46.
SadiqI.M., ChowdhuryB., ChandrasekaranN., MukherjeeA.Antimicrobial sensitivity of Escherichia coli To alumina nanoparticles.Nanomedicine2009; 5: 282–6.
47.
YangL., SunH., QiN.Novel mini -TCP 3D perfusion bioreactor for proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng2010; 15: 329–40.
48.
HutmacherD.W.Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage.Biomaterials2000; 21: 2529–43.
49.
AccharW., SegadaesA.M.Mechanical properties of a lithium glass-ceramic matrix (LZSA) reinforced with TiC or (W,Ti)C particles: A preliminary study.Compos Struct2010; 92: 707–11.
50.
HamadoucheM., SedelL.Ceramics in orthopaedics.J Bone Joint Surg Br2000; 82: 1095–9.
51.
PattanayakD.K., DivyaP., UpadhyayS., PrasadR.C., RaoB.T., Rama-MohanB.T.Synthesis and evaluation of hydroxyapatite ceramics.Trends Biomater Artif Organs.2005; 18: 87–92.
52.
LeslieW.D., WardL.M.Bone density monitoring with the total hip site: time for a re-evaluation?J Clin Densitom2004; 7: 269–74.
53.
BowenP., CarryC., LuxembourgD., HofmannH.Colloidal processing and sintering of nanosized transition aluminas.Powder Technology2005; 157: 100–7.
54.
OsawaC.C., BertranC.A.Mullite formation from mixtures of alumina and silica sols: Mechanism and pH effect.J Braz Chem Soc2005; 16: 251–8.
55.
MatsumotoH.Cell biology of aluminum toxicity and tolerance in higher plants.Int Rev Cytol2000; 200: 1–46.
56.
RibeiroM., EspigaA., SilvaD., BaptistaP., HenriquesJ., FerreiraC.Development of a new chitosan hydrogel for wound dressing.Wound Repair Regen2009; 17: 817–24.
57.
La FlammeK.E., PopatK.C., LeoniL., MarkiewiczE., La TempaT.J., RomanB.B.Biocompatibility of nanoporous alumina membranes for immunoisolation.Biomaterials2007; 28: 2638–45.
58.
StanfordC.Surface Modification of Biomedical and Dental Implants and the Processes of Inflammation, Wound Healing and Bone Formation.Int J Mol Sci2010; 11: 354.
59.
DaviesJ.E.Immediate loading: The role of the implant surface on biological stabilization.Journal of Implant and Reconstructive Dendistry2010; 2.
60.
KimY.H., AnirbanJ.M., SongH.Y., SeoH.S., LeeB.T.In vitro and in vivo evaluations of 3D Porous TCP-coated and non-coated alumina scaffolds.J Biomater Appl2011; 25: 539.
